Trains.com

Yet another (almost tragic) Amtrak/truck accident!

2956 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:50 AM

Wouldn't have affected "your" Amtrak trains, Joe--this is on the line from Chicago to St. Louis, and happened southwest of Joliet.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,323 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:05 AM

did this delay the amtrak trains?? I think I saw an eastbound amtrak this morning at work in Archbold ohio.I saw passenger cars but couldn't tell if it was Amtrak or NS because of a coal train blocking the view.

stay safe

Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 4:18 AM

CShaveRR

(Snip)  Something about the phrasing, though, suggests that it was inevitable that the truck on the track was going to be hit by an Amtrak train "a few minutes later".  Almost makes you wonder if anyone attempted top contact UP and report the incident to them.  It may have been avoidable.

It would be very interesting to know exactly when the state trooper reported to his dispatcher that the truck was on the track and when Amtrak arrived.   That information is available, but somehow I have doubts we'll ever have it!

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, January 24, 2011 9:08 PM

I, too, think that the writer presented all of the facts (s)he was told; would welcome additional information.  It would be interesting to know how the second truck (presumably going straight on 53, which parallels the tracks) wound up on the tracks.  Something about the phrasing, though, suggests that it was inevitable that the truck on the track was going to be hit by an Amtrak train "a few minutes later".  Almost makes you wonder if anyone attempted top contact UP and report the incident to them.  It may have been avoidable.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 673 posts
Posted by Sawtooth500 on Monday, January 24, 2011 9:05 PM

The fact is that people won't learn to go around gates. It's also a fact that people have been getting hit by all forms of transportation ever since someone figured out to hook up a horse to a cart. We have plenty of education on RR crossing safety, and people know about it. The problem isn't whether people know or don't know, the problem is that people know and make the decision to do it anyway. That being the case, they bear personal responsibility over what happens. I don't go around gates, and I can say that as a result I peacefully sleep at night knowing that I will not be hit by a train at a grade crossing. But hey, you want to beat that train? Go right ahead. Your death will not cause me to lose sleep at night. 

It may seem cruel, but those are just the facts. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, January 24, 2011 8:51 PM

RABEL

Yet another  Media story lacking the facts concerning what actually took place.

What makes you say that?  It appears to be reporting what the State Police officer said.  Are you aware of an error or serious omission?  If so, what is it?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: On Track LaGrange IL.
  • 171 posts
Posted by RABEL on Monday, January 24, 2011 7:41 PM

Yet another  Media story lacking the facts concerning what actually took place.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:33 PM

Explosive Rd.?  How ironic.   Looks like they were carrying gravel or excavation dirt.  Some of those guys drive well over the speed limits, run lights and tail gate.  Not surprising one rear-ended the other leading to the rail accident.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Yet another (almost tragic) Amtrak/truck accident!
Posted by eolafan on Monday, January 24, 2011 5:17 PM

Yet another (almost tragic) Amtrak/truck collision here in metro Chicago today.  When will truck and car drivers ever learn about the dangers of foolish driving around active train tracks, like this one that carries high speed Amtrak trains to and from St. Louis:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chibrknews-will-county-elwood--amtrak-01242011,0,4133185.story?track=rss

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy