Trains.com

BNSF APPARENTLY, NOT TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS IN NORTH DAKOTA ?

1011 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:40 AM

Must have been that derailment in ND....  Tongue Tied

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:21 AM

Inbound traffic to the PTRA from both BNSF and UP has been down 25% for the last 5 weeks, they can’t get the trains to us because they have a big shortage of crews due to the HOS law…crews get on trains, but can’t get them as far as they normally could because of the weather, which has a lot of lanes plugged up.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,279 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:35 PM

Can't speak to BNSF problems, however the weather has wrecked the efficient operation of my carrier for the past month and a half...HOS trains chew up manpower quickly in multiple ways, throw in weather related switch and signal issues both on my carrier and connecting carriers and you end up with a real three dimensional puzzle to solve.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:16 PM

In a local (that is, N.D.-based) AP story I saw a couple of days ago, BNSF said oil, only 4 percent of traffic system-wide, is not the problem, even in N.D. The spokesman blamed the severe winter weather, which has hurt car supply and crewing over much of the system.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:05 PM

BNSF's side of the story would be simple:  'We ship the product that makes the most profit for us.'

There's also a question of whether the sugar producers requested delivery of rolling stock in a timely manner, or waited until the last minute.  BNSF may be locked into a low-profit contract that was negotiated long before the oil boom and believe they should be earning more for these shipments, and are, therefore, trying to force the sugar producers to turn to trucking.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
BNSF APPARENTLY, NOT TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS IN NORTH DAKOTA ?
Posted by samfp1943 on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:55 PM

An article from the Grand Forks Herald of Tuesday, Feburary 4,2014:: linked @

http://www.grandforksherald.com/content/rail-headaches-force-american-crystal-sugar-slow-production

"Rail headaches force American Crystal Sugar to slow production"

[

"HILLSBORO, N.D. — American Crystal Sugar Co. says it is slowing down sugar production at three of its five factories immediately because of slow rail service. Some agricultural industry officials feel they’re losing out to oil traffic...."

[snip] "...United Sugars Corp., American Crystal’s marketing entity with two other co-ops, has been behind in shipments to customers from this region by 150 to 200 cars at a time, well above the usual zero late deliveries. United Sugars is a joint venture between Crystal Sugar, Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative and U.S. Sugar Corp., a sugarcane co-op based in Clewiston, Fla.

Several hundred empty cars are sitting on tracks somewhere between United Sugars and its customers, Berg says. “This is completely out of bounds. We’re looking for 100 to 120 cars,” Berg says. “What do you do? Do you put the product on the ground? No.”

About three-fourths of Crystal’s 2.5 billion pounds of sugar goes out in trains, and a quarter by truck and in consumer packages. The company has increased its truck hauling as much as possible to offset the rail problem..." [snip]

With all the concentration on the Crude oil tank cars and their issues and problems, it seems that the "Other" shippers are apparently not being served to their satisfaction.  Lack of cars to ship their food and agricultural products, seems to be a major issue, followed by a potential lack of employees for BNSF ( and maybe other Rail Carries ?) in North Dakota.

     Having the Cars, Locomotives and employees to staff those locomotives and enough other employees to  switch, service, administer. and maintain the BNSF infrastructure... Is this going to be ( if not already) a real probem for BNSF.  My guess it is every company's desire to have too much business, but we all know these kinds of problems can really be problematic for a railroad, and potentially, the bottom line.   

  As a railfan it makes one wonder how this "story' will shake out... and what is the BNSF's side of the story?

 

 

 


 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy