Trains.com

Trackside with Trains Vol. 301 'Hump Yards'

1410 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, April 19, 2017 12:09 PM

Wish I could watch from the top of Clearing's hump with cuts going in both directions at once.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • From: Flint or Grand Rapids, Mi or Elkhart, It Depends on the day
  • 573 posts
Posted by BOB WITHORN on Wednesday, April 19, 2017 11:44 AM
West Colton was very impressive when I was there in the 80's. Uncle worked there and each time I hit Cal. He'd take me up in the hump tower to watch. Quite something to watch a 2 track hump in action.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Monday, April 17, 2017 3:14 PM
The two types of railfans
from Trains January 1985  p. 22
"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 75 posts
Posted by highgreen on Friday, April 14, 2017 5:35 PM

Following and voting for the photos on "Trackside with Trains, vol...." over the years, I've noticed two broad types of voters. One type likes what I'll call "documentary" or journalistic photography. It records what's on the scene the way a company P.R. photographer would. In the volume on "hump yards," Bob Jordan's and Frank Orona's photos are examples of such photography.

Then we have what I'd call "off beat" or "creative" (be careful here! - all photography is a creative act) or "fine arts" photography. Scott Ridenhour's and Jim Evans' entries are, in my opinion, examples of that. (A disappearing hump track? Oh, my!) Brian Schmidt's photo straddles the fence between the two types.

I'm not fool enough to say I like one type better than the other. For some readers, "them's fightin' words." Sometimes one type tells the story better than another for a given subject. I'm just pointing out that these two types of images have a long and respectable history in railroad photography.

Making the image work to tell the story - documentary (journalstic) or fine arts - you be the judge as to which works better in a given situation.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:55 AM

I preferred Bob Jordan's submission since it included the hump towers. 

Surprised that the moderators did not make it a "sticky" so it didn't get bumped off the initial index screen.  Not many people have participated in the voting as a result.

John

Moderator
  • Member since
    April 2013
  • 187 posts
Trackside with Trains Vol. 301 'Hump Yards'
Posted by Steve Sweeney on Monday, April 10, 2017 9:16 AM

Voting is open for Trackside with Trains Vol. 301: "Hump Yards" Whose photo says it best? Voting is open through April 16.

http://trn.trains.com/photos-videos/trackside/2017/04/vol-301-hump-yards

 

Steve Sweeney
Digital Editor, Hobby 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy