QUOTE: Originally posted by Overmod There's a very good modern product that uses sticks of solid 'lubricant' in special magazines, mounted on the locomotive trucks and bearing very precisely on the part of the rail requiring lubrication. They were mentioned in a recent information post right here on trains.com. I couldn't see any particular problem with 'greasers' as described above that these things don't solve...
TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken On some railroads, you are less likely to see a flange lubricator because the grease/lubricant is applied either by the locomotive and/or a hi-rail truck by the local track supervisors. The idea is to lubricate the gage side of the ball of rail and not the top of rail. If too much lubricant is applied to the rail, then it migrates up and over to the top of rail causing wheel slip. Maintenance folks are out there with "Goop Gauges" (real term) and tribometers trying to get the optimum amount of grease into play. The operating folks can whine all they want, but rail and wheel wear is every bit as critical. Randy Stahl and I might butt heads over maintenance of locomotive mounted lubricators, but a properly set up and managed locomotive flange lubricator would curtail the use of the wayside units and extend wheel and rail life. (ATSF GP-60's had them, there were cases of self induced wheel slip with the locomotives putting down grease in the wrong places....frequently the grease containers on the locos were found to be bone dry and had been that way for a while) The old pump and plunger units had toubles with the new soy type lubricants and the new soy lubricants have troubles getting grease of the proper viscosity in cold weather out to the blades that apply grease to the rail. (That grease can carry over half a mile down the track if properly applied, a thin film is all that is needed)...The electric units do a good job (not perfect yet) of getting the grease out to the paddles/blades and saving some rail life. http://www.rtands.com/feb01/lubrication.html If you want to see a roadmaster, track supervisor or division engineer go ballistic, go out walking curves and find lots of shiny metal specks coating the base of rail[:(!][:(!][:(!]
QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill Paul: The principal purpose of a greaser is to reduce rail and wheel wear in sharp curves. The engineering department decides where to put them based on curvature, access to them, type of greaser, type of grease, etc. Usually you see them just in advance of a curve, or often in the tangent between two reverse curves. The operating department really doesn't like greasers very much if they're on steep grades, as they reduce adhesion and they end up not being able to haul as much tonnage as they think they should for a given horsepower. If the greaser is turned up too high (puts out too much grease), the locomotives can go into a wheel slip as they cross the greaser, and the power surge breaks the train in two. The operating and engineering department spend a lot of time arguing about the relative costs, because the rail is paid for by engineering and the horsepower by operating. To get beyond these generalities gets into technical discussion that's far beyond my expertise. I've seen articles that discuss the engineering aspects of greasers and predict the rail wear for a given curve radius, a given grease, a given type of rail, a given tonnage, etc., etc., and the formula are way beyond me. Suffice it to say that with greasers as with everything in railroading it's a tradeoff, and what solves one problem often creates six more.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.