Trains.com

CSX; How much business has been lost since Harrison took over?

3269 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,475 posts
CSX; How much business has been lost since Harrison took over?
Posted by overall on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:48 AM

We have all heard that a large number of customers pulled business from CSX and gave it to ORT or NS. I am curious as to how much, as a percentage of business they had before EHH, was lost. Was it 30% of the pre-EHH level? Was it more, less?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,931 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:19 PM

The real truth will be difficult to discern.  CSX has some of the best 'figuring liars' in the business and will present figures to support whatever spin top management wants to present.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,789 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:35 PM

Losing business in this market? Anything with wheels and a motor should be turning a big profit right now. 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,825 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:01 PM

Ulrich

Losing business in this market? Anything with wheels and a motor should be turning a big profit right now. 

 

Unless you've convinced (or is that deluded?) yourself that most of the business out there isn't worth having.

Balt, CSX doesn't have a corner on the spinmeisters.  I think all the class one's, with maybe the exception of BNSF, who have to answer to activist investors know how to talk up less is more.  As long as they can squeeze out more pennies on the same or declining level of business and keep profits up, they are happy.  

It's when the gravy train (pun intended) eventually runs out of steam that everyone will by crying.  Except those activist investor types.  They'll have moved on to some other company or industry.

Jeff  

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,369 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:39 PM

Ulrich
Losing business in this market? Anything with wheels and a motor should be turning a big profit right now.

For sure!

DAT is a service that provides information to truckers and about trucking.  I read what they will let me have for free.  (Hey, I was in marketing and I learned to keep up with what the competition was doing.)

In the US the average dry van spot rate for the week ended 12/30/2017 was $2.11 per mile.  That's an increase of $0.38/mile (22%) from a year earlier.  Can you say "BOOM"?  The average reefer spot rate for the same week was $2.46 per mile.  That's an increase of $0.47/mile (23.6%) from a year earlier.  

DAT also does a "Loads per Truck" ratio.  It's off the chart with many more loads needing trucks.

This is all good for rail intermodal and that business is indeed also booming.  More business at higher rates was a great Christmas present.

What's going on?  Well, for one thing the economy is growing much faster than it has done for a while.  If the freight demand curve shifts then freight rates go up.  Second, we just don't know how much capacity the electronic log mandate (effective more or less on 12/18/2017) took out of trucking.  It probably reduced trucking capacity somewhat by stricter enforcement of trucker's hours of service rules.  How much, I cannot quantify.

Anyway, we seem to be looking at increased demand for freight movement with some unquantifiable decrease in trucking supply.  This forces truck rates up and diverts some amount of freight to rail.  

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,789 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 5:10 PM

Indeed greyhounds.. its both good and bad. While the rates are way up the bad news is that shippers are looking at their options, and everything is on the table. It really gives me no great pleasure to jack up my own rates; however, not doing so in the short term  would drive my own suppliers into the hands of my competition. Some customers get that.. others don't.  If there ever was a time for innovation in this business, this is it. Ultimately the spoils (long term anyway) will go to those who look at this situation and try to figure a way out of it that doesn't involve simply handing the customer a huge rate increase. Rail is certainly going to be a key part of that..containers, boxcars, revitalizing sidings and team tracks.. all of it. Our customers are frustrated  across the board.. and I'm not talking about only CSX's customers. They're all on the brink..angry, frustrated... lookin for help.  

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 9:47 PM

greyhounds
. . . This is all good for rail intermodal and that business is indeed also booming.  More business at higher rates was a great Christmas present. . . . 

Unless a railroad has taken itself out of the intermodal business, which I understand CSX has.  Sigh 

For the best data, wait about a year and look at the annual R-1 report that has to be filed with the STB.  Falsifying that data could lead to an extended stay in substandard Federal housing (credit the late Tom Clancy for that turn of phrase).

- PDN. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,369 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:42 AM

Paul_D_North_Jr
Unless a railroad has taken itself out of the intermodal business, which I understand CSX has.

Paul, can you elaborate on that a slight amount?

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 655 posts
Posted by 466lex on Thursday, January 4, 2018 10:38 PM
Original post:
“We have all heard that a large number of customers pulled business from CSX and gave it to ORT or NS. I am curious as to how much, as a percentage of business they had before EHH, was lost. Was it 30% of the pre-EHH level? Was it more, less?”
Less.
The full 52 week, quarterly, and weekly reports of the individual Class 1s are in:
                              2017 vs. 2016
Intermodal        CSX               NS
  Containers     +2.4%          +4.3%
  Trailers           -4.4%         +16.9%
  Total               +2.2%          +5.3%
 
Carload               CSX               NS
  Mdse.              -3.0%           +0.5%
  Coal                 +4.6%         +16.6%
  Total                -1.4%           +4.5%
 
No particularly dramatic, i.e., “30%", shifts are evident, but it does appear that NS may have taken most of the traditionally anemic eastern Carload growth.  Coal performance is hard to interpret without specific utility and export market dynamics information.
 
To me, the clearest loss for CSX is in the service-sensitive (but least profitable) intermodal trailer segment.  Perhaps some UPS shifts, and preference of OTR truckers for NS, given the widely publicized CSX service problems.  (The hot OTR segment, as described by greyhounds, is sending its least service- sensitive overflow to the rails … again, but not so much to CSX.)
 

 

I have the Forth Quarter figures, which show some modest amplification of NS gains late in the year, but again, nothing dramatic.  
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, January 5, 2018 6:09 AM

466lex
The full 52 week, quarterly, and weekly reports of the individual Class 1s are in:                               2017 vs. 2016 Intermodal        CSX               NS   Containers     +2.4%          +4.3%   Trailers           -4.4%         +16.9%   Total               +2.2%          +5.3%   Carload               CSX               NS   Mdse.              -3.0%           +0.5%   Coal                 +4.6%         +16.6%   Total                -1.4%           +4.5%   No particularly dramatic, i.e., “30%", shifts are evident, but it does appear that NS may have taken most of the traditionally anemic eastern Carload growth.  Coal performance is hard to interpret without specific utility and export market dynamics information.   To me, the clearest loss for CSX is in the service-sensitive (but least profitable) intermodal trailer segment.  Perhaps some UPS shifts, and preference of OTR truckers for NS, given the widely publicized CSX service problems.  (The hot OTR segment, as described by greyhounds, is sending its least service- sensitive overflow to the rails … again, but not so much to CSX.)

Completely agree with your assessment of NS capturing premium TOFC traffic from CSX in 2017 even though TOFC is small fraction of overall intermodal these days.  This is lucrative business and generally pays a high rate per box, but requires good train performance.

One of the things NS said about traffic diverted from CSX was that they were not going to try to take all-comers.  Only traffic that would involved a long term commitent...  

Of course, while CSX's performance numbers show them slowly getting out of the ditch, NS is headed the other way.  2018 might tell a different story.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Friday, January 5, 2018 2:39 PM

greyhounds
Paul_D_North_Jr
Unless a railroad has taken itself out of the intermodal business, which I understand CSX has.

466lex and Don Oltmann did a better job above based on actual data than I could.  I do see that container volumes appear to have increased.  
"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,918 posts
Posted by MP173 on Friday, January 5, 2018 4:21 PM

Mostly antedotal info here:

1.  My son in 3PL says "it is a mess" right now.  Doesnt even want to discuss the problems with me.  If he doesnt want to talk to me about his work problems, it is a mess.

2.  Legit trucking companies are doing very well with rates, as Greyhound pointed out.  Two major trailer manufacturers told me "trucking companies are making very good money" and are buying big amounts of trailers.  Problem with trailer manufacturers is labor....they cannot find people to work in factories.

3.  Working at home has huge advantages.  One is that I have the Chesterton web cam and scanner on and watch the parade of NS trains.  Very obvious is the increase in intermodal traffic, particularly the trailer business.  NS still runs a decent amount of TOFC...kinda fun to see the old "piggyback" trains, although they are mixed in with double stacks.  Anyway, a year ago their Chicago - Croxton priority trains 20E and 20k were solid with 20E typically having 80-120 units and 20k about 40-70 units.

Today's 20E has 103 and 20k was only 48.  But yesterday 20K had 110 and on Wednesday had 134.   Business has spiked for the 20k, which typically has refer trailers (Marten, Alliance, Navajo, etc) as a big portion of the business.  

Lot more trailers on the NS these days.  It will be interesting to see if that sticks or goes away as CSX re-evaluates and the trucking industry stabilizes (they will).  

What I would really like to do is go watch the CSX Q010 and see how their loads compare vs a few years ago.  That train would typically have 50 - 75 UPS trailers/containers per day.  

NS seems very fluid these days, even with the East Coast weather.  Amtrak, has been extremely late this week, #49 has been running about 3-4 hours tardy.

Ed

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,369 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, January 9, 2018 5:29 PM

As information, DAT reports that spot motor freight rates surged some more for the week ending 1/6/2018.

On a nationwide average spot dry van rates went up to $2.30/mile.  +$0.19/mile or 9%.  In a week!  Simlilar spot reefer rates went up to $2.71/mile.  +$0.25/mile or 10.2% in a week.

DAT cites weather factors (I guess it's hard to keep trucks moving in a "Bomb Cyclone", whatever that is.) and electronic logs for the tight supply of trucks.  The tight supply forces rates up.

The bad weather will go away.  The electronic logs won't go away.  We live in interesting times.  

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy