Trains.com

BNSF in Western Wisconsin

1607 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Wednesday, July 26, 2017 10:31 AM

kgbw49, am aware of the Burlington's fast running.  The joint UP/BNSF route would be roughly 8 miles shorter Chicago Union to Rochelle.  Would use the north end of Union rather than the south.  Going west, the City trains when on the Northwestern stopped at Oak Park and then Clinton, IA, and the Zephyrs stopped at Aurora and then Oregon,IL, so it's difficult to determine what the times were to Rochelle.  Much of the Northwestern's route was/is arrow straight though, with a similar commuter district.  

I can't get this to link, but here are Zephyr avg. speeds from 1940 (!!!)

The Burlington Race Track - Chicago to St. Paul Speeds - 1940 
The Burlington diesel-electric powered lightweight Zephyr's were faster than any steam locomotive powered passenger trains in the 30's and 40's. Though the Pennsylvania west lines and the Milwaukee Road, and Northwestern Chicago to St. Paul runs also showed great speeds with great steam power (4-6-2 K4s Pacifics on the Pennsy and 4-4-0 Atlantics on the Milwaukee) the performance of the Zephyrs unveiled the ultimate fate of steam power, which was all gone by 1960. 
The chart below shows start to stop speeds of 60 mph or greater, with Zephyr speeds in the 1940's.

 

Train
#
From City
To City
Miles
Min.
mph
Morning Zephyr
6
E.Dubuque
Pr.Du Chein
55
39
84.6
Morning Zephyr
6
Pr.Du Chein
La Crosse
58
43
80.9
Morning Zephyr
22
La Crosse
Pr.Du Chein
58
43
80.9
Afternoon Zephyr
24
La Crosse
Pr.Du Chein
58
43
80.9
Afternoon Zephyr
23
Pr.Du Chein
La Crosse
58
45
77.3
Afternoon Zephyr
23
N.La Crosse
Winona Jct
27
21
77.1
Morning Zephyr
6
Aurora
Oregon
60
48
75.0
Morning Zephyr
6
N.La Crosse
Winona Jct
27
22
73.6
Morning Zephyr
22
St. Paul
Winona Jct
101
84
72.1
Morning Zephyr
22
Pr.Du Chein
E.Dubuque
55
46
71.7
Afternoon Zephyr
23
E.Dubuque
Pr.Du Chein
55
46
71.7
Afternoon Zephyr
24
St. Paul
Winona Jct
101
85
71.3
Mourning Zephyr
6
Chicago
Aurora
38
32
71.3
Afternoon Zephyr
23
Chicago
Aurora
38
32
71.3
Morning Zephyr
22
Winona Jct
N.La Crosse
27
23
70.4
Afternoon Zephyr
24
Winona Jct
N.La Crosse
27
23
70.4
Afternoon Zephyr
24
Pr.Du Chein
E.Dubuque
55
47
70.2
Afternoon Zephyr
23
Aurora
Oregon
60
52
69.2
Morning Zephyr
6
Oregon
Savannah
47
42
67.1
Afternoon Zephyr
24
Savannah
Oregon
47
42
67.1
Morning Zephyr
22
Oregon
Aurora
60
54
66.7
Afternoon Zephyr
24
Oregon
Aurora
60
54
66.7
Morning Zephyr
6
Winona Jct
St. Paul
101
91
66.6
Afternoon Zephyr
23
Savannah
E.Dubuque
39
36
65.0
Afternoon Zephyr
23
Winona Jct
St. Paul
101
94
64.5
Morning Zephyr
22
Savannah
Oregon
47
44
64.1
Morning Zephyr
6
Savannah
E.Dubuque
39
37
63.2
Morning Zephyr
22
E.Dubuque
Savannah
39
37
63.2
Afternoon Zephyr
24
E.Dubuque
Savannah
39
37
63.2
Afternoon Zephyr
23
Oregon
Savannah
47
45
62.7
Morning Zephyr
22
Aurora
Chicago
38
38
60.0
   
Average Speed
 
1662
1425
70.0

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:51 AM

kgbw49

BNSF does have a fast route Between Chicago and the Twin Cities. It is single track CTC from Chicago to East Dubuque where a line from Galesburg joins in. Then it is two main track for probably 95% of the rest of the way up to St. Paul, as previously mentioned, and the trains just ROLL on this fast piece of railroad. It is quite the show.

 

It is single track to just east of Savanna.  And that single track line from there to Aurora used to boast some very fast (70 mph +) runs in Steffee's annual report over extended distances.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, July 26, 2017 5:30 AM

BNSF does have a fast route Between Chicago and the Twin Cities. It is single track CTC from Chicago to East Dubuque where a line from Galesburg joins in. Then it is two main track for probably 95% of the rest of the way up to St. Paul, as previously mentioned, and the trains just ROLL on this fast piece of railroad. It is quite the show.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Tuesday, July 25, 2017 3:15 PM

I recall reading in Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy history that 100 years or so ago, the entire main line from Savanna, Il north to the Twin Cities was rebuilt.  Many, many miles of curvature were eliminated as a result of the reconstruction, in effect creating a super railroad, which set the stage in future years for the world class high speeds the Zephyrs achieved along the route.

I've often thought, wouldn't it be neat if the northeast connection between BNSF and UP at the Rochelle diamonds were restored (that is seen through the webcam)?  What a fast Chicago-St.Paul run that could be created using the combined UP/BNSF route?  

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Monday, July 24, 2017 7:26 AM

BNSF is largely a two-main-track racetrack up the east side of the Mississippi, from roughly East Dubuque, IL all the way up to St. Paul, MN, with the exceptions being several very short stretches with single track river crossings. This is the route of the  Twin Cities Zephyr back in the day. The trains really roll on the BNSF route up the east side of the Mississippi. The curvature for the most part is broad and sweeping, allowing for fast running.

On the west side there are two distinct track segments for the CP.

North of La Crescent, MN is the former route of the Twin Cities Hiawatha and it still hosts Amtrak Empire Builder Service. This line used to be double track but was single-tracked several decades ago. For the most part it too has broad sweeping curves to allow for some decent freight train speeds.

South of La Cescent, MN to Dubuque, IA is all single track with much more tight curvature and hence lower speeds.

 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
BNSF in Western Wisconsin
Posted by CMStPnP on Monday, July 24, 2017 2:12 AM

Nice shots along the Mississippi River.    Surprised at the single track and tight curves in places.    I would have thought the BNSF was mostly double track and a lot more straight in alignment in Western Wisconsin but it looks like the bluffs and private property and river leaves them little other choice in places.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HldvMN0X1yY&t=11s

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy