Trains.com

Question about doublestack intermodal

919 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Question about doublestack intermodal
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:07 PM
I've seen close-up photos of doublestack intermodal cars, like this one
for example http://www.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/view.cgi?image=Scotch_Block_21.05.04_2409.jpg

and it looks like top container is not secured in any way, just placed on top.
Are there any hidden straps anywhere ? It would seem to me that on hard turns or sudden braking container can at least shift if not fall off completely.

I guess by the nature of my question one can guess that I am not a pro [:)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 8, 2004 4:27 AM
Yes M.W. is right. The top box is pin down to the bottom box with a pin that is turn a 1/4 of a turn to the bottom. The bottom is pin to the car. Not much but think? Their is a bout 2 inch pr wheel on the rail a given time.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: NY
  • 913 posts
Posted by dwil89 on Thursday, December 9, 2004 7:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Rail Road Robby

Yes M.W. is right. The top box is pin down to the bottom box with a pin that is turn a 1/4 of a turn to the bottom. The bottom is pin to the car. Not much but think? Their is a bout 2 inch pr wheel on the rail a given time.

I guess that mounting method is fine...the only time would be a problem would be if the train left the rails, then gravity would take over....Dave Williams http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nsaltoonajohnstown
David J. Williams http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nsaltoonajohnstown
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Athens, GA
  • 549 posts
Posted by Dough on Thursday, December 9, 2004 7:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dwil89

QUOTE: Originally posted by Rail Road Robby

Yes M.W. is right. The top box is pin down to the bottom box with a pin that is turn a 1/4 of a turn to the bottom. The bottom is pin to the car. Not much but think? Their is a bout 2 inch pr wheel on the rail a given time.

I guess that mounting method is fine...the only time would be a problem would be if the train left the rails, then gravity would take over....Dave Williams http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nsaltoonajohnstown


Funny that you should mention that. A few years ago, a drunk driver slammed into the middle of a hot intermodel in Oakwood, GA. It managed to cause a derail and sent quite a few containers cars and containers flying. The cars stayed pretty close to the tracks, although they completly stripped everything down to roadbed.

The scarry part was those containers that just went sailing! Some of them must have gone over 100 feet! I remember one that busted open and you could see the paper products. Another had refrigirators. What is incredible is that they all went to the right side where there was nothing, but grass. On the left side was a house that sat right on the right of way. I can't imagine what it must have sounded like in that house, and I would hate to think what loaded containers hitting a house at sixty miles per hour would have done!
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, December 9, 2004 10:06 PM
Did SP or UP sell those SP (SPDU) containers?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, December 9, 2004 10:45 PM
Large storm waves have been known to knock containers off from ships at sea. Probabily the most notorious example was a container of athletic shoes lost a sea in a storm many years ago. Since the location of the ship was known at the time of the storm, and since athletic shoes float, researchers were able to understand a lot about Pacific ocean currents by recording beach sitings of that particular shoe.

dd
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Pennnsylvania
  • 136 posts
Posted by jrw249 on Thursday, December 9, 2004 11:57 PM
How are smaller containers attached if they are on top of a longer container.( i.e There are no corners to attach the pins.)
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Friday, December 10, 2004 12:38 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

Good question. They don't connect that way. One 40/45/48/53/57-foot can stack on top of two 20s, but there is no way to connect them the other way around. One 45/48/53/57 can stack on top of one 40. And so forth.

For info on lost containers, some nice photos of a stack failure, and all the interesting stuff that's bobbing around in the oceans, see
http://www.cargolaw.com/2004nightmare_unstacked.html

For general information on containers, see
http://www.robl.w1.com/Transport/intermod.htm


The second link has a good explanation of container stacking in the "Movement by Rail" section.

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy