CSSHEGEWISCH wrote: I would seriously doubt that Spain and Portugal are going to re-gauge anytime soon. Consider the expense of having to re-gauge all of their motive power and rolling stock, some of which may not be able to be re-gauged.A standard-gauge line parallel to an existing broad-gauge line is probably to allow for high-speed passenger service (TGV??) to the rest of Europe. There is a similar arrangement in Australia between Sydney and Melbourne. Australia also has dual-gauge trackage on the main line into Brisbane from New South Wales and near Perth in Western Australia.
I would seriously doubt that Spain and Portugal are going to re-gauge anytime soon. Consider the expense of having to re-gauge all of their motive power and rolling stock, some of which may not be able to be re-gauged.
A standard-gauge line parallel to an existing broad-gauge line is probably to allow for high-speed passenger service (TGV??) to the rest of Europe. There is a similar arrangement in Australia between Sydney and Melbourne. Australia also has dual-gauge trackage on the main line into Brisbane from New South Wales and near Perth in Western Australia.
The line from Barcelona to the border at Port Bou is graded and ready for tracklaying out in the countryside. But the final route within Barcelona and Girona, hasn't been finalized yet, in typical Spanish fashion they leave the hardest part till last, then with an election looming they panic and throw tons of money at the project so the Ruling party can claim credit for completing it.
For Paul, RENFE specified that the 150 new Bombardier TRAXX freight locomotives on order, be built so that only a truck swap would be required to change them from broad to standard gauge, and only the truck frames, and wheelsets wouldn't be reuseable. So there must be some thought that they might change within the lifetimes of these locomotives. Also the Standard gauge line from Barcelona to the French border is intended to be used by freights during the nighttime hours. This will give the Barcelona area a big edge for better freight service and would create pressure to slowly change most of the rest of the Broad gauge network. The Ford Auto Assembly plant at Silla would be a beneficiary of this change, currently most Autoparts containers are trucked from Port Bou, since two transloads in less than 100 miles isn't economical, similarly finished Autos are trucked to France and loaded there, rather than at the plant.
CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:A standard-gauge line parallel to an existing broad-gauge line is probably to allow for high-speed passenger service (TGV??) to the rest of Europe. There is a similar arrangement in Australia between Sydney and Melbourne. Australia also has dual-gauge trackage on the main line into Brisbane from New South Wales and near Perth in Western Australia.
markpierce wrote: greyhounds wrote: markpierce wrote: The track gauge of The Ferrocarril Austral Fueguino (Southern Fueguean Railway), former logging-now-tourist railroad located near Ushuaia, Tierra Del Fuego, Argentina, is 50 centimeters, or 19.68 inches. Their primary motive power includes two 0-4-0+0-4-0s, of which the most recent one was built a couple years ago in South Africa.MarkI'd like to know the deceision process and factors that caused them to use a gauge that narrow.Well, a governmental bureaucrat was probably involved in deciding on the half-meter track gauge since the railroad was part of a prison operation. My thought is that the gauge is about the smallest that can handle human operators, and the government wanted the cheapest railroad that would work.
greyhounds wrote: markpierce wrote: The track gauge of The Ferrocarril Austral Fueguino (Southern Fueguean Railway), former logging-now-tourist railroad located near Ushuaia, Tierra Del Fuego, Argentina, is 50 centimeters, or 19.68 inches. Their primary motive power includes two 0-4-0+0-4-0s, of which the most recent one was built a couple years ago in South Africa.MarkI'd like to know the deceision process and factors that caused them to use a gauge that narrow.
markpierce wrote: The track gauge of The Ferrocarril Austral Fueguino (Southern Fueguean Railway), former logging-now-tourist railroad located near Ushuaia, Tierra Del Fuego, Argentina, is 50 centimeters, or 19.68 inches. Their primary motive power includes two 0-4-0+0-4-0s, of which the most recent one was built a couple years ago in South Africa.Mark
The track gauge of The Ferrocarril Austral Fueguino (Southern Fueguean Railway), former logging-now-tourist railroad located near Ushuaia, Tierra Del Fuego, Argentina, is 50 centimeters, or 19.68 inches. Their primary motive power includes two 0-4-0+0-4-0s, of which the most recent one was built a couple years ago in South Africa.
Mark
I'd like to know the deceision process and factors that caused them to use a gauge that narrow.
Well, a governmental bureaucrat was probably involved in deciding on the half-meter track gauge since the railroad was part of a prison operation. My thought is that the gauge is about the smallest that can handle human operators, and the government wanted the cheapest railroad that would work.
JonathanS wrote: Why would the Russians need to change the gauge of the Trans Siberian? The technology already exists to change the gauge on the cars. There is through passenger service from Berlin, Warsaw, Etc. to many points in the former Soviet Union. The gauge of the wheelsets are changed at the border with the former USSR.The same thing happens at the Spanish - French border. The run through cars (and locomotives on the Talgo) have the gauge changed at the border.It would be far simpler to have sets of intermodal flats or well cars with variable gauge trucks than to completely change the Russian track gauge.
Why would the Russians need to change the gauge of the Trans Siberian? The technology already exists to change the gauge on the cars. There is through passenger service from Berlin, Warsaw, Etc. to many points in the former Soviet Union. The gauge of the wheelsets are changed at the border with the former USSR.
The same thing happens at the Spanish - French border. The run through cars (and locomotives on the Talgo) have the gauge changed at the border.
It would be far simpler to have sets of intermodal flats or well cars with variable gauge trucks than to completely change the Russian track gauge.
Changing of the bogies is featured in the currently-released movie "Transiberian" when the trains goes from China to Russia.
blue streak 1 wrote:Tulyar15: The last time I went through Port Boa (on the Mediterrnean coast) the Spanish were constructing a new standard guage line from the border to Barcelona. I do not know its progress but maybe you have access to that information. Spain is finally getting on the standard guage bandwgon.
R. T. POTEET wrote: I think I remember reading something relatively recently that in an effort to speed up intermodal deliveries to Western Europe the Japanese once approached the Russians about regauging the Trans-Siberia to 4'8½"; according to what I read the Japanese proposed that they would foot the bill for all of the intermodal equipment to be used. The Russians still display considerable 19th Century paranoia and rejected the proposal.Now that, my friend, is a Trans-continental Railroad!!!!!
I think I remember reading something relatively recently that in an effort to speed up intermodal deliveries to Western Europe the Japanese once approached the Russians about regauging the Trans-Siberia to 4'8½"; according to what I read the Japanese proposed that they would foot the bill for all of the intermodal equipment to be used. The Russians still display considerable 19th Century paranoia and rejected the proposal.
Now that, my friend, is a Trans-continental Railroad!!!!!
AltonFan wrote:I also seem to remember that during the Cold War, all Warsaw Pact countries were equipped with dual-guage track (5' and 4' 8.5") to facilitate Russian movement through the captive nations.
No, this is incorrect. The Warsaw Pact countries all remained standard gauge - there was no dual-gauging as you suggest.
Cheers,
Mark.
R. T. POTEET wrote: Weren't the military supply railroads in France in WWI built to a gauge of 60cm?I think I remember reading something relatively recently that in an effort to speed up intermodal deliveries to Western Europe the Japanese once approached the Russians about regauging the Trans-Siberia to 4'8½"; according to what I read the Japanese proposed that they would foot the bill for all of the intermodal equipment to be used. The Russians still display considerable 19th Century paranoia and rejected the proposal.Now that, my friend, is a Trans-continental Railroad!!!!!
Weren't the military supply railroads in France in WWI built to a gauge of 60cm?
I remember watching a documentary about a Russian rail route which had service to destinations in China. IIRC, when the Russian trains got to the border, the cars were jacked off their 5' guage trucks, and replaced with Chinese 4' 8.5" guage trucks.
I also seem to remember that during the Cold War, all Warsaw Pact countries were equipped with dual-guage track (5' and 4' 8.5") to facilitate Russian movement through the captive nations.
I remember reading back in the 1980s, that the Russians were trying to negotiate installing 5' guage track in parts of West Germany and perhaps Denmark, ostensibly for trade.
Dan
erikem wrote: 5'6" gauge is also used by BART in the US. The wide gauge was supposedly picked so the trains would be stable with respect to the winds blowing across the Golden Gate bridge - the line to Marin County would have used the bridge if Marin had voted in favor of joining BART.
5'6" gauge is also used by BART in the US. The wide gauge was supposedly picked so the trains would be stable with respect to the winds blowing across the Golden Gate bridge - the line to Marin County would have used the bridge if Marin had voted in favor of joining BART.
Marin Countyites doesn't much want public transportation on land routes (except for limited bus service) through their jurisdiction. This is evidenced by their refusal of BART service and now-current efforts to block reopening of the Northwestern Pacific. They want to keep development to a minimum. This is done with highly-restrictive land-use policies, high bridge tolls, and funneling monies into high-fare, uneconomic ferry service.
Tulyar15 wrote:5' 6" gauge, as well as being used in Spain, Portugal, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh (the last 4 countries were all part of the British Empire of India) is also I believe used in Argentina and Chile.
CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:Australia indeed has three gauges: 3'6" (not meter) in Queensland and Western Australia, 5'3" in Victoria and parts of South Australia, and 4'8.5" everywhere else including some dual-gauge main lines in Victoria and Queensland.
CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:India has two gauges: 5'3" and meter gauge. Both are large networks although the meter gauge is gradually being converted to 5'3".
greyhounds wrote:I thought India (and Pakistan) were 5' 6", not 5'
I thought India (and Pakistan) were 5' 6", not 5'
Two thoughts on guage. Coal mines would pick a guage that fit their operating needs. May width of seam and would move locos and cars to other locations and change guage. ie any width possible.
Spain is changing all their main lines to 4' 8-1/2" to interchange equipment with France. Madrid- Barcelona has been completed. Don't know about Portugal.
I don't get it. If the traffic is intermodal, why would one want to change gauges to avoid one point of modal change in a 7000(?) mile journey when the majority of the traveled railroad would require modification? The whole idea of intermodal is to have an efficient method of transporting goods from one mode of transportation to another (as between railroad, truck, ship. and railroads of different gauge)? Will someone enlighten me? If Japan was willing to pay for the regauging, then that is another thing. Thanks.
If Russia's unwillingness to regauge its railroads to conform with European standard gauge would be a significant financial benefit by avoiding transferring containers between trains of a different gauge, then this is one reason Russia will never meet its potential for being a wealthy country with happy citizens... If so, like many under-achieving nations (as far as economic development is concerned), Russiaian government thinking has been poor.
hahahahaha... The cost of the equipement would be 100th the cost of redoing the gauge and then still halve to boat it across to Japan. It would be cheaper for Europe and japan to go russian gauge.
Worth a try though.
R. T. POTEET wrote: Weren't the military supply railroads in France in WWI built to a gauge of 60cm?
From Wikipedia:
"Trench Railways represented military adaptation of early 20th century railway technology to the problem of keeping soldiers supplied during the static trench warfare phase of World War I. The large concentrations of soldiers and artillery at the front lines required delivery of enormous quantities of food, ammunition and fortification construction materials where transportation facilities had been destroyed. Reconstruction of conventional roads and railways was too slow, and fixed facilities were attractive targets for enemy artillery. Trench railways linked the front with standard gauge railway facilities beyond the range of enemy artillery. Empty cars often carried litters returning wounded from the front.
"France had developed portable Decauville railways for agricultural areas, small scale mining, and temporary construction projects. France had standardized 60-centimenter gauge military Decauville equipment and Germany adopted similar feldbahn of the same gauge. British War Department Light Railways and the United States Army Transportation Corps used the French 60-centimeter gauge system. Russia used Decauville 60-centimeter and 75-centimeter systems."
Richard Dunn's book Narrow Gauge to No Man's Lands discusses the US Army's 60 cm railways in WWI France.
greyhounds wrote:I thought India (and Pakistan) were 5' 6", not 5' 3".The gauge issue is interesting. AFAIK, the smallest commercial rail operations were a two foot gauge (or just under). The largest was just over 7 feet.George Hilton deals with the issue in his "American Narrow Gauge Railroads". Aparently, to this day, no one knows what the optimal gauge is. Not that it matters. 4' 8.5" is the settled "standard" from the Mexican-Guatamalan border to Fairbanks, Alaska, as well as in Europe, China and elsewhere. And that isn't going to change.
I thought India (and Pakistan) were 5' 6", not 5' 3".
The gauge issue is interesting. AFAIK, the smallest commercial rail operations were a two foot gauge (or just under). The largest was just over 7 feet.
George Hilton deals with the issue in his "American Narrow Gauge Railroads". Aparently, to this day, no one knows what the optimal gauge is. Not that it matters. 4' 8.5" is the settled "standard" from the Mexican-Guatamalan border to Fairbanks, Alaska, as well as in Europe, China and elsewhere. And that isn't going to change.
Standard Gauge is close enough to ideal that even when all-new, disconnected, single-purpose railways are constructed today where a different gauge would not create significant extra cost, no one bothers to waste the client's money studying if some other gauge might be more cost-effective to move the freight or passengers. Standard Gauge could have been anywhere from roughly 4"6" to 5"3" and been just fine.
RWM
markpierce wrote: greyhounds wrote: ...The gauge issue is interesting. AFAIK, the smallest commercial rail operations were a two foot gauge (or just under). The largest was just over 7 feet....The track gauge of The Ferrocarril Austral Fueguino (Southern Fueguean Railway), former logging-now-tourist railroad located near Ushuaia, Tierra Del Fuego, Argentina, is 50 centimeters, or 19.68 inches. Their primary motive power includes two 0-4-0+0-4-0s, of which the most recent one was built a couple years ago in South Africa.Mark
greyhounds wrote: ...The gauge issue is interesting. AFAIK, the smallest commercial rail operations were a two foot gauge (or just under). The largest was just over 7 feet....
...The gauge issue is interesting. AFAIK, the smallest commercial rail operations were a two foot gauge (or just under). The largest was just over 7 feet....
There is also a shrinking network of 610mm (roughly 24") routes in South Africa. Check out the baby GE's that are used: http://www.locopage.net./afr-pics.htm Scroll down to South Africa for the UM6B's.
The Russian paranoia over invasion is deeply ingrained into the psyche of the Russian people over the centuries and isn't going away anytime soon.
From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet
Rather looks as if the Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch is the 'narrowest' commercial (non-amusement park) railway operation. It operates 1/4-scale steam (some of US design) - and a school train for the local education establishment.
For the teenagers present, how would you like to go to school on a 15-inch-gauge 'school bus?'
Chuck
A list of gauges used throughout railroad history:
http://www.parovoz.com/spravka/gauges-en.php
Scot
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.