Trains.com

Raton Pass Question

10432 views
73 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 267 posts
Raton Pass Question
Posted by CatFoodFlambe on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 4:55 PM

There are many stories about the completion of the Raton Pass route and the competition between the Rio Grande and the Santa Fe to secure the route that BNSF would gladly rip out today (if they could ensure no competitor would propose taking over the line.. Confused.   My question - with the 3% grades and other operational difficulties, I don't fully understand why either of the two roads didn't just swing a few dozen miles to the east and build "around" the Sangre De Christo Range and save all the elevation changes. 

Full disclosure - I've never been to the eastern CO/NM border area - the net up-and-down may have been just as expensive given the extra mileage involved.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 6:20 PM

(1) Ever heard of the Cimarron Cut-Off (1912-1942)?

(2) Santa Fe Rocky Mountain & Eastern (Swastika Route)?

(3) Dawson Railway?

The "other way around" was a railroad to nowhere, to no water, to no marketable minerals and to NO people except the occasional wandering Indian. Multiple surveys* were made and filed - nothing was built. Plus  the Puratoire/Picketwire canyons were nasty (still are), as was Capulin/ Cimarron country.....

 

* ATSF, Kansas Pacific, CB&Q, CRIP (via Liberal and also Dodge City), and others.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 6:42 PM

mudchicken
Plus  the Purgatoire/Picketwire canyons were nasty (still are)

And Liberty Valence was still running loose north of the Picketwire.Big Smile

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 6:50 PM

I never saw him in all my years around La Junta/ Las Animas.  Diningcar?Wink

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 6:55 PM

Friend and college MC has already responded with incite and I shall offer this:

When Santa fe was at Granada, (now the station of Barton) following completion and securing the Land Grant through Kansas they did indeed survey (reconisance) the route you suggest. It was indeed lower and shorter than the Raton Pass line which Santa Fe eventually built. But there was at that time no source of - revenue, water for steam engines and timber for ties and bridges.

Santa Fe's competition was building into Colorado where all of these things were available, but most importantly the revenue from the mining that was prevalent in large quantatives at that time; and certainly needed for a newly established RR.

Later Santa Fe did look to build the 'Colmor Cutoff' from Dodge City, KS to the location 'Colmor' located some 40 miles south of Raton. They did indeed build part of it but what is now the TRANSCON LINE east from Belen was already established with lesser grades and a much shorter connection to the Texas revenue which was established and growing.

In retrospect we now see the wisdom of those decisions with th Raton Pass line not needed for the present and foreseeable traffic.

 

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:11 PM

The gradients that I’ve seen listed consistently show it as 3.5%.  Ouch!  No wonder that BNSF does not use Raton Pass!

 

Years ago, in the heyday of the passenger train, AT&SF could zip up Raton with little effort.  But, that zipping doesn’t happen with today’s long, sometimes heavy freights.

 

Need I say more?

 

Here in Southern California, surveyor Fred Perris staked out a line circa 1880 from San Diego, through the now famous Cajon Pass, to Barstow.  I guess for expediency, he utilized a few 3% sections.  Interestingly, today BNSF in Cajon Pass does not normally allow heavy downward trains to utilize the 3% line, only the 2.2% line.  In light of Raton’s 3.5% grade, it is little wonder BNSF does NOT traverse the line.

 

Circa 2008 BNSF spend $80 million to add a third main to Cajon Pass for about 16 miles.  To alter Raton Pass to make it freight friendly might cost $1 BILLION.  No politicians have offered such a big sum, even in the name of National Security.  There must be a reason for that …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:14 PM
Being older (a lot) than friend MC I can attest without any chance of being challenged (because those who told the stories are long gone) that Liberty Valance did roam the Picketwire, the JJ Ranch and the large open range controlled by the Thatcher and Bloom Ranch. I was told of those wild days by men who as youngsters saw and heard there fathers recite tales of those days (1865-1900).
There was Robbers Roost located near the New Mexico border south of Las Animas where desparados hid. There were shootings in Las Animas after the Kansas Pacific and the Santa FE reached there.  Research the name Clay Allison if you wish to learnmore.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:02 PM

Mischief Well heck, let's get the track crew from the Blazing Saddles movie to build us a line from Raton Pass to Tennessee Pass via Alamosa, so's we can just run trains up the one and down the other . . . [ducks to avoid objects thrown by mudchicken and diningcar . . . Smile, Wink & Grin ).

- Paul North.   

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:16 PM

FW&D and the EP&SW (Dawson railway) blocked any diversion to the East.

There do appear to be a pair of canyons to the west that could be part of a new route with a summit of similar height if desired, at around 36°56'33.70"N, 104°44'40.78"W. Clearly, though, there is no demand for such a line and the EP&SW could probably be rebuilt for less. 

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 9:06 PM

NorthWest

FW&D and the EP&SW (Dawson railway) blocked any diversion to the East.

There do appear to be a pair of canyons to the west that could be part of a new route with a summit of similar height if desired, at around 36°56'33.70"N, 104°44'40.78"W. Clearly, though, there is no demand for such a line and the EP&SW could probably be rebuilt for less. 

 

ATSF Colmor Cutoff (what was built of it) utilized trackage rights on the FW&D (IIRC between Clayton and Mt Dora.)  I'm not sure how you mean that the Dawson line would have blocked any diversion to th east.  I think the final obstacle to the cutoff was the Canadian River Canyon.

The C&S Long Canyon branch went around west of the pass you geo-referenced.  D&RG also graded up to a pass to the west of Raton and east of your reference.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 9:57 PM

What I meant was that the obvious and easy route was taken, and the Santa Fe could not continue roughly due west of Boise City and use it.

I hadn't actually ever heard of the Colmer Cutoff before, and it is interesting. http://www.abandonedrails.com/Colmor_Cut-off

I found one of the grades slightly west of the marker, but could not find one to the east. I selected that point as it is the closest the canyons get and would require the least amount of grades.

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Fountain Valley, CA, USA
  • 607 posts
Posted by garyla on Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:03 AM

Dead

Paul_D_North_Jr

Mischief Well heck, let's get the track crew from the Blazing Saddles movie to build us a line from Raton Pass to Tennessee Pass via Alamosa, so's we can just run trains up the one and down the other . . . [ducks to avoid objects thrown by mudchicken and diningcar . . . Smile, Wink & Grin ).

- Paul North.   

 

Great concept, but I can picture those bums sleepin' on the job when it couldn't be more than 114 degrees out there!  Dead

If I ever met a train I didn't like, I can't remember when it happened!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, August 27, 2015 12:46 PM

NorthWest

What I meant was that the obvious and easy route was taken, and the Santa Fe could not continue roughly due west of Boise City and use it.

I hadn't actually ever heard of the Colmer Cutoff before, and it is interesting. http://www.abandonedrails.com/Colmor_Cut-off

I found one of the grades slightly west of the marker, but could not find one to the east. I selected that point as it is the closest the canyons get and would require the least amount of grades. 

Methinks you have a trip to Farley, NM in your future. Just getting there will double the size of the town. (Plenty of buildings you could move intoCowboy)...Hope you have enough gas to get back to civilizationSmile, Wink & Grin.

One of the problems from Farley to Colmor was very "loose" ground and driving bridge piling to bearing was difficult or impossible. The loess & ash out there was really poor stuff to build embankment with.

(1) the warped 3.5% myth is getting pushed again (Baloney, unless you are talking about some kind of skewed average....)

(2) as late as the 1990's, there were proposals floated to put The Dawson Railway back in and bypass Glorietta Hill. (The Dawson RR also had its flaws ... fun in Mountain Country)

(3) The connections at Mt. Dora and Clayton are still very visible.

(4) The BNSF (C&S/FW&D) Twin Mountain Sub from Trinidad to Texline also has some nightmare properties that may kill it off in the future.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:15 PM

garyla

Dead

 
Paul_D_North_Jr

Mischief Well heck, let's get the track crew from the Blazing Saddles movie to build us a line from Raton Pass to Tennessee Pass via Alamosa, so's we can just run trains up the one and down the other . . . [ducks to avoid objects thrown by mudchicken and diningcar . . . Smile, Wink & Grin ).

- Paul North.   

 

 

Great concept, but I can picture those bums sleepin' on the job when it couldn't be more than 114 degrees out there!  Dead

 

Try building it in the winter with the snow blowing sideways and coating everything in ice. Think we can nominate from the forum who gets to be Headley Lamar, the Governor and Taggart.  

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:56 PM

mudchicken

 

 
garyla

Dead

 
Paul_D_North_Jr

Mischief Well heck, let's get the track crew from the Blazing Saddles movie to build us a line from Raton Pass to Tennessee Pass via Alamosa, so's we can just run trains up the one and down the other . . . [ducks to avoid objects thrown by mudchicken and diningcar . . . Smile, Wink & Grin ).

- Paul North.   

 

 

Great concept, but I can picture those bums sleepin' on the job when it couldn't be more than 114 degrees out there!  Dead

 

 

 

Try building it in the winter with the snow blowing sideways and coating everything in ice. Think we can nominate from the forum who gets to be Headley Lamar, the Governor and Taggart.  

 

 

 

Nevermind that ****, Here comes Mongo!!!

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:29 PM

Thanks for your comments and knowledge, MC. I am lost as to your point with 1, but I think I understand the rest.

They're going to move everything to the Boise City Sub?

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:40 PM

mudchicken

...

(2) as late as the 1990's, there were proposals floated to put The Dawson Railway back in and bypass Glorietta Hill. (The Dawson RR also had its flaws ... fun in Mountain Country)

...

 

Was this mainly for the York Canyon coal trains so that they could avoid Glorietta Pass?  How would the route connect from Tucumcari to the rest of the ATSF?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:04 PM

NorthWest

Thanks for your comments and knowledge, MC. I am lost as to your point with 1, but I think I understand the rest.

They're going to move everything to the Boise City Sub?

 

Right now it's loads down the Boise City/Dumas Subs (ATSF)  and empties back up the old BN to Trinidad and then either up the ATSF  or the old C&S (Still the Crooked & SLOW)... If Branson to Trinchera starts failing again, bye-bye C&S/FW&D...So far the bid band-aid job of the late 90's has worked. Boise City Sub was built to a much higher standard in 1932-1936 then the 1886-1910 D&RG/C&S Joint line and all its multiple iterations of line changes...ATSF route, hands down, Pueblo to Amarillo is far superior and faster with lighter curves and grades than the BN/C&S route, even without signals below Las Animas. (J A Noble and that generation got it right!) 
 
 as for (1) ... Max grade is 4.03% at Morley, right opposite the tailing pile and then uphill (has always been, sent to remeasure more than once by the dis-believing operating dolts in suits back east.)
 
Survival of the BN route is dependent on whether the current adult supervision is Team Chico or Team Cascade Green (Borg Nation).
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:30 PM

MidlandMike
 
mudchicken

...

(2) as late as the 1990's, there were proposals floated to put The Dawson Railway back in and bypass Glorietta Hill. (The Dawson RR also had its flaws ... fun in Mountain Country)

...

 

 

 

Was this mainly for the York Canyon coal trains so that they could avoid Glorietta Pass?  How would the route connect from Tucumcari to the rest of the ATSF?

 

Not really -think (1) ATSF Northern Route alternate transcon and (2) a connection at Vaughn for a better pacific NW to Texas alternative to BN in the Shouldn't Paint So Fast era.

Everybody forgets about the EB challenge on Glorietta w/ heavy freight, such is the obsession w/ Raton. Passenger trains is one thing - freight is quite another.

(LC claimed the rights to Mongo many moons ago)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:32 PM

M-Mike, The Tucumcari SP-UP line crosses the Santa Fe-BNSF at Vaughn, NM and a connection could have been constructed, but as MC points out the suits just see  lines on a map and believe it will work When they are shown the costs and the negative operational features they pretend they did not have the idea.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:33 PM

MidlandMike
 
mudchicken

...

(2) as late as the 1990's, there were proposals floated to put The Dawson Railway back in and bypass Glorietta Hill. (The Dawson RR also had its flaws ... fun in Mountain Country)

...

 

 

 

Was this mainly for the York Canyon coal trains so that they could avoid Glorietta Pass?  How would the route connect from Tucumcari to the rest of the ATSF?

 

MidlandMike
 
mudchicken

...

(2) as late as the 1990's, there were proposals floated to put The Dawson Railway back in and bypass Glorietta Hill. (The Dawson RR also had its flaws ... fun in Mountain Country)

...

 

 

 

Was this mainly for the York Canyon coal trains so that they could avoid Glorietta Pass?  How would the route connect from Tucumcari to the rest of the ATSF?

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Sunday, August 30, 2015 3:47 PM

mudchicken
Max grade is 4.03% at Morley

The chart says the 4.03% is 300 ft long. If we can believe the chart, the steepest half-mile on Raton doesn't average more than 3.5% actual.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • 23 posts
Posted by GTCN on Tuesday, September 1, 2015 12:37 AM

The mountains were a two edged sword. They were an operational headache, but also a source of revenue. In the Raton area this was coal, timber, and other traffic that traveled the Santa Fe Trail. 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1 posts
Posted by MR ROBERT L PRIOR on Wednesday, September 2, 2015 3:53 PM

CatFoodFlambe

There are many stories about the completion of the Raton Pass route and the competition between the Rio Grande and the Santa Fe to secure the route that BNSF would gladly rip out today (if they could ensure no competitor would propose taking over the line.. Confused.   My question - with the 3% grades and other operational difficulties, I don't fully understand why either of the two roads didn't just swing a few dozen miles to the east and build "around" the Sangre De Christo Range and save all the elevation changes. 

Full disclosure - I've never been to the eastern CO/NM border area - the net up-and-down may have been just as expensive given the extra mileage involved.

 

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, September 3, 2015 7:47 PM

timz
mudchicken
Max grade is 4.03% at Morley

The chart says the 4.03% is 300 ft long. If we can believe the chart, the steepest half-mile on Raton doesn't average more than 3.5% actual.

Any curves in that stretch to be compensated for, or conversely, would add to the nominal gradient ?

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Friday, September 4, 2015 7:46 AM

You are in tangent where the 4.03% sits (for about 750' IIRC), the curves get tighter uphill going towards the tunnels.

(the problem with the grades published in the track chart is that they were 1878 original top of subrade, don't include vertical curves and don't show T/R profile. There are places up there where it's a serious climb in the ballast shoulder to get up to top of tie level. UP's PMV vehicles have good relative data on what's out there today from their  GIS program. BNSF got sold a bill of goods [FLYMAP] that a buncha non-surveyor engineers bought into* and they are now busy playing catch-up.)

 

 

* "Hey! - I got coordinates" - Relative to what? Are they repeatable? Are they believable? (Precise? [NO] Accurate? [NO] Going to save BNSF big $$$$ in future design work and planning? Laugh)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Friday, September 4, 2015 12:49 PM

mudchicken
BNSF got sold a bill of goods [FLYMAP] that a buncha non-surveyor engineers bought into* and they are now busy playing catch-up.)

Is this the German company ("Navigation in Perfektion") that can't even figure out how to get an English-language Web site to work?

All the bells and whistles an air operation (or, BNSF probably noted, drone/UAV operation) would want ... railroads on the ground that have to be precisely aligned, not so much...

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Friday, September 4, 2015 5:16 PM

Paul_D_North_Jr
Any curves in that stretch to be compensated for, or conversely, would add to the nominal gradient ?

On the steep part, the chart shows a climb from 7004.9 to 7555.0 ft in (scaling off the chart) 17119 feet of the north track. So average actual grade for that distance comes out 3.21%.

Total curvature is about 803 degrees, which makes the average compensated grade 3.40%.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Saturday, November 21, 2020 12:03 PM
 

diningcar

Later Santa Fe did look to build the 'Colmor Cutoff' from Dodge City, KS to the location 'Colmor' located some 40 miles south of Raton. They did indeed build part of it but what is now the TRANSCON LINE east from Belen was already established with lesser grades and a much shorter connection to the Texas revenue which was established and growing

 
Are there any expansive information sources avaible on the proposed Colmor Cutoff? Seems interesting Santa Fe would make a move when the Belen Cutoff was already built.
 
 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Saturday, November 21, 2020 2:36 PM

Santa Fe always had New Mexico as a destination which its naming implies. In 1873 they had reached the Colorado state line thus fulfilling the obligation which gave them a large land grant. The reason for building toward the Colorado line was because on the route chosen there was water for steam locomotives, plus timber for ties and bridges and minerals for revenue in Colorado; little of which were available along the various southwesterly routes examined 

The Belen cutoff was built primarily to aid the freight business which had developed and was handicaped by the Raton Pass grades. Also the freight business between southern Texas and the west coast could now be moved expeditiously with the construction of a new line from Temple, TX connecting to the Belen cutoff at the location Texico, just east from Clovis.  

But passenger business was still solicited and mostly utilized the Raton Pass route. A study was made to reduce the Raton Pass constraints with a route between Dodge City and Colmor, NM. If Completed this line would have been sixty six miles shorter than the line through La Junta and Raton Pass with maximum grades of one percent and most curves two degrees or less. Speeds could be 75-100 MPH over much of the cutoff route. Money constraints eventually halted this construction at Farley, NM in November 1931, the beginning of the great depression. Farley was about 37 miles from the completion location at Colmor with a significant bridge needed over the Canadian River.

 

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy