Trains.com

CNN refers to railfans as "Kookie"

2464 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
CNN refers to railfans as "Kookie"
Posted by eolafan on Friday, May 8, 2009 8:52 AM

I thought the attached article from CNN on the Internet this morning was going to be interesting but then I saw where it calls us "Kookie".  Yes, I know it wasn't CNN itself but a reference to what "non rail-fans" sometimes call us, however it was CNN that just couldn't resist using the term to attract interest of its readers...could they?  Read on by using the link below:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TRAVEL/05/08/railfan.train.watching/index.html?iref=t2test_travelfri

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,914 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Friday, May 8, 2009 9:14 AM

And here, I was looking for an Edd Byrnes reference.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 913 posts
Posted by mersenne6 on Friday, May 8, 2009 9:56 AM

I think you're reading too much into it.  Face it - if you do anything the least bit out of the ordinary (eat chips, drink beer, and grouse about TV and or Sports) someone somewhere is going to think you are "kookie".  I have a friend who is a bird watcher and after hearing some of his stories I'd have to say we don't know what snide comments are.

    I liked the article.  I also liked the fact that it made a point with respect to us and how we might spend our dollars - i.e. build something like the viewing stand and perhaps we'll drop by and while we're there spend some money on the local economy.  My friend has told me that when he and his friends visit someplace to go birding they will often spend money on the local economy (gas, food, hotel) and they make it a point to tell the various owners why they are there and why they might want to come back.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,924 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, May 8, 2009 10:09 AM

It's a nice article.  The only reference to "kooky" that I saw was a self-deprecating comment made by the subject of the story.  Colored us in a pretty good light, I'd say. 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, May 8, 2009 2:39 PM
A lot of us are pretty sharp kookies!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 1,092 posts
Posted by oskar on Friday, May 8, 2009 3:08 PM

I only saw "kookie" in a quote from Cookie. I still would rather watch trains than cars going around a track for hours on end.

Glad to see Cookie and Cricket back on CNN.

 

Kevin

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • 19 posts
Posted by The Conrail Kid on Friday, May 8, 2009 4:04 PM

CShaveRR
A lot of us are pretty sharp kookies!

 Something about this hit me the right way, and I've been laughing for the last 10 minutes. It must be Friday...

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Friday, May 8, 2009 4:34 PM

CShaveRR
A lot of us are pretty sharp kookies!

*** right we are Carl!

I guess my skin was just too thin today...after reading the piece a second time, it did not seem too derogatory at all to us railfans.

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Friday, May 8, 2009 10:41 PM

It struck me as a pretty good PR piece for railfans...I didn't read anything negative in there, in fact, it seem to promote the hobby.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, May 9, 2009 11:42 AM

tree68

It's a nice article.  The only reference to "kooky" that I saw was a self-deprecating comment made by the subject of the story.  Colored us in a pretty good light, I'd say. 

I agree with tree68.  Here is the only reference in the article to use any variation on the term "kook":

"A lot of people in this town thought I was on the kooky side," said Williams[local Folkston railfan - a.s.], who is retired from the paper and pulp industry. "But I love it. I've loved these trains ever since I was a kid."

Self-deprecation is the word!  - a.s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Saturday, May 9, 2009 1:42 PM

eolafan

I thought the attached article from CNN on the Internet this morning was going to be interesting but then I saw where it calls us "Kookie". 

Are you sure they didn't say, "Mookie"?

Whistling

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Saturday, May 9, 2009 1:45 PM

zardoz

eolafan

I thought the attached article from CNN on the Internet this morning was going to be interesting but then I saw where it calls us "Kookie". 

Are you sure they didn't say, "Mookie"?

Whistling

Maybe so, maybe so...but then again, there is only one REAL Mookie!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Saturday, May 9, 2009 2:59 PM

eolafan

zardoz

eolafan

I thought the attached article from CNN on the Internet this morning was going to be interesting but then I saw where it calls us "Kookie". 

Are you sure they didn't say, "Mookie"?

Whistling

Maybe so, maybe so...but then again, there is only one REAL Mookie!

  Blalock?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,810 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Saturday, May 9, 2009 9:33 PM

Well...kookie beats boring in my book.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, May 9, 2009 10:01 PM

oskar

I only saw "kookie" in a quote from Cookie. I still would rather watch trains than cars going around a track for hours on end.

Glad to see Cookie and Cricket back on CNN.

Kevin

I don't know about that (says he, with Nascar's Darlington race on the TV six inches to the left of my monitor screen.)  I've watched trains all over, ranging from 600mm gauge sugar cane lines to Shinkansen, and in half a century I didn't see as many blazing vehicles, damaging impacts and bent sheet metal as I've seen in the last three hours...

Closest I've seen was a string of box cars that had been in the way of a tornado!

Actually, I'm more interested in the civil engineering of the right-of-way than I am in seeing modern trains.  If that makes me, "Kookie," so be it.

Chuck

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,434 posts
Posted by dknelson on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 8:19 AM

I have seen some railfan antics, and I bet most of us have, for which "kookie" might well be the kindest possible term.  

I hate to diss my own beloved hobby but frankly it atracts some pretty strange scooters out there.

At Waterford Avenue on Milwaukee's South Side, we have often heard train crews tell each other "The Paparazzi are out tonight."  They are referring to us. 

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,477 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:02 PM

It doesn;t bother me they think I might be "kookie" because I know that they definitely are.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:13 PM

ndbprr

It doesn;t bother me they think I might be "kookie" because I know that they definitely are.

Funny - I've always referred to CNN as "kookie".

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:32 PM

I think the article is quite well written, informative, and a bit intertaining.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy