Trains.com

Why is Tehachapi so important today?

4679 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 1,243 posts
Posted by Sunnyland on Monday, August 10, 2015 5:25 PM

Interesting to read the comments about why Tehachapi was built,etc.  I did ride around the Loop on the old SP Daylight and that was thrilling to see and be a part of.  Doesn't often happen today unless Amtrak does a reroute or special.  

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 105 posts
Posted by ouibejamn on Tuesday, August 4, 2015 7:22 PM

Chief409
As I recall, there is a low point on the Coast Sub where the tracks get flooded at very high tides

Elkhorn Slough, north of Salinas, near Santa Cruz.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Tuesday, August 4, 2015 4:21 PM

THIS pot hasn’t been stirred for years, so maybe it is time to re-stir it!

In Cajon Pass, BNSF 7-8 years ago laid a third track. (See Cajon Pass Triple-Tracking Updates)  They erected a signal bridge unlike the others they had erected, on a wider graded area than normal.

The speculation back then was that BNSF would someday get rights to haul trains over the UP Palmdale Cutoff, saving 40 miles or so by not having to go via Barstow on a Bay Area to Los Angeles trip.  What BNSF would exchange for getting the opportunity to do that is unknown, but if such happened, BNSF would be in a better position Bay Area-Los Angeles, which would make Tehachapi even more important to BNSF.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 2 posts
Posted by LLOYD A SWANSON on Tuesday, August 4, 2015 12:38 PM

Ulrich

Looking at the map of UP in California, there's a perfectly good line that runs from Oakland to LA along the coast.  The line through central California through the Tehachapi mountains is by all accounts tortorous in comparison to the route along the coast. So why was it built in the first place and why does it remain so important in this day and age?

 

All the other responses seem to forget that BNSF has no other way to get from the Bay area to LA or east than Tehachapi. Coast line is strictly UP.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Tuesday, August 4, 2015 8:36 AM

Having lived in northern California for many years and having been on trains on both routes, I can tell you thet the Valley route from Sacramento to Los Angeles is FLAT all the way down to the Tehachapei pass.  Trains runs quite fast as compared to the coast line whic his over the Pacific Coast mountain range.  The  line has many curves and the Cuesta grade is long and steep in both directions.  This means slower speeds than on the valley route.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Tuesday, August 4, 2015 12:36 AM

On the UP, Tehachapi Pass is basically a north-south I-5 Corridor pass.  For example, a Portland, OR to Los Angeles, CA train would have at least 100 miles extra to go via the Coast.  And, the Coast line is a curvy affair.   The practicality side of the matter dictates the Central Valley and Tehachapi Pass be the route of choice.

 

Of course, from the BNSF standpoint, via Tehachapi is the fastest route to the Bay Area from the east.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 1 posts
Posted by Chief409 on Monday, August 3, 2015 10:13 PM

As I recall, there is a low point on the Coast Sub where the tracks get flooded at very high tides. Also the curvature, Questa Grade, AMTRAK, Metrolink and the fact the railroads hubs (UP and BNSF) are east of LA, so freight traffic would need to be routed on very busy subdivisions to get to West Colton for the UP. Which is why the SP constructed the Palmdale Cutoff, to get freight out of the LA. The Saguas (now Metrolink Valley Sub) from Palmdale south, is used for Z intermodal to and from LATC and the "Rock Train".

Of course the Coast is a back up for the Fresno and Mojave Subs if there is a major incident on the Mojave Sub over Techachapi. But then, the Coast has problems with mudslides from Golata south along the coast to Ventura. I've seen AMTRAK reroutes over Techachapi more then once. Also becuase of the passenger train traffic, the Coast Sub can only absorb a limited amount of freight traffic, the UP starts rerouting traffic futher east, as does the BNSF when something happens on the Mojave Sub. Then the Coast reroutes mostly dry up when the short distance clog is cleared.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,919 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Saturday, July 25, 2015 10:12 PM

ericsp
Also, using the Coast Line means the trains would have to go through Los Angeles area with all of the Metrolink trains

Bingo!Bow

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Saturday, July 25, 2015 10:07 PM

If I remember correctly, the sidings on the Coast Line are generally short, and the MRVWCs/MWCRVs are usually very long. Also, using the Coast Line means the trains would have to go through Los Angeles area with all of the Metrolink trains.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Friday, July 24, 2015 10:16 PM

MidlandMike

The coast route has the Cuesta grade, although it is less than half as high as Tehachapi Pass.  Except for the Pass, the inland route is fairly strait thru the valley, whereas the costal route folllows the rugged coast.

 
Three other issues. The valley route is much shorter between Roseville and Colton. While Cuesta is lower than Tehachapi, the coast line has many little ups and downs plus another significant grade in the Chatsworth area. The up and down adds to fuel consumption which is a function of both mileage and total rise, mostly, and fall between terminals. BNSF trackage rights Between Bakersfield and Mojave about doubles tonnage on that segment.
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,442 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, July 24, 2015 9:26 PM

The coast route has the Cuesta grade, although it is less than half as high as Tehachapi Pass.  Except for the Pass, the inland route is fairly strait thru the valley, whereas the costal route folllows the rugged coast.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: San Francisco East Bay
  • 1,360 posts
Posted by MikeF90 on Friday, July 24, 2015 6:32 PM

Ulrich
Looking at the map of UP in California, there's a perfectly good line that runs from Oakland to LA along the coast.  The line through central California through the Tehachapi mountains is by all accounts tortorous in comparison to the route along the coast. So why was it built in the first place and why does it remain so important in this day and age?

It was completed by the SP in 1900 as an alternate to the older Tehachapi route shared with the Santa Fe; at the time there was far more north-south traffic to Los Angeles (especially agricultural products).

For today's freight traffic, the Coast line is pretty circuitious, longer and slow. The Tehachapi route is used as BNSF's primary east-west route to the SFBA and San Joaquin valley. After SP built the Palmdale cutoff in the 1960s, most traffic bypasses Los Angeles in favor of West Colton and points east.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Friday, July 24, 2015 5:26 PM

Seems to me like it is more a part of an east-west route than a north-south.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Why is Tehachapi so important today?
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 24, 2015 5:10 PM

Looking at the map of UP in California, there's a perfectly good line that runs from Oakland to LA along the coast.  The line through central California through the Tehachapi mountains is by all accounts tortorous in comparison to the route along the coast. So why was it built in the first place and why does it remain so important in this day and age?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy