Trains.com

Union Pacific road switchers, any of them of the Alco RS series?

2262 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Union Pacific road switchers, any of them of the Alco RS series?
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 4:57 PM
Calling UP fans and gurus...

I haven't been able to track down what UP used for road switchers (past and present) and I was wondering if they used the Alco RS series? [:)]

Kozzie
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 5:26 PM
Yep - RS-1's and RS-3's, plus the Bamberger Railroad stuff they assumed in Idaho.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 5:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

Yep - RS-1's and RS-3's, plus the Bamberger Railroad stuff they assumed in Idaho.


Thnaks Mudchicken. [;)] [:D]

I recently attended our annual miniature train show here in Brisbane, and I had picked up those Rivarossi 60 ft coaches in UP livery.

Apparently they were used for the shorter services...and was wondering if an RS-3 in front of those would have been prototypical for UP...??
(On a previous thread, a few of the Forum Folk mentioned that the RS series did pull a few freight cars with passenger cars behind - Thankfully there aren't too many foaming rivet counters around to bail me up heh heh)

What do you reckon? [;)]

Dave
(Kozzie)
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 6:24 PM
Dave,

There's a photo of an early Alco road switcher in UP colours in Louis Marre's "The First Fifty Years" and "The Second Diesel Spotters Guide". I can't remember which type it was, but it may have been an RSD-4. In fact the two books have nearly identical photos of different locomotives. One has a taller stack than the other.

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 6:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C

Dave,

There's a photo of an early Alco road switcher in UP colours in Louis Marre's "The First Fifty Years" and "The Second Diesel Spotters Guide". I can't remember which type it was, but it may have been an RSD-4. In fact the two books have nearly identical photos of different locomotives. One has a taller stack than the other.

Peter


Thanks Peter [;)]

You know how I have this Queensland thing about liking mixed trains....so...heh heh....
Those photos you mention of UP switchers...does it show any cars behind or just light engine?

Dave
(Kozzie)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 7:46 PM
Do it, Kozzie. You know you're going to, anyway![:-,]
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 8:01 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by drephpe

Do it, Kozzie. You know you're going to, anyway![:-,]


Hey drephpe [:D] I've already done it! [:D][:D]

I was running the four Rivarossi 60 foot UP coaches behind a couple of boxcars and a UP Consolidation at our annual miniature train exhibition last weekend, and the crowd really liked it! [:)][:)]
Didn't get any snarls from the rivet counters - but I would have just ignored them anyway heh heh.

Dave
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 8:13 PM
See. I told you so. Next time hang one or two of them cabeese in there and tell the rivet counters they're dome cars specially built for mixed train service. A real crowd pleaser. Domeliner City of Portacan.[bow][bow][bow]

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 8:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by drephpe

See. I told you so. Next time hang one or two of them cabeese in there and tell the rivet counters they're dome cars specially built for mixed train service. A real crowd pleaser. Domeliner City of Portacan.[bow][bow][bow]




drephpe [:0] I have a confession to make...[:0][:0]
I couldn't see any RS-3s in UP livery at the trader's stands at the show to pull the 60 foot UP coaches. I only had one in Seaboard Coast LIne livery and one in Cotton Belt livery. hmmmm...they looked good...what the heck...ran 'em anyway. [:0]...crowd loved it...and no rivet counters in sight [:D] hee hee

Dave
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 8:58 PM
so it was a TRULY mixed train (hee hee)
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, May 4, 2004 9:59 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by drephpe

so it was a TRULY mixed train (hee hee)


Aaaahhhhh! [^] A kindred spirit! [:p] [^] Long live Cabeese! [:-,][(-D][(-D][swg]

hey drephpe - any chance you cloud drop down under to me your email add? Mine is on my profile if you want to drop a line...

Dave
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 12:39 AM
In the western US, mixed trains on branchlines was horribly common, well into the 1960's.....Whatever was second rate, lighter power on the mainlines would find itself in pairs out on the branchlines......and then there was Rock Island commuter service around Chicago where they had a "Noah's Ark" motive power theory and if it ran - you used it until it failed....
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 12:50 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

In the western US, mixed trains on branchlines was horribly common, well into the 1960's.....Whatever was second rate, lighter power on the mainlines would find itself in pairs out on the branchlines......and then there was Rock Island commuter service around Chicago where they had a "Noah's Ark" motive power theory and if it ran - you used it until it failed....


Ahhh! Now that's the sort fo stuff I like to read! [:D]

Thanks mudchicken [;)] Can I quote you about mixed trains on branchlines ? Good stuff! [;)]
I've another model rail show to attend with the club exhibition layout in six weeks - much smaller than last weekend, (we got about 12,000 people through in 3 days) but still great fun - and I sure will be running mixed trains! heh heh![:D] Look out rivet counters! [:0]

Dave [:)]
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 6:20 AM
Dave,

The UP locomotives pictured as described above were actually RSC-2 units, with A1A trucks, specially designed for branchline service. These were numbered 1191 to 1190, later 1281 to 1290. There were also five RS-2s, 1291 to 1295. The pictures were in locomotive terminals, but there can be no doubt that the RSC-2s were branch line locomotives.

I don't have much UP-specific data, but two books I'd recommend about Santa Fe branch lines are "Coach Cabbage and Caboose" and "Doodlebugs", both by John McCall. I've been collecting railcars, branchline locomotives and combines to match those in the books. All Santa Fe, and where possible, the locomotives in black and silver from the 1940s and 1950s.

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 4:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M636C

Dave,

The UP locomotives pictured as described above were actually RSC-2 units, with A1A trucks, specially designed for branchline service. These were numbered 1191 to 1190, later 1281 to 1290. There were also five RS-2s, 1291 to 1295. The pictures were in locomotive terminals, but there can be no doubt that the RSC-2s were branch line locomotives.

I don't have much UP-specific data, but two books I'd recommend about Santa Fe branch lines are "Coach Cabbage and Caboose" and "Doodlebugs", both by John McCall. I've been collecting railcars, branchline locomotives and combines to match those in the books. All Santa Fe, and where possible, the locomotives in black and silver from the 1940s and 1950s.

Peter


Peter,thatks for the info. [:)] Sounds like the old Santa Fe is your area of interest? [;)]
Are your railcar and loco models in HO?

Dave
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 7:00 PM
Yes,

All the US models are HO (Except for a Lionel NYC Hudson and Scale PRR Turbine in O gauge!)

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, May 5, 2004 7:47 PM
Peter

I realise this is sliding off topic but...

Do you have layouts for the HO or O?

Dave
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, May 6, 2004 5:06 AM
The quick answer is not for O, that's too hard. For HO, it is still "not yet", I'm not yet that organised. The books and magazines and photographs occupy too many of the possible locations - or something like that.

I am too busy writing articles and so on. Besides, somone might ask how many model locomotives I own, and I'd have to count them!

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, May 6, 2004 7:19 AM
Dave

I forgot to add, at lunch, after photographing X52 and X51, I checked out Fisher's stock of RS-2s, and they didn't have any in UP colours.

Peter

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy