Wizlish Of course, Majestic Legend is a Hong Kong company, in existence less than two years. And who controls Hong Kong now?
Of course, Majestic Legend is a Hong Kong company, in existence less than two years. And who controls Hong Kong now?
Financiers and bankers run HK, as always. It's much the same as Macau, both being provincial-level Special Administrative Districts of the PRC, with a lot of autonomy (their own passports, taxing bodies, etc.), but Macau is controlled by casino operators such as Sheldon Adelson.
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
CSR has had quality control problems in the past, including asbestos problems in locomotives for Australia and New Zealand that were certified as asbestos-free. If it is simply investment in a company fully building cars here to standards it is fine, but anything more may be suspect.
The industrial decline you describe has occured mainly in the NE US, as you outlined (I say mainly). In the Southern US, industrial growth has increased significantly and is quite robust at this time. There are numerous steel plants (electric mills, mainly) and auto plants. And some railcar plants.
Northtowne
I think you are right; it's not really 'controversial' in the sense that an attempt by Chinese business to import large numbers of Chinese-built tank cars would be. If I understand the situation correctly, Vertex essentially 'outsourced' much of the engineering and construction know-how "to a lowest bidder" and has further cut its development expenses by giving an equity stake (via JV) to the people providing the know-how (in this case, Chinese).
Whether the training of the 'Chinese checkers/inspectors' (sorry, I could not resist!) is inadequate, or whether inferior parts coated in lead-bearing primer will be sent over to make rickety tank cars, I can't say -- but intentional fudging on 1232 construction standards or whatever doesn't seem to be an implicit part of the Vertex business model.
I did note with some interest that the Vertex 'engineering' company has recently filed for bankruptcy. At the time I thought this was suspicious, but I now wonder if it's just similar to Apple getting rid of its entire advanced-products research lab when they first decided to become a consumer-products company...
I'll have a go at why this is "controversial" to some of us.
First, let's understand that controversial doesn't mean wrong, it simply means there is a debate or controversey about something. Second, as one who was born and raised in Cleveland, it offends my sensibilities that our steel mills and fabricating shops, to say nothing of all the ore boats, railroads, mines, etc. that steel requires, are thought to be uneconomical or unable to compete with China on contracts of this type. The fact that some company thinks it more in their interest to import all or part of such cars isn't wrong, necessarily; I understand where the company is coming from. However, it does offend me and therefore it's controversial, at least as far as I'm concerned.
I need not remind the rapidly-graying demographic that reads these forums that our manufacturing industries have significantly declined. When these unionized companies went out of business they took down with them the lifestyles that we rust-belters grew up with and now miss. Nothing similar has replaced them.
By itself, one company importing tank cars from China isn't much of a body blow to America any more. However, when I ride The Lake Shore Limited through upstate New York cities and towns, or when I ride through Pittsburgh or Johnstown or Youngstown and see where the mills used to be, and see the unpainted houses, etc.; when I look into my newspaper and read about our youth unemployment rate, the college loan mess many must get into in order to leave the those towns to thrive elsewhere in our now paperless service economy, then I do feel resentful when I read about tank cars from China.
Let's remember two things about China. Since 1948 they have not exactly been our friends; this shows no signs of changing. Second, China's workers are paid a bare fraction of what ours are today, even the non-unionized US workers. That's why they get this work and we don't.
Consequently, when I read about Chinese tank cars, yeah, to me it's controversial. Like so much else in my life, I can't change it. I can only go with the flow and adapt, like our companies are.
But that doesn't mean I have to like it.
Chinese checkers, anyone?
I'm ducking.
Johnny
Euclid Is this controversial? If so, why?
Is this controversial? If so, why?
Say Chinese in this country and anything becomes controversial.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Ah, Vertex Rail, a topic of some discussion last year on rr.net because their press release had stated they were going to manufacture tank cars and other rolling stock in North Carolina AND Massachusetts - in the event, manufacturing seems only planned for the North Carolina facility.I believe they were supposed to be up and running by the end of last quarter...oh well.
The Chinese are helping to fund a startup tank car manufacturer here in the U.S. Inretesting that U.S. employees are being sent to China for training if I read this correctly. Wonder what components are being sourced from China and that the Chineese won't make a full investment until the sample cars pass AAR approval.
http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/business/single-view/view/chinese-manufacturer-invests-in-us-wagon-venture.html
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.