Trains.com

TRAINS magazine delivery time....

1773 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, April 17, 2004 8:30 AM
....Now wouldn't that be scary.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 16, 2004 11:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

.....Have just received May issue of TRAINS today...[4-6]....Is anyone elses arrival date this late....?[:O]
maybe yours is shipped by rail!!!
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, April 16, 2004 8:49 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevinstheRRman

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QM - call me and I will read mine to you, since I get it pretty much on the 1st!

[:D]

Mook


Is that offer open to me too?
on your dime or Canadian dollar, sure - and I will even explain the pictures!
And you could teach me French at the same time....say - there's a possibility.....

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 725 posts
Posted by Puckdropper on Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:27 PM
Is Trains just sent with a mailing label attached to it like Model Railroader?

This months Trains must have been very interesting for the USPS to read...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by toyomantrains

What's the problem with delivery time??? They are still a month in advance! I'm lucky if I get through the whole magazine (and all the others) before the next one arrives. I STILL haven't finished Marchs' Trains! I need a vacation to catch up.


I'm not complaining, I was just adding to the thread my personal experience.

Usually the Magazine arrives at the same time every month, but this month it was a week later than usual.

My guess was that the easter long weekend backed things up.

Funny thing was we didn't get any mail on the tuesday after either, then on the Wednesday a whole heap of mail came in, 80% of course was flyers and junk crap mail.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QM - call me and I will read mine to you, since I get it pretty much on the 1st!

[:D]

Mook


Is that offer open to me too?
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:54 PM
Gee...thanks Jen, but how would I look at the pictures...No, I have no problem...I've had mine now for perhaps a week and have pretty well sucked it all in...Especially the 35 mile tunnel article...But thanks for the offer...and I'll keep you in mind.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:47 PM
QM - call me and I will read mine to you, since I get it pretty much on the 1st!

[:D]

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:43 PM
Wow....what secrets.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:19 PM
Look, look

If i told you what the post offce workers did with them, i'd have to kill you. I know because i have "connections" Usually helps in expiditing things! So i wholeheartedly reccomend you get up and get to know your carrier, offer him somehting to eat and drink on occasioan, and your mail will never ever EVER be banged up again.

Trust me on that one.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:43 AM
....I for one don't blame TRAINS magazine for these eratic delivery times, it has to do with the means by which it travels to get to our respective locations and of course the handling of the traffic it travels in.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:39 AM
All magazines are a month in advance....Aren't we simply talking about consistent delivery times....

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:11 PM
What's the problem with delivery time??? They are still a month in advance! I'm lucky if I get through the whole magazine (and all the others) before the next one arrives. I STILL haven't finished Marchs' Trains! I need a vacation to catch up.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:41 PM
.....mine just arrived today, finally.

That damn long weekend screwed up the shipping time, usually it is here closer to a week previous to today.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 8:18 PM
Want an eye-opening experience? See if you can come up with any train pictures from about 30 years ago--darn near any railroad, as long as you're familiar with it--and see how track maintenance compares with that of today. Things really are better now. I go into the first or second editions of the Train Watcher's Guide to Chicago for my comparisons.

Of course, I shouldn't speak in exclusive terms, because I can think of a couple of railroads right now where track maintenance standards are a little suspect. Fortunately mine's not one of them.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 4:54 PM
Dear Steve: If you look closely at the track, you'll see that it's terrible track. How would a big, important, train run on time on track like this? Well, it wouldn't. The south main track has some fresh ballast dumped on it (the white rock), but if you look at it, you'll see it's just dumped there, not really tamped down under the ties where it belongs. Compare this track to an important main line today, and I hope this will be obvious to you.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 3:56 PM
Yes got mine very good

DOGGY
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 3:46 PM
I got mine on 4/6. I don't consider this late at all, in fact I think its fast. Most of my magazine that I subscribe to arrive at my door in the first 2-3 weeks of the month.

BTW speaking of this issue, seeing that I am a newbie to railroading I got a question. Hopefully I wont spoil the issue for those who have yet to get it. Anyways on the inside cover at the bottom there is 2 sentences that describes the cover. The second sentence says "Don't look too closely at the track." What does this mean? The only thing that caught my eye on the cover is the white material on the other track of the double track. Is this what they mean and if so whats the deal?

Thanks.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 2:12 PM
Trains is printed in Milwaukee, if not in many years by Kalmbach itself. Usually, it goes to the Quad plant at Duplainville (sometimes Sussex or West Allis), which I can practically see from my office window. That the printer is close by in this day and age is merely a coincidence; almost all magazines are direct-to-press and the information necessary to make the plates is transmitted electronically. Quad is one of the largest magazine printers in the world, and has plants scattered to the four corners of the U.S. to obtain lower distribution costs. Magazines such as National Geographic or Time often come out of eight or so printing plants, each handling a specific region.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 11:18 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Jordan6

It's odd that Kalmbach Publishing Co. is in Wisconson and I have yet to recieve my TRAINS and MR mags here in Iowa, but yet edblysard got his in Texas!!



Its not fair[(-D]!!!

P.S. No offense[:o)]
This is THE Ed Blysard you are talking about - think about it!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Wisconsin, USA
  • 175 posts
Posted by Jordan6 on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 11:00 AM
It's odd that Kalmbach Publishing Co. is in Wisconson and I have yet to recieve my TRAINS and MR mags here in Iowa, but yet edblysard got his in Texas!!



Its not fair[(-D]!!!

P.S. No offense[:o)]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 8:37 AM
...As posted above, I too received several magazines yesterday as well and just glancing through TRAINS...it looks to be another interesting one....30 some mile long tunnel, now that really should be interesting...!

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 7:55 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

I get mine about the 1st of every month - they don't want to deal with the Mookie on a late delivery!

Note to mailperson read sign
"beware of Cat!"[:)]
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 6:40 AM
I get mine about the 1st of every month - they don't want to deal with the Mookie on a late delivery!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 6:30 AM
Mine showed up in the swamp yesterday, 04/06.

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2001
  • From: New York City
  • 805 posts
Posted by eastside on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 12:52 AM
Received mine here in NYC last Friday.[:)] The variable factor is the USPS.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 12:29 AM
Kinda like shipping a car on the UP nowadays!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 12:24 AM
Every U.S. subscription copy of the magazine enters the postal system from the printer within the same two-day period every month. What the postal service does with them afterwards is no doubt interesting.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 11:45 PM
My May issue came yesterday, 4/5. In the recent past it had been coming late in the second month preceding the cover date, so I had been looking forward to this one for about a week. Can't get too upset, though...it'll be a week or so before I can actually find time to do more than glance at it (between yesterday and today, five magazines have arrived...all have gotten the glance treatment, but nothing beyond that).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy