Trains.com

Intermodal Volumes See Further Declines in April

2297 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2019
  • 313 posts
Posted by Juniata Man on Monday, June 1, 2020 5:40 PM

ROBIN LUETHE

So with their super operating ratios have railroads dropped their rates just a bit to remain more competative with other transportatoins modes?  I think that is what is suppose to happen in a market economy.  As opposed to a take it or leave it economy.

 

 

Not according to their chief marketing officers when they do their quarterly monkey show for Wall Street.  Both Kenny Rocker at UP and Alan Shaw at NS have bragged about maintaining their pricing discipline on IM business despite the erosion in their volumes.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 80 posts
Posted by ROBIN LUETHE on Monday, June 1, 2020 4:53 PM

So with their super operating ratios have railroads dropped their rates just a bit to remain more competative with other transportatoins modes?  I think that is what is suppose to happen in a market economy.  As opposed to a take it or leave it economy.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, June 1, 2020 8:38 AM

Ulrich
Murphy Siding
Euclid

I don't see how either rail or trucking survives if demand for transportation fails to cover the cost of capital investment.

We'll find out who saved for a rainy day.

That pretty much nails it . Anyone remember 2018? Rates were sky high..and as usual people called it "the new normal" and that the good times would go on forever. And here we are in 2020..the rates are in the toilet.. the intelligent operators put money aside for just such a situation..because they understand the ebb and flow of the market. The dummies expanded their operations while also taking advantage of low interest rates.. and here we are.. Chicago to Brooklyn for 800 bucks.. of course its never their fault..blame it on covid, the middlemen logistics people...other carriers who refuse to keep their rates artificially high..

My view from the sidelines.... Whistling  I retired from 20+ years in OTR Transport; in 2002.  So sort of like greyhounds, I'm interested, but follow from the side lines. 

  I have a 'future'  relatiion [by granddaughter's marriage] in 3PL logistics in K.C. As Murphy S. mentioned he tells me his business is really booming there. [ K.C. area is adjacent to the monster logistics and container origin/destination facility of BNSF's/Gardner,Ks..] 

 Ulrich mentioned the truck rate Chicago/Brooklyn of $800. [25 years ago, that $8 hundred number was considered a pretty fail rate in that lane...In fact, anything in the dollar a mile range was considered good in the for-hire side of trucking. Of course, fuel was no where near the current price levels... One-Driver pay was anywhere in the .25c to .60 p.m. for  non-unon driver; many OTR drivers drove for a percentage( commission) of the load. Can't say what the current state of driver pay is these days(?) .

  There are current threads here that indicate IM traffic is down;  from observations, I'd have to agree that total number of trains, are definitely off on BNSF.  BUT,  I am seeing more of the traffic thru this area handled by the 'Land Barges' [much longer trains with mid-train power and rear DPUs.]  They were thru here at the rate of maybe one a week; recently, they seem to be one a day, both [1 Eastbnd and 1 Westbnd] directions.  The TOFC traffic gets really heavy around the week-ends {Friday thru Mondays}, but is still runs some thru the week.

Note to Mike 90, and those following the Thread for BNSF's two tracking of the Southern Transcon:  My guess is that the 'project' up in the Filnt Hills {Matfied Green area} is done (?). Seems like they are pushing the IM traffic up that way more than they had been doing. Pushing it more to the East. rather than up thru Wichita towards Newton, and across towards K.C. (?).

 

 


 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
Posted by chicagorails on Sunday, May 31, 2020 4:41 AM
Traffic is picking up don't worry
  • Member since
    June 2019
  • 313 posts
Posted by Juniata Man on Saturday, May 30, 2020 5:53 PM

 

Are shippers really any different than anyone else?  Hell even the railroads will try to squeeze a nickel hard enough to make it spit out six cents.

Who doesn't look for the best deal in our personal lives either.  Places like Walmart, Sam's, Costco and do on don't exist because people are willing to pay top dollar for stuff they need or want.  By extension; the folks producing what's sold must also work to drive out costs so they can afford to sell the stuff no one wants to pay too much for.

I believe it was Pogo who noted he had met the enemy and it was us.

 
Murphy Siding
      The majority of truckloads that come to us utilize 3rd party trucking firms. Shippers, for the most part don't care about the truckers. They typically are just looking for somebody to haul cheap.

 

Observation - Shippers and Consignees don't care about any transportation mode - at least not until penaltie$ begin to accumulate.

 

[/quote]

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Saturday, May 30, 2020 2:05 PM

Murphy Siding

 

 
Euclid

I don't see how either rail or trucking survives if demand for transportation fails to cover the cost of capital investment. 

 

 

 

 

We'll find out who saved for a rainy day.

 

 

 

That pretty much nails it . Anyone remember 2018? Rates were sky high..and as usual people called it "the new normal" and that the good times would go on forever. And here we are in 2020..the rates are in the toilet.. the intelligent operators put money aside for just such a situation..because they understand the ebb and flow of the market. The dummies expanded their operations while also taking advantage of low interest rates.. and here we are.. Chicago to Brooklyn for 800 bucks.. of course its never their fault..blame it on covid, the middlemen logistics people...other carriers who refuse to keep their rates artificially high..

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, May 28, 2020 9:54 PM

Murphy Siding
      The majority of truckloads that come to us utilize 3rd party trucking firms. Shippers, for the most part don't care about the truckers. They typically are just looking for somebody to haul cheap.

Observation - Shippers and Consignees don't care about any transportation mode - at least not until penaltie$ begin to accumulate.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 28, 2020 9:50 PM

BaltACD

 

 
Murphy Siding
     Here is an interesting turn of events, related to freight rates & such- We get carloads of siding from a mill that is about 450 railroad miles away. Highway miles are closer to 400. The siding company just came out with a proposal they think we should simply love. Instead of shipping a full carload, they would ship the same material on 4 semi-trucks, all on the same day, at the same price! So instead of having our normal 2-1/2 days to unload a car, we would have to unload the same amount off 4 trucks on the same day as they came through the gate. And for that, we would get siding at the same price! Me thinks some corporate folks don’t get out much.

 

Drug dealer trying to get you hooked.

Does your facility even have the ability to handle 4 trucks at the same time?  What are the penalties for driver/trailer detention?  Would the trucks be guaranteed to arrive when your staff could handle them at straight time?  Just like everything else - the devil is in the details.  If you are offered a 'deal' that is too good to be true - after the details are accounted for, it is too good to be true.

 

We can handle the trucks. We've always been trucker friendly, because that's the right thing to do. If a truck can get to us before 4:00, we will get them unloaded. In extreme condtions, we've accomodated for later deliveries.

      The majority of truckloads that come to us utilize 3rd party trucking firms. Shippers, for the most part don't care about the truckers. They typically are just looking for somebody to haul cheap.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, May 28, 2020 6:01 PM

Murphy Siding
     Here is an interesting turn of events, related to freight rates & such- We get carloads of siding from a mill that is about 450 railroad miles away. Highway miles are closer to 400. The siding company just came out with a proposal they think we should simply love. Instead of shipping a full carload, they would ship the same material on 4 semi-trucks, all on the same day, at the same price! So instead of having our normal 2-1/2 days to unload a car, we would have to unload the same amount off 4 trucks on the same day as they came through the gate. And for that, we would get siding at the same price! Me thinks some corporate folks don’t get out much.

Drug dealer trying to get you hooked.

Does your facility even have the ability to handle 4 trucks at the same time?  What are the penalties for driver/trailer detention?  Would the trucks be guaranteed to arrive when your staff could handle them at straight time?  Just like everything else - the devil is in the details.  If you are offered a 'deal' that is too good to be true - after the details are accounted for, it is too good to be true.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 28, 2020 4:45 PM

Convicted One
 
Murphy Siding
Instead of shipping a full carload, they would ship the same material on 4 semi-trucks, all on the same day, at the same price!

 

If someone was handing me that offer, I'd be curious if te other shoe had yet to fall.

Perhaps they are offering you this opportunity at the "same price" before they tell you that the rail alternative is about to get an increase.

You know, they are giving you this GREAT OPPORTUNITY to dodge the looming price hike.

Those are the kinds of 'opportunity' people usually extend to me.

 

Close. I bet the next move is to eliminate the rail option with those of us too close to the mill to ship competitively by rail. Of course, they'll say that's a reason to raise the prices as well. Mischief

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 28, 2020 3:38 PM

Murphy Siding
Instead of shipping a full carload, they would ship the same material on 4 semi-trucks, all on the same day, at the same price!

If someone was handing me that offer, I'd be curious if te other shoe had yet to fall.

Perhaps they are offering you this opportunity at the "same price" before they tell you that the rail alternative is about to get an increase.

You know, they are giving you this GREAT OPPORTUNITY to dodge the looming price hike.

Those are the kinds of 'opportunity' people usually extend to me.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 28, 2020 2:47 PM

     Here is an interesting turn of events, related to freight rates & such- We get carloads of siding from a mill that is about 450 railroad miles away. Highway miles are closer to 400. The siding company just came out with a proposal they think we should simply love. Instead of shipping a full carload, they would ship the same material on 4 semi-trucks, all on the same day, at the same price! So instead of having our normal 2-1/2 days to unload a car, we would have to unload the same amount off 4 trucks on the same day as they came through the gate. And for that, we would get siding at the same price! Me thinks some corporate folks don’t get out much.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, May 28, 2020 1:24 PM

Murphy Siding
We'll find out who saved for a rainy day.

Hopefully fuel cost should be lower than it was in February as well, so there should be some offset.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Thursday, May 28, 2020 12:48 PM

Murphy Siding
Can you tell me what the old rate was, for comparison?

In February DAT shows the average dry van rate was $1.79/mile.  In May they show $1.57/mile.  (-$0.22/mile, a 12.3% decline.)  Truckload carriers are in a market that approaches perfect competition.  So, they just do not have that kind of margin to give up and survive long term.  Hopefully, for my sanity and other things, this isn't long term.

Edit to add:

The Wall Street Journal (paywall) covered the issue today.  The Mr. Green they quote is apparently an Owner Operator leased to Freymiller Trucking.

"Freight prices, meanwile, have plunged amid falling transportation demand.

Loads that once paid $2.80 a mile are now going for as little as $0.80 a mile, not enough to cover the cost of moving them, Mr. Green said.

'I'm making the truck payments and barely keeping my stuff afloat.  Thank God I've got a landlord that's great.  Other than that I would be in bankruptcy.'"

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 28, 2020 11:14 AM

Euclid

I don't see how either rail or trucking survives if demand for transportation fails to cover the cost of capital investment. 

 

 

We'll find out who saved for a rainy day.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 28, 2020 11:13 AM

greyhounds

As I've said before, I watch truck rates from a site called DAT.  Out of habbit I suppose.

Anyway, those charges have crashed.  DAT tells me that the average dry van rate is down to $1.57/mile.  A good part of the North American economy has been shut down.  There's less freight to move.  Trucking companies, most of which are quite small, are in a bind.  They've got have cash coming in, but there's less cash to bring in.  So they compete by cutting their charges.  I can't see a lot of them surviving long term at $1.57/mile.

If I was doing pricing for a railroad I would never loose business to a trucker on price. At least on a 500+ mile haul.  But I'm retired.

So a shipper is faced with a trucker literally begging for business and offering dirt cheap rates.  It goes from there.

 

 

Can you tell me what the old rate was, for comparison?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, May 28, 2020 10:46 AM

I don't see how either rail or trucking survives if demand for transportation fails to cover the cost of capital investment. 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, May 28, 2020 9:18 AM

greyhounds
Trucking companies, most of which are quite small, are in a bind.  They've got have cash coming in, but there's less cash to bring in.  So they compete by cutting their charges.  I can't see a lot of them surviving long term at $1.57/mile.

I confess that I want to hear ttrraaffiicc's 'explanation' how we get to a pervasive environment of autonomous electric trucks with the whole support infrastructure for guidance and power, probably with hard time limits on battery-pack life under load, with these margins.

It'll be amusing, anyway.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Thursday, May 28, 2020 8:33 AM

greyhounds

As I've said before, I watch truck rates from a site called DAT.  Out of habbit I suppose.

Anyway, those charges have crashed.  DAT tells me that the average dry van rate is down to $1.57/mile.  A good part of the North American economy has been shut down.  There's less freight to move.  Trucking companies, most of which are quite small, are in a bind.  They've got have cash coming in, but there's less cash to bring in.  So they compete by cutting their charges.  I can't see a lot of them surviving long term at $1.57/mile.

If I was doing pricing for a railroad I would never loose business to a trucker on price. At least on a 500+ mile haul.  But I'm retired.

So a shipper is faced with a trucker literally begging for business and offering dirt cheap rates.  It goes from there.

 

 

The return of the Zombie Truckers?

http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/p/170391/1870840.aspx#1870840 

Jeff

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Thursday, May 28, 2020 3:15 AM

As I've said before, I watch truck rates from a site called DAT.  Out of habbit I suppose.

Anyway, those charges have crashed.  DAT tells me that the average dry van rate is down to $1.57/mile.  A good part of the North American economy has been shut down.  There's less freight to move.  Trucking companies, most of which are quite small, are in a bind.  They've got to have cash coming in, but there's less cash to bring in.  So they compete by cutting their charges.  I can't see a lot of them surviving long term at $1.57/mile.

If I was doing pricing for a railroad I would never loose business to a trucker on price. At least on a 500+ mile haul.  But I'm retired.

So a shipper is faced with a trucker literally begging for business and offering dirt cheap rates.  It goes from there.

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 11:13 AM

Murphy Siding
Gee, I wonder what's behind that?"

Obviously it's the shippers who are to blame for their unwillingness to pay a fair  price for service. Dunce

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:40 AM

In my best Ronald Reagan voice: "Gee, I wonder what's behind that?" Mischief

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:37 AM

Is anyone surprised?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Intermodal Volumes See Further Declines in April
Posted by Victrola1 on Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:21 AM

 

"Total shipments for the month—at 1,280,309—were off 15% annually. Domestic containers—at 523,732—were off 14.7%, while trailers—at 71,086—slumped 30.5%%. All domestic equipment—at 594,818—was off 17%. ISO, or international, containers—at 685,491—saw a 13.2% decline."

https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/intermodal_volumes_see_further_declines_in_april_reports_iana?utm_source=TWIL&utm_medium=NLT

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy