Trains.com

Pennsy Question

924 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,015 posts
Posted by RudyRockvilleMD on Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:55 PM
The electrification to Harrisburg was completed in 1938, and as some have suggested the lack of funds stopped any further extensions. There was talk of extending the electrification to Pittsburgh to replace steam uo to and after WW-II, but with the advent of diesels electrification was thought not to be necessary.

Having ridden the Pennsy many times between Washington and New York I can attest to the ability of one GG 1 to handle a heavy train. I rarely saw more than one GG 1 on a passenger train unless it had more than 18 cars. The Congressional Limited in the 1950's had 18 cars, and one GG 1 could handle the train, and still make the 3 hr 35 minute schedule.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:48 AM
Pennsy had the intention to electrify to Pittsburgh. But the country had the small black Friday in 1929 which dried up the funds. The great depression did in the plans to electrify to Pittsburgh.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 8:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....Dave: Riding in the car as I remember it there was no noise detectable from the GG-1.....The main input from it to me...was how it pushed you back in the seat as it started to move the train....Riding east to get to Harrisburg the train would have been pulled by K4's and there was a difference from it compared to when the GG-1 was connected at Harrisburg to continue the trip to NYC....


Thanks modelcar, [:)][;)] electrics seem to really have good acceleration...our EMU's also seem to give us a little push...[:0]

Dave
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 8:13 PM
....Dave: Riding in the car as I remember it there was no noise detectable from the GG-1.....The main input from it to me...was how it pushed you back in the seat as it started to move the train....Riding east to get to Harrisburg the train would have been pulled by K4's and there was a difference from it compared to when the GG-1 was connected at Harrisburg to continue the trip to NYC....

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 5:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....I suspect the bigest reason the electrification was stopped at Harrisburg was the fact it was constructed during the depression years and there was only so much money available to do such projects. I'm amazed they did that much during those times.
Riding behind a GG-1 was a pleasant experience.....When it started the train it felt like it meant business and then it would bring it up to speed...90 or so and really move it out...Smoothly.


At the risk of sliding off topic, [:I] modelcar, how loud were those GG1s? I guess the coaches were reasonably insulated for noise? [;)]

Dave
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 4:05 PM
....I suspect the bigest reason the electrification was stopped at Harrisburg was the fact it was constructed during the depression years and there was only so much money available to do such projects. I'm amazed they did that much during those times.
Riding behind a GG-1 was a pleasant experience.....When it started the train it felt like it meant business and then it would bring it up to speed...90 or so and really move it out...Smoothly.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 3:54 PM
they stopped in harrisburg i believe because harrisburg is pennsylvania's capital and a large city. They ran more trains to harrisburg than what they did past Harrisburg to Pitsburgh and chicago. They electrified the most traveled areas.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Monday, May 31, 2004 9:51 AM
Money was the reason.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Monday, May 31, 2004 8:42 AM
@440cuin.

thank you for your quick reply.

martin
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 964 posts
Posted by TH&B on Sunday, May 30, 2004 5:18 PM
1) There is lots of books about this subject. The mountain section to Pittsburgh was never electrified, it was planned to but never materialized. True the electrics would have performed better than steam and for the passenger trains better than diesel.

2) If you mean m.u. as in multiply with other engines then yes GG1's could m u but only with other GG1's, not with any of the other types of units. 3 or 4 GG1's could be seen on freight trains, up to two on heavy mail trains.
GG1's could haul a heavy train pretty good but if it got stopped at a signal on a grade with a very heavy freight train they couldn't get started so the Pennsy had pusher engines for starting electric freights, here the diesel electrics could start up a heavy freight better then the GG1, but for hi speed heavy passenger trains or lighter fast freights the big G's could out do diesels easily.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 400 posts
Pennsy Question
Posted by martin.knoepfel on Sunday, May 30, 2004 4:45 PM
1. to me, it seems strange that electric catenary on the former pennsy-line ends at Harrisburg. thus, on the mountain-section to Pittsburgh, electric traction would have had greater advantages over steam or diesel traction than in the flat country. does anyone know. Has the mountain-section to Pittsburgh (and the Horse Shoe Curve) never been electrified, or did the Pennsy or Conrail decide to de-electrify the line?

2. does anyone know: have the GG1 been equipped with mu.?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy