Trains.com

Winona, Minnesota train/barge loadout

1775 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Tuesday, November 4, 2008 11:06 AM

ButchKnouse

To me, it seems like unloading a coal unit train onto a barge and then reversing the process somewhere down river would be a lot more work than just hauling the train to the power plant. Unless of course we are talking export coal.

Yes, but it has been done.  Don't know if it's still going on, but a number of years ago CSX was part of such a deal to haul coal from (I think) Kentucky to a powerplant in Palatka, FL.  The coal was put on barges to go down the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers, then thru the Intracoastal Waterway or the Gulf to (IIRC) Port St. Joe FL.  At PSJ the coal was transferred to hoppers; the Apalachicola Nortern delivered it to CSX's ex-SAL/L&N Jacksonville-New Orleans line somewhere (Chattahoochee, FL?), and CSX hauled it east to Palatka.  I used to watch the loaded trains bellowing upgrade on the east side of Tallahassee. 

Why would it be done that way?  I don't know.  This was a long-term contract, ten or twenty years.  One commentator said the power company thought the barge costs would be lower over the term of the contract than the RR costs.  Can't say whether that was the real reason or whether the idea was correct, but one would have to suppose that someone did quite a bit of "figuring" before signing onto a long-term contract.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Friday, October 17, 2008 1:12 PM

ButchKnouse

To me, it seems like unloading a coal unit train onto a barge and then reversing the process somewhere down river would be a lot more work than just hauling the train to the power plant. Unless of course we are talking export coal.

I've heard that most of the grain DM&E hauls ends up on barges at Winona.

When the coal hauling has been mentioned, they talk of hauling to power plants east of the Mississippi.

Some power plants were built without rail access. They can receive coal only by barge.  When the plants had to switch from Illinois Basin coal to Powder River Basin coal it became necessary to transload the trains into barges in order to reach these generating stations.

The I&M rail to water coal transfer facility at Havana, IL was built to transload Illinois coal into barges.  It now transloads PRB coal into barges.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, October 17, 2008 12:59 PM

     Interesting.  I guess I hadn't considered, that the coal might be coming off the barge, and onto the train.  I'm surprised that barge>UP>DM&E>Rochester shipping can be competitive with Barge>truck>Rochester shipping, comsidering the short haul.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Friday, October 17, 2008 11:01 AM

That barge loading facility is not railroad owned.  And the 'yard' across the street is the UP(ex-C&NW) yard.  DM&E delivers to the UP yard.  CP(ex-Milw) is across town.  The barge facility loads grain & rock, and unloads coal that is loaded into rail hoppers.  Rochester RPU plant recives rail hauled coal from the east and I suspect some of it comes from that facility.  I think they 'blend' low sulfer coal with high sulfer coal to meet EPA requirements.

  A rail to water coal transfer facility that can unload 100+ car trains and transfer the product to barge would have to be far larger.  Look at the large facility in Superior, WI.

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 371 posts
Posted by ButchKnouse on Friday, October 17, 2008 9:56 AM

To me, it seems like unloading a coal unit train onto a barge and then reversing the process somewhere down river would be a lot more work than just hauling the train to the power plant. Unless of course we are talking export coal.

I've heard that most of the grain DM&E hauls ends up on barges at Winona.

When the coal hauling has been mentioned, they talk of hauling to power plants east of the Mississippi.

Reality TV is to reality, what Professional Wrestling is to Professional Brain Surgery.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:55 PM

al-in-chgo

And just-plain "P" would be what kind of operating entity, Sir? 

 

  The Nothing Pacific? I went back and edited it for clarity.Blush

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:21 PM

And just-plain "P" would be what kind of operating entity, Sir? 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Winona, Minnesota train/barge loadout
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:55 PM

     I was in Winona over the weekend.  I recall from some past threads, that DM&E may have wanted to build a barge loading facility there, to send PRB coal down the Mississippi River.  It appears to me, that CP already has that capability?

     North of the highway bridge is a barge loading facility, between a city street and the river.  Accross the street to the west, is the CP yard(?).  There is also a big ADM grain handling facility of some sort.  It appears, that there are converer belts, and pipes running over the street to connect the two.  East of the street, were big piles of coal, and what looked to be limestone, ready to be barge loaded.

     Would this mean, that CP would be able to trans-ship PRB coal already, or would this be on too small of a scale?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy