Trains.com

Flathead Tunnel

2670 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Monday, March 15, 2021 1:46 PM
 

Murphy Siding

 

 
SD60MAC9500
 

Not only was Flathead Tunnel built with sufficient clearance to accommodate 20'2" Plate H (Greenbrier now makes a Plate K autorack at 20'3") without modification. You could place a low profile rigid catenary system on the roof of the tunnel. Was Flathead Tunnel built with the possibility of future electrification in mind?

 
 
 
 

 

 

Why aren't these trains pushing a big cloud of black smoke out the tunnel ahead of them like a lot of videos show whena train comes out of a tunnel?

 

 

As Bruce stated the train is Westbound heading downgrade. Flathead Tunnel is orientated in a North South axis. Trains heading North would be Eastbound. Heading South, Westbound. The grade Eastbound (North) is just under 0.5%. Due to such a low grade this also allows a speed of 50 MPH through Flathead.  

 
 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 602 posts
Posted by Bruce Kelly on Sunday, March 14, 2021 9:43 PM

The trains exiting Flathead Tunnel in that video are westbound, on a descending grade. 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, March 14, 2021 8:37 PM

Murphy Siding
 
SD60MAC9500
 

Not only was Flathead Tunnel built with sufficient clearance to accommodate 20'2" Plate H (Greenbrier now makes a Plate K autorack at 20'3") without modification. You could place a low profile rigid catenary system on the roof of the tunnel. Was Flathead Tunnel built with the possibility of future electrification in mind?

 

Why aren't these trains pushing a big cloud of black smoke out the tunnel ahead of them like a lot of videos show whena train comes out of a tunnel?

More effective ventilation systems, cleaner operating locomotives, and not knowing if the picture was taken at the high or low end of the tunnel.

B&O's Howard Street Tunnel only required Electric Motor helpers to assist trains moving Eastbound uphill to the Baltimore Belt Line.  Westbound train with their steam engines were permitted to operate through the tunnel without assistance as they were drifting and not working steam going downhill.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, March 14, 2021 2:25 PM

SD60MAC9500
 

Not only was Flathead Tunnel built with sufficient clearance to accommodate 20'2" Plate H (Greenbrier now makes a Plate K autorack at 20'3") without modification. You could place a low profile rigid catenary system on the roof of the tunnel. Was Flathead Tunnel built with the possibility of future electrification in mind?

 
 
 
 

Why aren't these trains pushing a big cloud of black smoke out the tunnel ahead of them like a lot of videos show whena train comes out of a tunnel?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, March 14, 2021 1:14 PM

Erik_Mag
When the Southern opened up the Rathole division inthe 1960's the tunnels were explicitly designed to accomodate electrification. On that basis, it's possible that the Flathead was also built to accomodata electrification.

OTOH, the Flathead tunnel was also built after the introduction of tri-level auto racks and the tunnel height may have been set up to accomodate airflow above these cars. GN had 10 years of experience running diesels through the Cascade tunnel and that may have steered them to be generous with clearances.

Considering how the size of rail cars has grown over the past century - anyone building a capital project such as a tunnel or bridge if they are not generous with the clearances there will be a higher price to be paid sometime in the future.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 1,686 posts
Posted by Erik_Mag on Sunday, March 14, 2021 12:25 PM

When the Southern opened up the Rathole division inthe 1960's the tunnels were explicitly designed to accomodate electrification. On that basis, it's possible that the Flathead was also built to accomodata electrification.

OTOH, the Flathead tunnel was also built after the introduction of tri-level auto racks and the tunnel height may have been set up to accomodate airflow above these cars. GN had 10 years of experience running diesels through the Cascade tunnel and that may have steered them to be generous with clearances.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Sunday, March 14, 2021 11:39 AM
 

Not only was Flathead Tunnel built with sufficient clearance to accommodate 20'2" Plate H (Greenbrier now makes a Plate K autorack at 20'3") without modification. You could place a low profile rigid catenary system on the roof of the tunnel. Was Flathead Tunnel built with the possibility of future electrification in mind?

 
 
 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 602 posts
Posted by Bruce Kelly on Sunday, March 14, 2021 9:36 AM

Doublestacks do pass through Flathead Tunnel.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Flathead Tunnel
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, March 14, 2021 8:57 AM

No double-stacks; via Montana Rail-link instead?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy