jeffhergertEHH may have been the greatest practitioner of cutting your way to short term prosperity, but he is by no means the only one doing it. Does "Drive to 65" OR or "G-55+0" OR sound like they are similar? Truth is it isn't really EHH that has caused this. He was just the guy with the best PR to implement managment practices like those to boost stock prices for short term gain. The ones who are really driving this are the short term "activist investors." EHH may be gone, but they aren't. And they still want the largest returns ASAP, to heck with tomorrow. Jeff
Jeff
And in doing so, the 'activist investors' are on the path to create another Pennsylvania and New Your Central morphing into Penn Central.
Those companies looted their properties to keep paying investors their dividends until the companies were the walking dead, a shell of a company - and then they merged and the blood bath began in earnest!
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
EHH may be gone, but his legacy lives on. Except for BNSF, all the major carriers are doing similar things to what EHH did at CSX, and CP before that. My supervisor at my biannual employee developement said they (managment, at least field level) hoped with EHH gone that things would let up. Note that I don't work for CSX.
EHH may have been the greatest practitioner of cutting your way to short term prosperity, but he is by no means the only one doing it. Does "Drive to 65" OR or "G-55+0" OR sound like they are similar? Truth is it isn't really EHH that has caused this. He was just the guy with the best PR to implement managment practices like those to boost stock prices for short term gain. The ones who are really driving this are the short term "activist investors." EHH may be gone, but they aren't. And they still want the largest returns ASAP, to heck with tomorrow.
466lex Chemical carloads are down 3.4% in the East, 2018/2017. But the “split” is fascinating: CSX is down 11.4%, with NS is up 8.1%.
In the Conrail split, CSX came away with the bulk of the Texas/NJ chem traffic. UP/BNSF over Salem was a better deal for UP and BNSF than NS over New Orleans and since that's where the bulk of the traffic originated....
...it didn't matter that the NS route was shorter.
My mantra remains the same. RRs better figure out how to get from "general merchandise - centric" with intermodal added in, to "intermodal centric" with boutique merchandise added in. The trends have been clear for decades, now.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
blue streak 1 Oltmannd: what would it take for NS to enlarge the 2 C of GA tunnels to plate "H" clearances. Would the effort and time pay off to allow more by-passing of ATL be worth it ? Have no idea what those tunnels look like and their dimensions ? Would that route work for all regular trains that would need the power to get out of BHM ? EDIT: Any other clearance problems on that route ? What about signaling ? There is the street running in Columbus.
Oltmannd: what would it take for NS to enlarge the 2 C of GA tunnels to plate "H" clearances. Would the effort and time pay off to allow more by-passing of ATL be worth it ? Have no idea what those tunnels look like and their dimensions ? Would that route work for all regular trains that would need the power to get out of BHM ?
EDIT: Any other clearance problems on that route ? What about signaling ?
There is the street running in Columbus.
Mainline capacity is not the problem. There's been no real change in train counts for years. It's the yards and terminals that can't process the traffic. The CofG thing is really minor and temporary. It just gets a train or two a day out of the congested Atlanta terminal.
The "drive to 65" OR is partly to blame - and forgetting the lessons of 2014/15. If you cut resources too close and run too close to capacity (and I mean crews for the main and yards, most likely), any hiccup will cause a "traffic jam" and put you in the ditch.
I'm not buying the "traffic bump" story at all. It's the carload side that's in trouble and its growth has been almost nothing.
Digging out is very expensive compared to keeping some margin of capacity.
This has been both interesting and sad to watch happen.
Maybe these changes will improve the Crescent's OTP ?
NORFOLK, Va. — Norfolk Southern is taking steps to unclog congested areas of its system in Alabama and Georgia, where a combination of traffic growth and bad weather have gummed up yards and single-track main lines. For the year-to-date compar...
http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2018/02/27-norfolk-southern-adds-crews-reopens-through-route-to-ease-congestion-in-south
Brian Schmidt, Editor, Classic Trains magazine
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.