Trains.com

Pusher diesel engine on August Trains Cover...

960 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, July 8, 2004 2:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by erikthered

I'm wondering if the grades on Horseshoe Curve and the high power engines used there caused some of the operational problems I hear about nowadays- busted coupler knuckles, runaways, and derailments. The maps seem to have towers every fifteen feet or so and I bet the operators were busy checking trains for the above... were there any speed limits on the curve?

Erik


Broken knuckles and runaways have been with the railroad since the invention of the Janney coupler and the occurence of downgrades. As the railroads master getting each size train accross their specific territories they begin increasing train size to the point the begin having consistant trouble then work on the causes of the trouble.

Over the years they have developed high-strength knuckles, extended range dynamic braking, mid train remote controlled helpers and various other levels of technology.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, July 8, 2004 9:21 AM
...I can't give any numbers on freight train restrictions for the decent of the east downgrade and down around the Curve but I know they do exist. I remember traveling down through the curve some years ago [on a passenger train], and I heard the contuctor say we were under a 35 mph limit down through that area. Years ago there used to be "horns' near the summit and trains that started down too fast and through a measured space the warning horns would sound for the engineer to get his train under control before it went any farther....It is a critical area.

Quentin

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, July 8, 2004 7:56 AM
The LT2500 model was unique to PRR and was Lima's last locomotive production. The only comparable model was Baldwin's various centercabs.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 8, 2004 7:51 AM
I'm wondering if the grades on Horseshoe Curve and the high power engines used there caused some of the operational problems I hear about nowadays- busted coupler knuckles, runaways, and derailments. The maps seem to have towers every fifteen feet or so and I bet the operators were busy checking trains for the above... were there any speed limits on the curve?

Erik
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 10:14 PM
...Interesting...I would think the ones with the dynamic braking may have been used on the downgrade with the heavier trains...such as coal drags. With the high horsepower figure on the Centipedes, they must of had 2 engines per unit too. Believe they are shown in one of the current pic's of the Horseshoe Curve article.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 10:01 PM
PRR got two orders of these locomotives from Lima. The other order had dynamic brakes, which added large boxy housings next to the cab (on both hoods).

2500 horsepower may have been a lot in those days, but PRR also had the Baldwin Centipedes by around this time (1950-51)...3000 horsepower, and usually used in pairs.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 8:55 PM
....Did a little checking on the above mentioned engine...It for sure is a lima T-2500 engine containing 2 inline engines with a total of 2500 hp. I was wrong in my above mention of a 4-axle unit as it has 3-axle trucks each end. Found a full screen photo of it and details are shown very clearly. The picture I found was taken in Indianapolis and as it turns out not more than 65 miles from me....but of course back around 1965. That sounds like a rather powerful engine for that era. Must have been a pretty good unit for pusher duty up from Altoona, around the Curve and on to Cresson, Pa. One item I notice it is missing is dynamic braking...At least I don't see any cooling fans in the top where they are normally located on most units.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 6:54 PM
Yeah it's a LIMA, that's about all I got on it. LOL!!!

Pump

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 4:09 PM
Lima T-2500 transfer loco?
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Pusher diesel engine on August Trains Cover...
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 3:48 PM
....Could someone elaborate what the Diesel pusher engine number 5681 is rounding the Curve west bound on August cover....I may have known it's identity in the past but if so I have forgotten.
Center cab and appears to have 2 engines [prime movers], 4-axle and non roller bearing trucks.

Quentin

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy