Trains.com

BNSF Spends 120M in Minnesota

1856 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2014
  • 135 posts
BNSF Spends 120M in Minnesota
Posted by cajonsummit on Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:03 AM

http://erstarnews.com/2014/08/16/bnsf-capital-investment-plan-in-progress/

Smile

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, August 19, 2014 5:07 PM

cajonsummit

 http://erstarnews.com/2014/08/16/bnsf-capital-investment-plan-in-progress/

Activated

Smile

Wonder how loud Wall Street would have screamed if BNSF was still a public corporation ? How would the $5.0 Billion in capital improvements being done this year been received ?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, August 19, 2014 7:42 PM

blue streak 1

cajonsummit

 http://erstarnews.com/2014/08/16/bnsf-capital-investment-plan-in-progress/

Activated

Smile

Wonder how loud Wall Street would have screamed if BNSF was still a public corporation ? How would the $5.0 Billion in capital improvements being done this year been received ?

Why are they wasting all that money that could be given to the shareholders?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:04 AM

Publicly held corporations (not just railroads) are all tending to shy away from making major capital expenditures of any sort even as they sit on large amounts of cash in the corporate treasury.  Some of this attitude may be long-term fallout from the leveraged-buyout mania of the 1980's and the current push by activist shareholders and investment funds to "unlock shareholder value" (empty the corporate treasury?).

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:26 PM

Back in the fifties, Trains had an article concerning the NP's re-equipping the North Coast Limited, with the comment "it takes money to make money." And, I think of the Children's Fund's desire to take control of CSX and then gut the road by not putting money into maintaining the property. I am always glad to see that the various roads are spending capital in improving the property--so they will be able to keep the trains moving and thus increase their income.   

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:28 PM

BaltACD
why are they wasting all that money that could be given to the shareholders?

BNSF reported earnings of less than $1B for quarter April - June.  Yet spending $5B for year.  Can you hear the shareholders if it still was public ?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:55 PM

BaltACD

blue streak 1

cajonsummit

 http://erstarnews.com/2014/08/16/bnsf-capital-investment-plan-in-progress/

Activated

Smile

Wonder how loud Wall Street would have screamed if BNSF was still a public corporation ? How would the $5.0 Billion in capital improvements being done this year been received ?

Why are they wasting all that money that could be given to the shareholders?

 Why aren't they spending all that money on graffiti abatement?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 591 posts
Posted by petitnj on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:08 PM

And the state of Minnesota spends $2B on roads that continue to deteriorate. There are undriveable state highways here and no one complains! 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Somewhere in North Texas
  • 1,080 posts
Posted by desertdog on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:36 PM

I'm not in favor of corporate raiders who gut companies or loot their treasuries, but from the tone of some of these posts, it's almost as if the shareholders deserved nothing for putting their money at risk. 

John Timm

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 455 posts
Posted by aricat on Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:13 PM

Warren Buffet has unlimited access to money and doesn't need stockholders to generate capital. He also doesn't have to worry about corporate raiders. Stockholders do expect a return on their investment. The question is whether BNSF is more efficient as a privately held corporation because it has more freedom of action. Also, are the shippers(customers) served better by a privately held corporation?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy