Trains.com

A Locomotive Question

868 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 101 posts
Posted by ozzy01 on Wednesday, November 3, 2004 12:40 PM
Back around the 1980 time frame while living in Dayton,Ohio , Southern Rwy units showed up on CR pooled trains between Columbus,Oh-Chatanooga,Tn. From time to time an SP unit would appear. Chessie had an ocassional SR unit,but it was rare.
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Just outside Atlanta
  • 422 posts
Posted by jockellis on Wednesday, November 3, 2004 11:13 AM
I now see more Union Pacific diseasels in Atlanta, GA than I do of the railroads which actually have track here, Norfolk Southern and CSX. Twenty years ago, I nearly fainted when I saw a red Frisco EMD on the point of a SCL freight in Waycross, GA.
Jock Ellis

Jock Ellis Cumming, GA US of A Georgia Association of Railroad Passengers

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Wednesday, November 3, 2004 8:55 AM
Many of the GP39Ms were rebuilt from many different RR's GP30's and other older models and then leased to BNSF. But by far the most well known are the Paducah rebuilds.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, November 2, 2004 4:20 PM
At the end of the Steam Era, when some roads were phasing out steam faster than other roads it was not uncommon for those roads that were still using steam to buy engines from those railroads that were going all diesel.

The B&O purchased a number of engines from both the SAL and B&M when those railroads dieselized. The B&O also purchased a number of NYO&W FT diesels when that company ceased operations.

Today the Class I's utilize their power until there is virtually no economic life left in the engines. Then they are sold off in three ways, to leasing companies that may or may not upgrade and rebuild some of the better expamles available. To Short Lines or Regionals as for these companies buying and upgrading a worn out Class I's junk may be more economic than attempting to purchase new power from the builders. The absolutely total junk goes to the scrappers.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Tuesday, November 2, 2004 4:09 PM
1. Tree68, thanks for the answere. I have been getting confused on that stuff. Because now, Just about everytime I see a train, I see a re painted engine with a different company.
2. M.W.Hemphill, what I am trying to say is, in the years of 1960-1980, would some companies buy engines or rolling stock from another company. Like the Burlington Northern buying an engine from the Union Pacific.
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,018 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, November 2, 2004 2:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Glen Ellyn

Here is a seperate question that goes along with the first one. Did rail lines from 1960-1980 buy opponents engines or cars?

Since railroads have never manufactured their own diesels (at least not like some did with steam), and the practice of building your own cars has long passed, railroads haven't had to buy from "competitors" (if they ever did). IMHO, I don't think the Class 1's generally buy used equipment (ie from companies like Chrome Crankshaft), so that means they generally wouldn't be buying a competitors used equipment. Most RRs are going to run a car until it can't run.

Then you have to factor in leasing.....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Tuesday, November 2, 2004 2:27 PM
Here is a seperate question that goes along with the first one. Did rail lines from 1960-1980 buy opponents engines or cars?
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by CSXrules4eva on Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:34 PM
Well around my area Philly it isn't uncommon at all to see different locomotive lash ups. I also see lots of different RR's power on one's right of way. One time on the NEC I saw two UP AC6000s with a coal train. They were headed nothbound on the route Conrail normally takes. I thought that was weird. There are lots of leasing companys out there today. Sometimes on a good day I'll see CSX. NS, UP, HLCX, GCFX power. There isn't a day (when I go railfaning in the greater philadelphia region) that I won't see a leasing unit making up a consist. I think the mixing up of railroad power in loco consists is a pratice of many areas today.
LORD HELP US ALL TO BE ORIGINAL AND NOT CRISPY!!! please? Sarah J.M. Warner conductor CSX
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,315 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:20 PM
tracey
back in the day youd see the railroad with its own or predecessor roads.like nkp with N&W or a B&O WM or C&O with the chessie paint locos.but now they keep better track of the hours and get better use out of the power.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:17 PM
CN at that time? Yes. When I was younger, seeing consists of 4 to 5 SD40s with CN and sometimes the odd Conrail, or lease engine wasn't uncommon. I have even seen the exotic ones like Deleware Hudson, Chessie System and Northern Alberta Railways.
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:34 PM
Nowadays the railways share WAY more than ever before.

Here in British Columbia CN and CP share all kinds of trackage...

They have directional running in the fraser canyon and in the lower mainland they recently announced that they are now sharing a whole bunch of trackage in by the port of Vancouver....

Interesting enough, however, I have never seen CN power on a CP train or CP power on a CN train.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Saturday, October 30, 2004 8:51 PM
There was much less mixing of differently owned locomotives in the period you quote, possibly because the accounting was more difficult before modern computers were available.

But there were still many interesting lash-ups in the early Conrail era, when locomotives of the combined companies ran together in their original colours, along with some newly painted units in Conrail Blue. Reading units, in green and yellow, really stood out! Conrail also leased some CN MLW units at that time!

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
A Locomotive Question
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 30, 2004 8:31 PM
It is common today to see a lashup of different railroads motive power in a consist. Was this the case back in the 1960-1980? The train videos I have watched seem to show a solid consist of a particuler railroad. I also realize that there are a lot of lease companies today. Any feedback will be appreciated.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy