Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
What do you think of this? - bad crossings and good drivers
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
> > dear angels on track, <br />> > > <br />> > > I agree with your effort's to get railroad crossing's to be <br />> > better <br />> > > lighted with crossing light's, gates, etc. But I must say that <br />> > your <br />> > > slogan of " Bad crossing's kill good driver's" is not even true. <br />> > First <br />> > > off, the railroad has been here for over 150 years. Back in the <br />> > old day's <br />> > > train's crossed crossing's that only had a crossing sign at over <br />> > 90 MPH. <br />> > > People did not get killed. They looked, listened, and then crossed <br />> > the <br />> > > track. A driver that does not take the time to look before they <br />> > cross is <br />> > > stupid. The railroad has al way's had the right of way, and will <br />> > al <br />> > > way's. There is nothing that can be done about that. If you want <br />> > to make <br />> > > a difference, put the responsibility where it belong's. On the <br />> > stupid <br />> > > driver that think's that he or she does not have to slow down, <br />> > look, or <br />> > > listen. The Federal law requires engineers to blow there horn. Now <br />> > The <br />> > > engineer also suffers with a death at a crossing. many people have <br />> > had to <br />> > > get serious care because at night they dream of the face of the <br />> > child <br />> > > staring at them just before impact and there is nothing that they <br />> > can do. <br />> > > Please. They are just doing there job. They are just as innocent <br />> > as the <br />> > > person that crossed in front of the train and got hit. This nation <br />> > has <br />> > > gone way to far in not putting the responsibility on the person <br />> > who is <br />> > > actually responsible. So again I agree with you trying to get <br />> > more <br />> > > protection, but your slogan is false. If they were good drivers <br />> > they <br />> > > would not have pulled out in front of that train. <br />> > > <br />> > > B.P. <br />> <br />> > Mr. Porter. Thank you for contacting our Foundation, and while <br />> > you state you take exception to our slogan "Bad Crossings Kill <br />> > Good Drivers", I must tell you that the opinions of others will <br />> > never <br />> > alter the mission or focus of our Foundation. <br />> > <br />> > This slogan was not just pulled out of a hat. It is based on fact. <br />> > Only approximately 20% of our nation's railroad crossings are <br />> > protected with gates. Most, if not all, railroad crossings do not <br />> > meet FHWA/AASHTO sight line requirements for safe passage <br />> > across tracks. Even crossings with protection (gates and lights) <br />> > malfunction. Crossings with passive markings (crossbucks, stop <br />> > signs, Buckeye crossbucks) do not warn of an approaching train. <br />> > All of these are BAD CROSSINGS and kill hundreds of people <br />> > each year. To believe that all railroad crossing accidents are <br />> > caused by irresponsible motorists, is a unfounded stereotype that <br />> > has been accepted by unknowing individuals. <br />> > <br />> > And contrary to your statement ("back in the old days train's <br />> > crossed <br />> > crossings that only had a crossing sign at over 90 mph. <br />> > People did not get killed").... thousands were killed each year <br />> > and thousands were injured during the late 1800's and early/mid <br />> > 1900's. Crossing accidents have only decreased due to railroad <br />> > mergers, <br />> > crossing consolidations and closures, and installation of <br />> > protection <br />> > devices (gates). The safest year in railroad history (1999), 1369 <br />> > people were injured and 402 people lost their lives. I find that <br />> > solemn <br />> > statistic to brag about, especially to those, like myself, who have <br />> > lost <br />> > a loved one to a dangerous crossing. <br />> > <br />> > To say all you have to do is look, listen and cross, is a dangerous <br />> > assumption and a deadly one at best. If you can't see down the <br />> > tracks <br />> > because sight obstructions such as trees, buildings, brush, parked <br />> > railroad <br />> > equipment, how can a motorist tell if a train is coming? If the FRA <br />> > whistle <br />> > ban is adopted <br />> > this coming December trains will not sound their horns at whistle <br />> > posts <br />> > posted 1/4 mile down the track, what will you listen for? Do you <br />> > honestly think that the railroad companies and their employees <br />> > always <br />> > follow required safety procedures such as train speeds, flagging <br />> > crossings <br />> > that have malfunctioned, etc., and the railroad companies have no <br />> > responsibility <br />> > for public safety? <br />> > <br />> > The fact is there is alot that can be done about dangerous railroad <br />> > crossings. <br />> > First, there is no excuse why all railroad crossings are not <br />> > protected with <br />> > properly functioning gates. Second, there is nothing precluding <br />> > the <br />> > railroads <br />> > from funding installation of protection (gates), they just choose <br />> > not to. <br />> > Third, <br />> > instead of always blaming the motorists for virtually all railroad <br />> > crossing <br />> > accidents, <br />> > current educational programs and organizations (funded by railroads) <br />> > should <br />> > present an unbiased message, based on facts, to address the true <br />> > causes <br />> > for railroad crossing accidents. These messages are used to focus <br />> > on the <br />> > victim and not the railroads conscious disregard for public safety. <br />> > Fourth, <br />> > all speed tapes and event recorders should be turned over to an <br />> > independent <br />> > agency after an accident, not the railroads involved. Also taking <br />> > into <br />> > account <br />> > most highway patrol, sheriff departments, emergency personnel, and <br />> > first <br />> > aid responders have been trained by our nation's railroads in <br />> > "railroad grade <br />> > <br />> > crossing accident investigation" to determine the cause. Now who do <br />> > you <br />> > think they will find at fault? <br />> > <br />> > You might be interested in knowing that we have the continued <br />> > support and <br />> > well wishes from current and past railroad employees. We also have <br />> > the support from experts within the railroad industry. To tell me <br />> > that you <br />> > support our Foundation's goals to install gates at all crossings, <br />> > but then <br />> > take exception with our slogan, can only be taken as lack of <br />> > knowledge <br />> > on your part as to what needs to change. Nowhere in our slogan do <br />> > we <br />> > mention railroad employees, we address the crossings. And, bad <br />> > crossings <br />> > also kill railroad employees. You might want to visit the <br />> > http://www.csx-sucks.com <br />> > website. Go to safety. Read the posts from those employees. They <br />> > support <br />> > what we are saying, and confirm the lack of concern that exists <br />> > today for <br />> > dangerous crossings. And, we also have the RRESQ link posted on <br />> > our <br />> > website (Crossing To Safety section). If we were not interested in <br />> > the <br />> > safety of all, public and railroad employees, why would we have a <br />> > link on <br />> > our website? <br />> > <br />> > I will not argue with you. I will repeat that you are sadly <br />> > mistaken <br />> > and too readily willing to accept what has been accepted for far too <br />> > long <br />> > as to what causes these accidents. Only those people with a <br />> > sincere <br />> > wi***o stop these needless tragedies, will open up their minds and <br />> > look at the other side of the story............that which has not <br />> > been <br />> > told in the past. May God send peace and understanding to your <br />> > heart to understand our Foundation. <br />> > <br />> > Vicky L. Moore, Trustee <br />> > The Angels on Track Foundation <br />> > Crossing To Safety <br />> > "BAD CROSSINGS KILL GOOD DRIVERS" (R) <br />> > <br />> > <br />> > <br />> > Well Vicky L. Moore, <br />> <br />> Thank you for at least writing back. I have to say that I am <br />> ignorant of some thing's and you have given me some interesting info. I <br />> thank you for that information, but I believe that you also are ignorant <br />> of some thing's, but you said "I will not argue with you. I will repeat <br />> that you are sadly mistaken". That lead's me to believe that you are not <br />> as you said ready to "open up their minds and look at the other side of <br />> the story......" So I will not waist your time or mine. Good luck in your <br />> work and I wish you well. <br />> Have a super day <br />> <br />> B.P. <br /> <br />I say, if a crossing is dangerous, drivers should be more careful!
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy