Trains.com

Speaking of fuel costs...

615 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Lakewood NY
  • 679 posts
Speaking of fuel costs...
Posted by tpatrick on Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:43 PM
I crunched some info recently gleaned from this forum and from Classic Trains Steam Glory. I came up with a comparison of fuel costs for a N&W 2-8-8-2 vs. an SD-70. Add some arbitrary assumptions and here are some numbers to consider:

Someone in a recent post suggested diesel fuel consumption to be about 4 gallons per mile. Current price of fuel is estimated at $1.75. At that rate the SD-70 would cost about $7.00 per mile, working full bore.

Classic Trains talks about coal consumption on the N&W steamer at 13.5 tons for 62.9 miles and a little higher for a steeper grade. Assuming a coal cost of $20 per ton, the Y6b costs $4.28 per mile, or $2.72 cheaper than the diesel.

Before we all rush out to fire up our boilers, there is the cost of water to think about. With nothing else to go on, I used the cost of my home water service (Jamestown NY municipal) and came up with $86.47 for the 21,000 gallons of water used by the Y6b. Divide that by 62.9 miles and we have a per mile water expense of $1.38. So the steamer still saves $1.34 per mile in direct operating cost.

It would take a lot of miles to overcome the other operating economies of the diesel, so I guess EMD and GE are safe for now. Anyhow, this was just a fun exercise and I am sure there are lots of ways you could poke holes in it. So have at it and build me up or tear me down.[:D]
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,352 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:06 PM
What's the cost of dealing with the ash and cinders from the run?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:12 PM
So much for the good ol' days of 19cents a gallon of gas.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:49 PM
I'm sure the EPA would love that [:p]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:10 AM
....can't forget about all the people that it takes to keep a fleet of steam loco's in operation.

[:D]

The REAL good old days. [:)]
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Sunday, October 24, 2004 5:22 AM
What about the fact it take two people to operate a steamer compared to the one for a deisel,, that's where the real cost is.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy