Trains.com

Train Collision in Indiana.

2510 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Red Lodge, MT
  • 893 posts
Posted by sfcouple on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:45 PM

edblysard

Then maybe you should get in the habit of either getting your clairvoyant hat tuned up on a regular basis, or try popping in here once a week or so to see the topics under discussion, as a lot of what is here can relate back to the model world.

Lots of prototype information is right here at your fingertips, and lots of railroaders will happily answer your questions on how, what and why goes on at the real railroads.

Just a suggestion....Wink

 

 sfcouple:

 

I posted this story on the Model Railroad forum shortly after receiving a breaking news report via email.  My thread was subsequently moved to Trains by a moderator at Model Railroader.  Since I wasn't wearing my clairvoyant hat when the item was originally posted at Model Railroader, I wasn't aware of another posting on the Train forum.  Sigh

Wayne  

 

 

 

Thanks for the suggestion, and I do pop in once in a while but usually don't post.  On the day in question, which seems to have generated a lot of interest, I was somewhat occupied and just did a quick posting on the Model Railroad form that I thought might be of general interest over there.  Quite frankly, it didn't occur to me to check on the Trains Forum which is something I should have done---and I never ever thought that my posting would get transferred to Trains.  

You are correct that there is a lot of valuable information on Trains and I do enjoy visiting this site to read the opinion of railroad professionals.  Although I got my hands dirty in another profession, you guys generate a lot of respect from me and I always enjoy the comments on Trains.  I have learned a lot !  

I certainly didn't intend to cause any controversy with my posting, and in the future I will leave stories like this to the pros and just assume you guys have the bases covered.    So I'll close with something I tell my leo son: "be careful out there."

Wayne 

Modeling HO Freelance Logging Railroad.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:12 PM

Then maybe you should get in the habit of either getting your clairvoyant hat tuned up on a regular basis, or try popping in here once a week or so to see the topics under discussion, as a lot of what is here can relate back to the model world.

Lots of prototype information is right here at your fingertips, and lots of railroaders will happily answer your questions on how, what and why goes on at the real railroads.

Just a suggestion....Wink

sfcouple

I posted this story on the Model Railroad forum shortly after receiving a breaking news report via email.  My thread was subsequently moved to Trains by a moderator at Model Railroader.  Since I wasn't wearing my clairvoyant hat when the item was originally posted at Model Railroader, I wasn't aware of another posting on the Train forum.  Sigh

Wayne  

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 2:35 PM

"+1"  Thumbs Up

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:12 PM

The model RR area of the forum and the real RR area of the form are for practical purposes worlds apart and should be handled as their own worlds.  If there are multiple threads on the same subject in one world, I have no problem consolidating them, however, consolidating threads across the borders of a forum just confuses the issue beyond all recognition.  If the mod's think there is a legitimate reason for users to view the thread in the 'other' forum - write a post with the link to the illuminating thread.

tree68

 samfp1943:

 BaltACD:

A more appropriate 'fix' for this thread would have been to leave it in it's Model Railroad forum and provide the link to the real railroad forum thread..."

 

EXCELENT Suggestion!Thumbs UpThumbs Up

Thanks, BaltACD!

 

A common practice on a local forum I help moderate is to merge multiple threads on the same topic into one thread.  Last time I looked, there were three threads on this forum alone about this incident.  If that's possible with this forum software, it deserves consideration.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:19 AM

samfp1943

 BaltACD:

A more appropriate 'fix' for this thread would have been to leave it in it's Model Railroad forum and provide the link to the real railroad forum thread..."

 

EXCELENT Suggestion!Thumbs UpThumbs Up

Thanks, BaltACD!

A common practice on a local forum I help moderate is to merge multiple threads on the same topic into one thread.  Last time I looked, there were three threads on this forum alone about this incident.  If that's possible with this forum software, it deserves consideration.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Tuesday, January 10, 2012 7:25 AM

BaltACD

Mods -

While you may think you are doing the forum a favor by moving threads from one area of the forum to another  - all you are really doing in moving the topic from the forum in which it was created is to remove it from the audience for which it was intended by the original poster.

"...For  the most part the Model Railroaders stick to their forums - the 1:1 Scale railroaders stick to theirs.  Moving threads creates unneeded confusion for both category of forum citizens.

A more appropriate 'fix' for this thread would have been to leave it in it's Model Railroad forum and provide the link to the real railroad forum thread..."

EXCELENT Suggestion!Thumbs UpThumbs Up

Thanks, BaltACD!

 

 


 

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Red Lodge, MT
  • 893 posts
Posted by sfcouple on Monday, January 9, 2012 11:28 PM

BaltACD,

Thank you for a nice concise solution/explanation to the issue at hand.   

Wayne 

Modeling HO Freelance Logging Railroad.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, January 9, 2012 11:03 PM

Mods -

While you may think you are doing the forum a favor by moving threads from one area of the forum to another  - all you are really doing in moving the topic from the forum in which it was created is to remove it from the audience for which it was intended by the original poster.

For  the most part the Model Railroaders stick to their forums - the 1:1 Scale railroaders stick to theirs.  Moving threads creates unneeded confusion for both category of forum citizens.

A more appropriate 'fix' for this thread would have been to leave it in it's Model Railroad forum and provide the link to the real railroad forum thread.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Red Lodge, MT
  • 893 posts
Posted by sfcouple on Monday, January 9, 2012 10:37 PM

I posted this story on the Model Railroad forum shortly after receiving a breaking news report via email.  My thread was subsequently moved to Trains by a moderator at Model Railroader.  Since I wasn't wearing my clairvoyant hat when the item was originally posted at Model Railroader, I wasn't aware of another posting on the Train forum.  Sigh

Wayne  

Modeling HO Freelance Logging Railroad.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, January 9, 2012 10:01 PM

CShaveRR

Hate to be blunt here, but there is a very good thread giving the most precise information currently possible on this incident.  It was on CSX, near Valparaiso, Indiana, in two-track CTC territory.

SoapBox

PLEASE SEE the following link to the Thread that Carl (CShaveRR) mentions.

http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/p/201205/2199941.aspx#2199941

"Possible big derailment on CSX"

It is sort of counter productive to have two separate  Threads on the same topic, not to mention a lot of information gets lost between the two.

Suggestion:  Always best to check for a preexisting THread  before starting a new Thread.CryingCrying

The Thread mentioned was started very shortly after the accident occurred and has lots of information as to the location and what happened. 

MP173 replied on 01-07-2012 11:27 AM   [Thread Started]

Not to mention a dozen photos of the scene on TRAINS Newswire of this date: 01/09/12My 2 CentsBang Head

 

 


 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, January 7, 2012 8:03 AM

Hate to be blunt here, but there is a very good thread giving the most precise information currently possible on this incident.  It was on CSX, near Valparaiso, Indiana, in two-track CTC territory.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Shawnigan Lake, BC
  • 406 posts
Posted by rogertra on Friday, January 6, 2012 10:57 PM

Did this happen in single or double track territory?

Were exactly did this happen?  CNN is vague.

A Google Earth reference would be handy.

 

 

Cheers

Roger T.

Home of the late Great Eastern Railway see: - http://www.greateasternrailway.com

For more photos of the late GER see: - http://s94.photobucket.com/albums/l99/rogertra/Great_Eastern/

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, January 6, 2012 10:47 PM

 I can;t help but think this might never have happened had there still been a caboose on the first train - there would have been crew at the rear of the first stopped train to immediately provide flag protection and possibly prevent the second train from rear-ending it. ANd with no debris on the adjacent track, the third train would have been fine.

               --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, January 6, 2012 6:19 PM

Motley

OMG! Three trains collided, wow! That's gotta be a rare kind of accident. Glad nobody was lost.

Not that rare.  There are specific rules in place regarding train crews protecting adjacent tracks when the train goes in emergency.  I know of one instance that nearly involved 4 trains.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Central Vermont
  • 4,565 posts
Posted by cowman on Friday, January 6, 2012 5:53 PM

Sounds like a royal mess even without Hazmat.  Hope there wasn't any, a whole lot easier to clean up.


That is something that sounds like a model rr problem than the real thing.

Good that no one was seriously hurt.

Richard

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, January 6, 2012 4:39 PM

OMG! Three trains collided, wow! That's gotta be a rare kind of accident. Glad nobody was lost.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Red Lodge, MT
  • 893 posts
Train Collision in Indiana.
Posted by sfcouple on Friday, January 6, 2012 4:19 PM

Sounds as if there was a major train collision involving three separate trains in Indiana.  Fortunately no lives were lost but some were taken to local hospitals:

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-fire-chemical-spill-after-trains-collide-in-nw-indiana-20120106,0,3134190.story

Modeling HO Freelance Logging Railroad.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy