Trains.com

C B & Q / Metra E Units For Sale

4153 views
29 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
C B & Q / Metra E Units For Sale
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 12:00 PM
I just noticed that four ex C B & Q / Metra E units for now listed for sale. Most every railfans likes/loves the old E units. This post is being made so you can see them. Hey if you have the $$$ you can even buy one. (I want a cab ride though [;)] ) Enjoy. [:D]


http://ozarkmountainrailcar.com/new_page_160.htm

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, October 11, 2004 12:22 PM
Jim - I am bustin' my buttons to get there, but no go, so far! Fix it for me!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 12:37 PM
Cool stuff. I want a caboose!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 1:05 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Jim - I am bustin' my buttons to get there, but no go, so far! Fix it for me!

Mookie


Moo, have a talk with your "buttons", I just clicked on the link and it worked. [;)]


Talbanese [:)]

They usually do have some cabooses for sale. I didn't check that out today though. [:p]
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, October 11, 2004 1:08 PM
I banged on mine and it goes nowhere! Maybe I am wound a little too tight - security-wise!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, October 11, 2004 1:11 PM
I even typed in the website! Probably too many people going to get there and buy it before I even get to see it!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Monday, October 11, 2004 1:17 PM
Christmas is coming in a couple of months[:p].(Hint-hint)[:D]
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 1:29 PM
E-units are great old machines, unfortunately with few long distance passenger trains or excursions needing these units there is almost nowhere to run them as their six axle (A1A?) trucks are prohibitive on many short lines...

Thus, if you were to get one it would likely rust quietly somewhere...sad, but true...

LC
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, October 11, 2004 1:40 PM
This is good news. Interesting to see who will buy.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 2:01 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

<snip>
Thus, if you were to get one it would likely rust quietly somewhere...sad, but true...


Yeah! One of those costs about the same as my house! I could set one along side it and really upstage the guy a couple of blocks over that has a caboose in his back yard!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 2:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Jim - I am bustin' my buttons to get there, but no go, so far! Fix it for me!

Mookie


Moo, have a talk with your "buttons", I just clicked on the link and it worked. [;)]


Talbanese [:)]

They usually do have some cabooses for sale. I didn't check that out today though. [:p]



I was dreaming.... My wife would kill me!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 2:10 PM
Trust me. I already have a locomotive. It is like having a boat but only getting to run it once or twice a year...

To keep it up and running I need to go through all sorts of very expensive procedures. A 92 day inspection (the rough equivalent of an oil and filter change for yor car) costs about $3,000. Luckily I can get some OOS time...

Oh, and don't forget the major air brake inspection and update that you must do every three years... (talk about $$$).

Forget about the initial cost of buying the locomotive, the carrying costs are brutal.

It is fun to think about, but even as a licensed locomotive engineer the time I can run it is minimal. I may lease it to a RR just to get out from under the carrying costs for a while...

LC
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, October 11, 2004 2:38 PM
Wow LimitedClear!

That's a hard dose of reality! I'm very fond of E units but one has to assume that these E units probably have mileage somewhere in the millions.

Would be wonderful if they were purchased and restored to original appearance.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 11, 2004 4:40 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

Wow LimitedClear!

That's a hard dose of reality! I'm very fond of E units but one has to assume that these E units probably have mileage somewhere in the millions.

Would be wonderful if they were purchased and restored to original appearance.


Antonio-

Feel free to call any of the mechanical folks who have restored or worked on the E units. There are a number that have been restored in various paint schemes (Erie and DL&W come to mind) but when you have locomotives this large with two prime movers and large solid trucks the maintenance costs are daunting. Some of the NRHS Chapters that have them are not operating them due to maintenance and operating costs.

That said, they are nice locomotives and I would like to see them preserved. Unfortunately, I can't afford a giant paperweight or I'd buy one myself...

LC
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:28 PM
This makes me want to go out and buy a ticket for the $60 million lottery, THEN I could buy one!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:47 PM
Start Up Commuter Railroad???
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:23 AM
I wonder though, just as on some tugboats isn't it possible for an E-Unit to run on a single 567 diesel?

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 14, 2004 11:43 AM
If I'm not mistaken, a number of six-axle EMD cab units were converted by (or built for?) various railroads with only one prime mover; the rear section was open for baggage and RPO.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:33 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by captainclack

If I'm not mistaken, a number of six-axle EMD cab units were converted by (or built for?) various railroads with only one prime mover; the rear section was open for baggage and RPO.


YOU ARE VERY CORRECT...I BELIEVE ROCK ISLAND HAD SOME "POCKET ROCKET" EA UNITS
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Thursday, October 14, 2004 1:32 PM
Hey Jim,

Just think of all the chicks you could pick up with one of those.

Might be able to beat me.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:00 PM
A lot more fun to pick up chicks with an RS-18u. We just tell them that the handbrake wheel on the fron is to steer the locomotive when we are backing up!! Most don't have any idea we are ribbing them until we let them in on the "secret" (its in the tracks, dummy...)

LOL...

LC

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:48 PM
I have been thinking-(DANGER DANGER). I have about a half-mile of ex-MILW MOW running through the farm. A few ties, some rail....

Only thing, I'd have to convert the engine into living quarters, because the other half sure wouldn't let me stay here!!!

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 2,741 posts
Posted by Paul Milenkovic on Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:09 PM
What was the deal with E units and commuter trains?

The E unit is 25 tons an axle times 6 axles with only 4 motored. The F unit is 30 tons an axle times 4 motored axles. While the F unit has less HP, the E unit has less starting tractive effort. While the E unit is somewhat heavier than the F unit, it has a lower axle loading -- you would think the E unit was meant for high-speed passenger service. I would also think with the frequent stops of commuter trains, the F unit would be better.

What was the thinking behind the two Diesels in one carbody? Isn't that a maintenance liability?

If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 15, 2004 8:39 AM
The Q started using E units out of the general passenger pool for commuter trains in the early 50s. They bought very few B-units and ran A-units on long distance trains elephant-style. E7s, 8s, and 9's were used on the commuters and when the double deck cars arrived, the trains always had seperate power cars usually built into old combines. When the E9's were eventually rebuilt by M&K they lost their steam generators and received HEP. After that the power cars were no longer used. There were other changes to the E's as well, so from a historical perspective, these aren't the most original.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Friday, October 15, 2004 8:51 AM
up829 brings up some very accurate points about the ex-Q E-8 and E-9 units running in commuter service between Chicago and my hometown of Aurora. Also of interest to me was the high level of utilization the Q (and later BN) got out of those factastic machines. They would come into town, say on a Monday afternoon, on a long distance intercity passenger train, then be used the next morning on the commuter rush and when that was over they would send the unit out again on an afternoon long distance outbound train, and the cycle continued adinfinitim. Those E units seemingly never sat around for more time than it took to service them and then out again.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, October 15, 2004 3:19 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by eolafan

up829 brings up some very accurate points about the ex-Q E-8 and E-9 units running in commuter service between Chicago and my hometown of Aurora. Also of interest to me was the high level of utilization the Q (and later BN) got out of those factastic machines. They would come into town, say on a Monday afternoon, on a long distance intercity passenger train, then be used the next morning on the commuter rush and when that was over they would send the unit out again on an afternoon long distance outbound train, and the cycle continued adinfinitim. Those E units seemingly never sat around for more time than it took to service them and then out again.


This, IMHO, is a testament to good old fashioned, rugged American quality....(of the past). Like an old Chevy, these units had a high availability rate. Of course one must consider that railroad shop forces were bigger back then too (so many technicians per locomotive batch) compared to the "skeleton shop crews" of today's railroads.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 17, 2005 2:23 PM
Reading the response from limitedclear leads me to my question. If one has a private car and/or locomotive (and license), how does on get on live rail? Can you contact the owner of the track and pay/get permission to run on it? All I read about is having Amtrak haul you around. How do you make your one or two runs a year?

Thanks!!
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, January 17, 2005 7:06 PM
Some of you might remember that the museum in Tennessee had to get rid of two beautiful E8s painted in the New York Central scheme. Cost was too high to maintain the units. I do wonder what's become of them.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Australia
  • 56 posts
Posted by GMS-AU on Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:56 AM
Could these E's be retrofitted with flexicoil or hi-ad trucks from a newer loco? Is the frame similar or would wiring present a problem as well? I am presuming this would not be worth the effort unless you were a real fan or a road wanting a specific loco to haul a train.

G M Simpson
There is no replacement for displacement!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:34 AM
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6737&item=4518838601&rd=1

1981 GM EMD F40 LocomotiveTrain

Item has ended for US $55,000.00 (mdubbs21 is the winner).

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy