Trains.com

First train across new Portageville bridge

2263 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
First train across new Portageville bridge
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 11:17 AM

At 2:20 Monday afternoon, NS train 36T is the first movement across the new Portageville arch bridge.

 Story in Progressive Railroading.

The old bridge could not support modern car weight of 286,000lb - perhaps unsurprisingly for a structure built over 140 years ago (more than a decade older than the Poughkeepsie Bridge) that took less than two months to construct.

Here is the American Bridge Web page on the project.

And here is the engineering firm's report on the structure.

Some of you might enjoy this view of the construction:

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 5:56 PM

Good looking bridge!

If I remember reading correctly, the old 1875 bridge was offered to the state of New York as part of a hiking trail, but the state demurred, so it's coming down.

Too bad, having lasted 142 years the old bridge was a real monument to the men who built it.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:19 PM

Firelock76
Good looking bridge!

If I remember reading correctly, the old 1875 bridge was offered to the state of New York as part of a hiking trail, but the state demurred, so it's coming down.

Too bad, having lasted 142 years the old bridge was a real monument to the men who built it.

Also a monument to our legitous society with the State of New York not wanting it.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,862 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:20 PM

Firelock76
If I remember reading correctly, the old 1875 bridge was offered to the state of New York as part of a hiking trail, but the state demurred, so it's coming down.

The state is too busy trying to tear up perfectly good tracks to build a trail.  They don't have time to use something being offered to them sans rails already...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 7:59 PM

      Judging from the video, what the existing bridge lacks in weight carrying capacity it seems to make up for in train speed. Whistling

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,288 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 8:51 PM

   Why is the re-bar green?  I've never seen that.   Is there a coating on the steel?

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,400 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 9:03 PM

The bridge is in Letchworth State Park over the Genesee River Gorge, the "Grand Canyon of the East".  I doubt they want an extra unsightly old bridge to mar the scenery.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,862 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 9:50 PM

Paul of Covington

   Why is the re-bar green?  I've never seen that.   Is there a coating on the steel?

Very common around here.  It is coated with epoxy, and intended for environments where corrosives (such as road salt) will be expected.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,825 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, December 12, 2017 11:30 PM

Mentioned is that is going to be a 286,000# capacity.  What happened to the 315,000#  often mentioned in other threads ?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 7:47 AM

blue streak 1
Mentioned is that is going to be a 286,000# capacity.  What happened to the 315,000#  often mentioned in other threads ?

286K is the current Standard.  315K is something that the industry is working toward making a stadard.  At this point in time it is not a certainty that 315K will become the future standard.

I suspect, but don't know, that the bridge probably has been designed to support loading far in excess of 315K, they just are not making the claim.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 12:35 PM

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy