Trains.com

DM&E

1835 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 5, 2004 11:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dblstack

I think KCS is highly consumed with their efforts to expand South (TFM). I wonder if they'd really have the resources to tackle this too.


Perhaps not at the moment, but DM&E is not exactly at the PRB yet. By the time DM&E can expand and complete it's western extension, the TFM deal should be wrapped up one way or the other. Assuming KCS wins TFM it will be a much larger more creditworthy company potentially capable of expansion.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 5, 2004 10:56 PM
I think KCS is highly consumed with their efforts to expand South (TFM). I wonder if they'd really have the resources to tackle this too.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 117 posts
Posted by cstaats on Monday, July 5, 2004 1:00 AM
The KCS would be interesting do they have connection with coal burning electric plants? I would assume the NS or CSX would be a possibility because of the eastern coal fire electric plants they service. Could the KCS bring the low Sulfur coal to tide water for export over seas? BNSF or UP with there Pacific ports would be at a better position to export coal to Asia. I was looking at the map of eastern coal fired electric plants. With the need for cleaner coal you would think it would be a no brainier for an eastern road to gobble up the DM&E. Any thoughts?
Chris
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 4, 2004 11:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by fuzzybroken

QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

QUOTE: Originally posted by cstaats

Should the DM&E reach the PRB would they be an attractive take over target for a Eastern or Canadian Road?


It is a distinct possibility.

LC

Takeover by an eastern road is a good possibility. Canadian not so much, since all of IC&E is former Canadian Pacific, but who knows? I think that a KCS-ICE-DME merger would make good sense, since it's basically end-to-end and an expansion of KCS to the north.

[2c],
-Mark
http://www.geocities.com/fuzzybroken



It is well known in the industry that KCS was looking at the IMRL as a potential acquisition, but lost out in the bidding to the Washington Group. At the time both the Gateway and IMRL were considered highly desirable by the KCS.

LC
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Sunday, July 4, 2004 10:39 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

QUOTE: Originally posted by cstaats

Should the DM&E reach the PRB would they be an attractive take over target for a Eastern or Canadian Road?


It is a distinct possibility.

LC

Takeover by an eastern road is a good possibility. Canadian not so much, since all of IC&E is former Canadian Pacific, but who knows? I think that a KCS-ICE-DME merger would make good sense, since it's basically end-to-end and an expansion of KCS to the north.

[2c],
-Mark
http://www.geocities.com/fuzzybroken
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 4, 2004 9:59 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cstaats

Will the PRB project generate enough revenue to pay back the $2B capital project?


Interesting question. Given the current high demand for coal from China and other parts of the far east it would seem likely. Of course, I haven't done the math. I think that some of the issues that the DM&E expansion still has to get through securing ROW and getting through the court battles will ultimately be resolved and financing will become more available, especially if the trend towards construction of more coal fired power plants continues.

LC
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 117 posts
Posted by cstaats on Saturday, July 3, 2004 10:22 PM
Will the PRB project generate enough revenue to pay back the $2B capital project?
Chris
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 3, 2004 7:35 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cstaats

Should the DM&E reach the PRB would they be an attractive take over target for a Eastern or Canadian Road?


It is a distinct possibility.

LC
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 117 posts
Posted by cstaats on Saturday, July 3, 2004 7:30 PM
Should the DM&E reach the PRB would they be an attractive take over target for a Eastern or Canadian Road?
Chris
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Friday, July 2, 2004 8:45 PM
DME and ICE are both owned by a holding company and they operate them jointly from Sioux Falls, SD. Cedar American Holdings, I think.
Eric
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 2, 2004 5:36 PM
Geez, I always have read the DM&E renamed itself.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 2, 2004 5:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Ringer1

The DM&E will never reach a profitable status without huge GRANTS not LOANS and run as a non-union scab-sucking Republican scam of free enterpise.

The PRB coal will not be the answer. If anybody thinks the BNSF & UP will give up the coal traffic without a fight they have to be in the mindset of *** Chenney and Honorable George of the weapons of mass sestruction.


Tom
GOD BLESS THE GREAT NORTHERN


I doubt DM&E reaching the PRB has anything to do with the Republican or Democratic parties. I'd rather leave the politics where they belong...on the political sites...

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 2, 2004 5:06 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dougal

The DM&E is a fallen flag, it bought I&M Rail Link to form the Iowa Chicago & Eastern Railroad.


Dougal. DM&E is very much alive. IC&E is a subsidiary as mentioned above.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 2, 2004 3:57 PM
The DM&E will never reach a profitable status without huge GRANTS not LOANS and run as a non-union scab-sucking Republican scam of free enterpise.

The PRB coal will not be the answer. If anybody thinks the BNSF & UP will give up the coal traffic without a fight they have to be in the mindset of *** Chenney and Honorable George of the weapons of mass sestruction.


Tom
GOD BLESS THE GREAT NORTHERN
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 117 posts
Posted by cstaats on Friday, July 2, 2004 3:51 PM
That is my my understanding too.
Chris
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: St. Louis Area, Florrisant to be specific!!!!!!!!!
  • 1,134 posts
Posted by bnsfkline on Friday, July 2, 2004 10:48 AM
Since when did DM&E merge into IC&E...I thought ICE was a subsidary
Jim Tiroch RIP Saveria DiBlasi - My First True Love and a Great Railfanning Companion Saveria Danielle DiBlasi Feb 5th, 1986 - Nov 4th, 2008 Check em out! My photos that is: http://bnsfkline.rrpicturearchives.net and ALS2001 Productions http://www.youtube.com/ALS2001
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 2, 2004 8:52 AM
The DM&E is a fallen flag, it bought I&M Rail Link to form the Iowa Chicago & Eastern Railroad.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 117 posts
DM&E
Posted by cstaats on Friday, July 2, 2004 12:02 AM
Will the DM&E ever be profitable? The dream of creating a new Class I gives us a look at the early days of railroads with bankrupt and insolvency. They could be a good target if they are able to reach the P.R.B. My question to the group is if they do reach the P.R.B. Would one of the Eastern or Canadian Roads have an interest in acquiring the property?
Chris

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy