Trains.com

International vs. domestic containers

5217 views
42 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,673 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Friday, November 12, 2021 6:45 PM
 

BaltACD

 

 
Backshop
Yeah, but did you read the preface on the report.  It claims that they damage the roads less than two standard trucks, which is BS.  The MTA (MI Trucking Assn) is one of the strongest lobbying groups in the state.  They know which palms to grease.  Their claim used to be that MI needed the heavier trucks because of all the heavy industry we have.  Those days are long gone, so they started a new tack.  Also, that it's better because of the driver shortage.

 

Is Michigan building the roads to a higher standard to support the additional weights than the rest of the states are?

 

The main problem here is civil engineers don't account for the high water table we have.. The mix of sandy and clay soil is not satisfactory. Clay has very little to no percolation. Poor drainage destroys the sub grade of the road. The weight just makes it worse. The thaw freeze cycles don't help either. Southwestern Ontario has just as high axle loads on their trucks yet their roads are much better and they have very similar soil conditions..

 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Friday, November 12, 2021 6:47 PM

Are the civil engineers in Michigan stikingly stupid?  If so, I hope they don't migrate elsewhere.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,994 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, November 12, 2021 7:09 PM

7j43k
Are the civil engineers in Michigan stikingly stupid?  If so, I hope they don't migrate elsewhere. 

Ed

No contractor has ever found a corner he couldn't cut to increase his profit.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Friday, November 12, 2021 7:17 PM

True.  I find them all the time.  I just don't choose to take them.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,417 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, November 12, 2021 9:11 PM

Michigan trucks have to have a lot more axels so the per axel loan is the same.  Some of the trucks have retractable axels for seasonal "frost law" load limits.

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,437 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Friday, November 12, 2021 9:13 PM

You can blame poorly built roads on how the USA contracts road construction out.  Instead of requirements of lasting so many years between being replaced and so for with warranty requirements in the contracts.  Nope it's a generic set of requirements for each state with a baseline requirement and the cheapest contract wins regardless of if the project fails 6 months later.  All of this mandated by the Federal government.  

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Friday, November 12, 2021 11:08 PM

 

 

Shadow the Cats owner

You can blame poorly built roads on how the USA contracts road construction out.  Instead of requirements of lasting so many years between being replaced and so for with warranty requirements in the contracts.  Nope it's a generic set of requirements for each state with a baseline requirement and the cheapest contract wins regardless of if the project fails 6 months later.  All of this mandated by the Federal government.  

 

Truly amazing how the federal government causes historically crappy roads in Michigan.

One can only wonder how Michigan became the target of federal ire, as opposed to Nevada.  Or Nebraska.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,564 posts
Posted by Backshop on Saturday, November 13, 2021 7:46 AM

7j43k

He also explained why some people in Michigan were living in basements without a hint of a house on top.

Ed 

I've never seen that.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, November 13, 2021 8:16 AM

7j43k
He also explained why some people in Michigan were living in basements without a hint of a house on top.

Used to be some of those in northern, NY, too...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,994 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, November 13, 2021 9:46 AM

Part of the reason for the Eisenhower Interstate System was also as a Defense Mobility function.  Have the spec for the roadway been designed to support moving Abrams M1A1 Main Battle tanks on the roadways without significant damage?

I am led to understand that the German Autobahns were constructed with a 20 inch thick road surface.  I believe the US standard is 6 inches.  I am willing to be corrected.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,564 posts
Posted by Backshop on Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:44 AM

The Abrams wasn't developed until well after the Interstate System was built.  I've seen some construction and it seems to be quite a bit thicker than 6 inches.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, November 13, 2021 11:00 AM

BaltACD

Part of the reason for the Eisenhower Interstate System was also as a Defense Mobility function.  Have the spec for the roadway been designed to support moving Abrams M1A1 Main Battle tanks on the roadways without significant damage?

I am led to understand that the German Autobahns were constructed with a 20 inch thick road surface.  I believe the US standard is 6 inches.  I am willing to be corrected.

 

 

Since the weight of an M1A1 is about the same as an M103, and the M103 was on the drawing board in 1950, I would think that there wouldn't be any change in design to handle the M1A1.  Since it would be on a transporter, the overall weight might be less IF the transporter had a lower tare weight.

 

An online search for concrete thickness for the Autobahn finds 8 inches.

An online search for concrete thickness for Interstate highways finds 11-12 inches.

I didn't spend lots of time confirming the above two statements.  

However:

Here is a pamphlet that shows the 11 inch thick concrete on top of 21 inches of aggregate on top of compacted soil:

https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2006/3127/2006-3127.pdf

 

Ed

  • Member since
    April 2021
  • 62 posts
Posted by SALfan1 on Saturday, November 13, 2021 6:18 PM

BaltACD

 

 
7j43k
Are the civil engineers in Michigan stikingly stupid?  If so, I hope they don't migrate elsewhere. 

Ed

 

No contractor has ever found a corner he couldn't cut to increase his profit.

 

BaltACD

You are so right!!  Unless you have 10-15 highly qualified, highly motivated engineers/engineer techs watching every move the contractor makes all day long and part of the night, and even then the contractor can find a way.  Most of the construction contracts I had when with the Feds, the supervising engineer was part-time on any one project, and if there was an engineer tech available part-time in addition, it was like a fantasy come true.  

 

 
7j43k
Are the civil engineers in Michigan stikingly stupid?  If so, I hope they don't migrate elsewhere. 

Ed

 

No contractor has ever found a corner he couldn't cut to increase his profit.

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy