Trains.com

How does a railroad know when to rebuild a locomotive?

7116 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 592 posts
How does a railroad know when to rebuild a locomotive?
Posted by 88gta350 on Saturday, September 11, 2004 5:27 PM
What is the criteria for when to rebuild an engine? Is it miles? Hours of service? Years/months in service? Or is there a set of performance criteria that the engine must maintain or be rebuilt (horsepower, torque, etc)?
Dave M
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • 655 posts
Posted by Mikeygaw on Saturday, September 11, 2004 5:55 PM
was a nice little topic while back... cant seem to find it though...

if i remember, the mileage was every 500,000, 1 million or 1.5 million miles with a max of 30 years... i think
Conrail Forever!
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Saturday, September 11, 2004 8:04 PM
after a wreck or when the rust starts to eat holes through the cab to the point that ductap wont keep the wind out of the cab....only then will the railroads even think about sending it to the shop for a complete rebuild..hahahahah
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, September 11, 2004 8:15 PM
When the railroads are too cheap to spend money on modern ones....hahahaha
Andrew
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Saturday, September 11, 2004 8:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

When the railroads are too cheap to spend money on modern ones....hahahaha
then they are too cheep to spend the money on new ones...or dont have the money to rebuild...they just get a LT&E loco or some other rebuilder...csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Saturday, September 11, 2004 10:30 PM
Most of the time a single locomotive isn't singled out to be rebuilt. It will be a class of locomotives that are otherwise worth while machines. A group of locomotives must still have utility. Most locomotive components have been changed out more than once already by the time a class rebuild is done. EMD recommends that major components :power assys, wheels, traction motors,air compressors,pumps,are changed out at regular intervals. I think I remember that EMD says the 645E3 needs to be changed out every 20 years.
Many times a class of locomotives is rebuilt to take advantage of new technology, stuff that wasn't available when the locomotive was built, like bolt on adhesion systems etc.
The improvements in performance adding this new tech gear makes rebuilding the machines very competative with buying a new locomotive.
Randy
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 11, 2004 11:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

after a wreck or when the rust starts to eat holes through the cab to the point that ductap wont keep the wind out of the cab....only then will the railroads even think about sending it to the shop for a complete rebuild..hahahahah
csx engineer


Yeah, but they still won't send it until it dies in line of road or some critical part falls clean off...

LC
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Sunday, September 12, 2004 2:54 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

after a wreck or when the rust starts to eat holes through the cab to the point that ductap wont keep the wind out of the cab....only then will the railroads even think about sending it to the shop for a complete rebuild..hahahahah
csx engineer


Yeah, but they still won't send it until it dies in line of road or some critical part falls clean off...

LC
thats where a hammer and ductape come in...
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, September 13, 2004 7:21 AM
What do you mean by "rebuilt"? Very few units are totally rebuilt but just about all do get their components overhauled during their lives.

Railroads will typically schedule components to be rebuild based on when inspections tell them the parts are worn out. For example, the RR will monitor the condition of the power assemblies and bearings on a given class in their fleet. They can see the wear rate by visual inspection, so they will be able to tell that that the power assemblies will need replacing in the 5th year. They'll build a budget and back shop program around these findings and then actually do the work as units fall out of service or they find worse than average units in the fleet. While the locomotive is getting new power assemblies, other overhaul work will usually be done (budget permitting!) to allow the locomotive to stay out of the backshop for another 5 years. For example, the trucks, main generator bearing and aircompressor may also be overhauled.

Sometimes traffic conditions or budget constraints will delay an overhaul program. And the RR will cross their fingers that most of the units will hang in there another year without sending power assembly parts thru too many turbos.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 592 posts
Posted by 88gta350 on Monday, September 13, 2004 8:36 AM
I was thinking of the engine itself, rather than the whole locomotive. Thinking of a locomotive as just a big car, systems will be replaced as they break/wear, or preventative maintance will be done to replce/servce parts before they fail, but at what point does the engine itself (block, pistons, etc) need rebuilt? How many miles does the typical locomotive run before the engine just can't go any longer, despite maintanance and repairs?
Dave M
  • Member since
    July 2001
  • From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by SSW9389 on Monday, September 13, 2004 10:46 AM
Do the railroads still use spectrographic analysis of oil samples to see what metals are showing up in the engine oil? I've read that this is used to tell when a locomotive is due for shop time.
COTTON BELT: Runs like a Blue Streak!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, September 13, 2004 6:45 PM
The last of the old State Government Railways, Queensland Rail, certainly did spectrographic analysis in the 1970s, as did most of the systems. Now the efficient private railways in Australia have lost or sold off the big workshops that had the scientific equipment (except Queensland).

However, the major work is contracted to the locomotive builders and I imagine they still use oil analysis along with the other diagnostic techniques to determine what work is needed.

Spectrum analysis did tell you what types of metal were in the oil - high copper meant bearing wear, other metals would indicate piston liner and ring damage.

Peter
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Monday, September 13, 2004 7:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SSW9389

Do the railroads still use spectrographic analysis of oil samples to see what metals are showing up in the engine oil? I've read that this is used to tell when a locomotive is due for shop time.
i dont know if csx uses spectrographic analysis..but they do have some kind system... they have bar code tags on the locomtives..and i have seen in some of the shop areas bottles that have a bar code that i guess matches the bar codes on the locomtives... im guessing for some kind of oil testing..
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 13, 2004 7:46 PM
When the connecting rods and pistons come out of either the cylinder heads or the base pan,followed by copious amounts of crankcase oil[;)], just like a car would[:-^]. LOL
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:52 AM
Spectrographic analysis of oil will tell you when you have a BIG accute problem, not generally when the engine is worn out. You do that by direct inspection. On an EMD you can see the rings directly thru the liner ports and they a have grooves on them to judge the wear. On a GE, you can stick a boroscope down the fuel nozzle hole and get a look at the liner walls.

Oil analysis mostly tells you when to change the oil and it you have a water leak some where. Both extremely valuable pieces of information.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy