It's an interesting experience to be crawling upgrade at full throttle and slow speed in a tunnel while watching the exhaust smoke slowly descend from the roof to the track.
B&O instructions were to cut off the engine and exit the tunnel if the train stalled. No special equipment was provide in the diesel days.
SCUBA (and SCBA, for firefighters, etc) air is tested periodically. Our fire department fills SCUBA tanks as well as firefighting tanks, so the air meets the required standard.
SCBA is now available that will last an hour under normal use. The rule of thumb for firefighting is that a half hour tank will probably last just 20 minutes. The hour rated packs are generally used for HazMat, where just suiting up and undressing can take a fair amount of time. The tank pressure is on the order of 4,500 PSI.
Firefighters have to be medically cleared for SCBA, including a spirometer (tests lung volume), as well as an annual mask fit test.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
Murphy Siding So that's to allow them to get out of a smoky tunnel in an emergency? What about the everyday business of running a locomotive through a tunnel? Do they have to worry about breathing in smoke there, or is it just a matter of rolling up the windows? (Yes, I know they probably don't roll up.)
So that's to allow them to get out of a smoky tunnel in an emergency? What about the everyday business of running a locomotive through a tunnel? Do they have to worry about breathing in smoke there, or is it just a matter of rolling up the windows? (Yes, I know they probably don't roll up.)
Correct, the SCUBA gear is for if you have to walk out of the tunnel. There are tanks stashed every so often in niches in the tunnel wall for when the air runs out in one.
In normal operations, the ventilation system does a pretty good job of keeping exhaust gases out of the cab. Thomas White has a web page explaining how the ventilation system works specifically in the Cascade Tunnel: http://dslweb.nwnexus.com/tawhite/CASCADE%20TUNNEL.html
Dan
Euclid So I was just wondering how that would apply to locomotive engineers breathing compressed air from the brake compressor
Didn't they use asbestos canisters to filter out the oil during the pre-OSHA era?
BEAUSABRE Euclid Were they breathing air directly from the brake system without any special extra filtering? So far as I know yes. Not sure why the air would need to be filtered any more than normal brake air - the air compressors had "strainers" on them to keep out dirt, etc. This is a drawing of a cross compound air compressor - the air strainer is the "can" on the right If you are woried about gas and smoke drawn into the system, it would be diuted by the air already in the tanks and the compressor would not necessaily be running in the tunnels, only when the supply of compressed air needed to be topped off. Aa I stated, a pressure reducing valve was used to reduce pressure to the hood to slightly above atmospheric (if there were any leaks, the air would flow outwards instead of allowing contaminated air in, The same principle as the modern "sealed carbody" locomotive as introduced by GE in the U25B circa 1960)
Euclid Were they breathing air directly from the brake system without any special extra filtering?
So far as I know yes. Not sure why the air would need to be filtered any more than normal brake air - the air compressors had "strainers" on them to keep out dirt, etc. This is a drawing of a cross compound air compressor - the air strainer is the "can" on the right
If you are woried about gas and smoke drawn into the system, it would be diuted by the air already in the tanks and the compressor would not necessaily be running in the tunnels, only when the supply of compressed air needed to be topped off.
Aa I stated, a pressure reducing valve was used to reduce pressure to the hood to slightly above atmospheric (if there were any leaks, the air would flow outwards instead of allowing contaminated air in, The same principle as the modern "sealed carbody" locomotive as introduced by GE in the U25B circa 1960)
Bruce Kelly Eastward ascending grade in Flathead Tunnel is 0.46%. BNSF crews who operate through the Cascade, Flathead, and Stampede tunnels are trained in the use of and instructed to carry with them Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus, as it's called in the employee timetable.
Eastward ascending grade in Flathead Tunnel is 0.46%.
BNSF crews who operate through the Cascade, Flathead, and Stampede tunnels are trained in the use of and instructed to carry with them Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus, as it's called in the employee timetable.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
EuclidWere they breathing air directly from the brake system without any special extra filtering?
PNWRMNM I do not know what the grade in Flathead Tunnel is.
If anyone has trouble accessing relevant sections of this, let me know.
(Didn't Flying Scotsman go through this tunnel, with no particular bad effects, shortly after it was completed? ISTR a Trains article with details...)
Murphy Siding In modern times, are there any safety issues with rail crews and tunnels?
In modern times, are there any safety issues with rail crews and tunnels?
Murphy,
Yes. BNSF Cascade Subdivision Special Instructions contain several paragraphs about use of Breathing Apparatus in the 7.79 mile long Cascade Tunnel. I suspect same is true at their Flathead Tunnel in Montana. These apply in emergecy situations when a crewman has to be on the ground in the tunnel.
There is nothing special for normal operations because ascending eastward trains are working against strong winds created by the ventilation system. Westward trains run on dynamic brake which do not need nearly the air flow to operate as do ascending trains under power. Cascade Tunnel grade is 1.57% ascending eastward. I do not know what the grade in Flathead Tunnel is.
Mac
""TUNNEL MOTORS": Bporn originall of Sothern Pacific rr Heritage, and still 'seeded' in current railroad usage....After fourty plus years, spread like crab grass after the railroad game of merger's and Buy -me, and live forever?
Here is a link from a past TRAINS Article @ https://www.trains.com/trn/train-basics/abcs-of-railroading/tunnel-motors-from-the-past/
They have 'sprouted' all over... Canadian National, and Feromex to name a couple of odd ones...
Here's a C&P,m from the linked article:
"...Eventually, the tunnel motors built for Southern Pacific and Rio Grande and still on the roster in 1996 ended up in the employ of Union Pacific. The majority of the tunnel motors were purged from UP’s roster in the 2000s, ending up on dozens of other Class I railroads, short lines, regionals, and lease fleets across North America. Canadian National is the only Class I operating the tunnel-motor design today. It inherited two separate fleets of SD45T-2s (rebuilt mechanically to SD40-3s) during its acquisition of Bessemer & Lake Erie in 2004 and Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range in 2011. Its fleet of 20 tunnel motors see service primarily on CN’s iron-ore operations in the upper Midwest..."
Were they breathing air directly from the brake system without any special extra filtering?
Murphy SidingI think I recall some steam era railroads putting gas masks on their crews?
Some photos on another thread of MRL locomotives that are black from use in tunnels make me wonder. I've read where SP had issues with smoke in tunnels, leading to cab forward steam locomotives. I think I recall some steam era railroads putting gas masks on their crews? In modern times, are there any safety issues with rail crews and tunnels?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.