Article in the paper today quotes the NTSB as saying the train was going 10 M.P.H. when the derailment occured. The article then said that 3 of the derailled cars were the old type, and launched into a a huge article about the sky falling.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
Protocall is that conductor goes back as far as he chooses, pulls the pin and crew moves out of the immediate area what they can.
Mac McCulloch
Deggesty If I am going cyclic I prefer cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine. My, how conventions have changed in the last fifty-seven years!
If I am going cyclic I prefer cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine.
My, how conventions have changed in the last fifty-seven years!
DEG don't you just love organic chemistry? Never could undersand how to figure the molecular structure.
Question. What is the protocol for disconnecting the locos and in this case the buffer car from a derailment ? One has to wonder if the front of the train has a serious derailment how long should it take to disconnect and maybe should there be a remote way to disconnect ?
Of course if train separates just drag cars attached to locos even with emergency brakes applied.
.
Andrew Falconer Will the derailment cause the replacement of all the old rail and ties with new rail and new ties, so it does not happen again?
Will the derailment cause the replacement of all the old rail and ties with new rail and new ties, so it does not happen again?
Rail and ties that can be salvaged and used again will be.
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
Deggesty Wizlish If I am going cyclic I prefer cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine. My, how conventions have changed in the last fifty-seven years!
Wizlish If I am going cyclic I prefer cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine.
You have no idea! The current IUPAC name for the stuff is 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine, which I find almost incomprehensibly complecticated.
Wizlish Deggesty Watch out for 2,4.6-trinitrotoluene If I am going cyclic I prefer cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine.
Deggesty Watch out for 2,4.6-trinitrotoluene
Johnny
DeggestyWatch out for 2,4.6-trinitrotoluene
caldreamer Although most aviation gasoline is 100LL there are special high octane aViation gasolines used by the military us as JP7 and JP8/
Although most aviation gasoline is 100LL there are special high octane aViation gasolines used by the military us as JP7 and JP8/
Those are jet fuel not gasoline.
Norm
Those are not gasoline. JP (jet propellant) means jet or turbine fuel.
Wizlish Deggesty ... iso octane (or, isooctane) is highly branched--two methyl (CH3) groups on the second carbon in the chain and one methyl group on the fourth carbon. And, iso octane has an octane rating of 100; n-heptane (seven carbon atoms in a straight chain) has an octane rating of zero. Currently known in IUPAC as the dreaded 2.2.4-trimethylpentane. A picture worth a thousand words: How did you get that snazzy subscript to work in our BBcode? BTW, as an aside neither end of the 'octane' scale is fixed -- ethanol and LPG both have research octane numbers higher than 100, and aviation gasoline used to go as high as "140LL" through the use of tetraethyl lead. There is now a no-lead "100 octane" with the proper low vapor pressure for aircraft use -- I believe it is blended with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (anyone know how resonant this is?). At the other end, plain straight-chain octane has a RON of NEGATIVE 19 according to an orgo text I have seen.
Deggesty ... iso octane (or, isooctane) is highly branched--two methyl (CH3) groups on the second carbon in the chain and one methyl group on the fourth carbon. And, iso octane has an octane rating of 100; n-heptane (seven carbon atoms in a straight chain) has an octane rating of zero.
Currently known in IUPAC as the dreaded 2.2.4-trimethylpentane. A picture worth a thousand words:
How did you get that snazzy subscript to work in our BBcode?
BTW, as an aside neither end of the 'octane' scale is fixed -- ethanol and LPG both have research octane numbers higher than 100, and aviation gasoline used to go as high as "140LL" through the use of tetraethyl lead. There is now a no-lead "100 octane" with the proper low vapor pressure for aircraft use -- I believe it is blended with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (anyone know how resonant this is?).
At the other end, plain straight-chain octane has a RON of NEGATIVE 19 according to an orgo text I have seen.
Your mention of the cyclic 1-3-5 trimethly benzene reminds me that years ago I was told that the gasoline found in Europe is cyclic, and not aliphatic. (for the benefit of the non-chemists who enjoy these forums, cyclic compounds have rings with all sorts of substitutions for this or that hydrogen on the outsides of the rings, and aliphatics are basically straight chains with all sorts of branchings and substitutions possible)
Watch out for 2-4-6 trinitro toluene.
You need to read this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avgas.
The ONLY avgas you're likely to find these days is 100LL. The unleadeds are still in the development and testing stage and the heavily leaded ones are no longer available.
Less than 25MPH, you are in the bottom of a sag for Prairie Creek (Br 596.7) and running on tired 90# jointed rail unless something changed in recent history.
(you can do all you want to with surfacing and ties, but rail joint memory from years of minimal or no maintenance in the past won't go away easilly. Add in open deck timber pile spans and poor soils and the result is . That roadmaster is a busy fella even without the mechanical and operating wildcards added. )
As Wizlish says, octane is not necessarily a straight chain hydrocarbon--indeed, iso octane (or, isooctane) is highly branched--two methyl (CH3) groups on the second carbon in the chain and one methyl group on the fourth carbon. And, iso octane has an octane rating of 100; n-heptane (seven carbon atoms in a straight chain) has an octane rating of zero.
Excellent! Couldn't have said it better.
A bit more complicated. The basis of crude oil is hydrocarbons - chemicals made up only of carbon backbones with attached hydrogens. The 'simpler' ones have only a single chain, the shorter of which are gases (methane, for example, a major constituent in natural gas, CH4, or propane, C3H8). Your 'cetane' (properly spelled) is a C20 chain (named after whale oil) and is the 'reference' for diesel fuel as octane (C8, but not necessarily straight-chain) is the reference for gasoline.
As an aside, substituting a hydroxyl radical (-OH) for one of the hydrogens can convert a hydrocarbon to an alcohol. Methane becomes methanol, or wood alcohol, and ethane (C2H6) becomes ethanol, C2H5OH, the ethyl alcohol that's in alcoholic drinks. Note that substituting the hydroxyl makes the gases into liquids, but even so, you can't shove them into pipelines until you reach butanol ... which isn't cheaply made by fermentation as ethanol is.
Here is the situation with BLEVE as it applies to Bakken 'explosions' -- and with analogy as midget noted to steam boiler explosions. The problem is not that the gases segregate inside the car; it is that they remain dissolved in the liquid crude under pressure as it becomes heated. When pressure is relieved, the gas components expand dramatically as small bubbles within the liquid, as when a soda bottle is dropped and then opened. Note that the 'shove' from these bubbles is cumulative outward from the center,and the periphery of the liquid hence experiences high acceleration; if there is space between the liquid surface and the wall of the tank or vessel that encloses it, this acceleration can build up very high momentum that then produces hydraulic shock when it hits the tank wall. This is a force much higher than what would be produced by equilibrium pressure, and it also produces very fast expansion and evolution of much of the liquid oil carried along entrained with the expanding gas. This is what produces the very dramatic large expanding gas clouds, as in the famous CSX New River clouds, which looked dramatic as hell but -- you will notice -- featured neither detonation propagation speed nor blast.
I would add something to this definition - part of what is commonly called a BLEVE is actually a sequel, a vapor cloud explosion or VCE, which includes the energy release within the expanding vapor cloud if it 'catches fire'. This includes the unique feature of the critical-mixture explosion,where the expanding vapor cloud mixes with sufficient air for prompt combustion and, on ignition, the whole mass of the cloud reacts as quickly as reaction-transition temperature is reached -- if the ignition is within the cloud, or can be initiated by a shockwave or shock heating, the speed can produce a detonation rather than deflagration.
More BS. No such thing as "ketane". Like all petroleum products, gasoline is a mixture. Chevron SDS shows 12 ingredients. It does not explode in an engine. It burns at a controlled rate. Obviously when vaporized and mixed with air it burns faster. Any liquid in an enclosed vessel can produce a "bleve" when the pressure is enough to burst the vessel. This is commonly complicated by heat weakening the vessel.
The difference, in this case might be that there is a substantial difference in the flash points of gasoline, many of it's ingredeients are present in a light crude oil, and ethyl alcohol. The difference is about 100 degrees F. which makes ignition much more likely.
Murphy Siding tdmidget Randy Stahl crude oil explodes Care to explain that? It's a flammable liquid, not an explosive. Isn't it the vapors that explode?
tdmidget Randy Stahl crude oil explodes Care to explain that? It's a flammable liquid, not an explosive.
Randy Stahl crude oil explodes Care to explain that? It's a flammable liquid, not an explosive.
crude oil explodes
Care to explain that? It's a flammable liquid, not an explosive.
Isn't it the vapors that explode?
I've always been intrigued by the use of the terms "flamable and "inflamable."
Simple. Crude oil consists of many components of oil. Some crude contains propane (camping fuel), butane (cigarette lighters), ketane (gasoline) and many other components. Heavy crude contains more of the bunker b and c oils and tar components but the light Baken Crude contains much more of the volatile gasses that will explode. I thought you should have learned this by now if you have been following these stories for the last year. The Baken needs to be degassed to reduce its volatility. So after being shaken and bounced by the train, mixed with the air in the car and then exposed to a spark or flame, the gasses can and too often do explode. Just like they do in your automobiles cylinders.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Scotland,+SD+57059/@43.0879962,-97.6761092,435m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x878f615fde4bfa9b:0x8ddb4cfe717eb8d1!6m1!1e1 This seems to be the spot. It looked like quite a bridge for what looks like a babbling brook in 2-D.
caldreamer Three GOOD things about this derailment. 1. There were no injuries ofr fatalities. 2. It occurred in the middle of no where, so no civilians or structures were in danger. 3. It was ethanol which will burn but NOT explode like crude oil.
Three GOOD things about this derailment.
1. There were no injuries ofr fatalities.
2. It occurred in the middle of no where, so no civilians or structures were in danger.
3. It was ethanol which will burn but NOT explode like crude oil.
Crude oil does not explode. It burns. When contained It can result in a Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion. That has nothing to do with flamability. Water can produce a BLEVE.
I live about an hour away from this derailment. In fact, if the train hadn't derailed, it would have passed by on the tracks 6 blocks from my house. Our local paper, the Sioux Falls, SD Argus Leader-the state's biggest newspaper put an article about the derailment on page 7 of section C. I can understand the confusion about who owns the tracks. It was a Milwaukee Road line that had been taken over by the state of SD and had money pumped into it. A few years back, the line was sold to BNSF.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.