Trains.com

Getting Hit by a Train

3339 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, March 6, 2004 2:27 AM
The story that I mentioned back near the beginning of this topic turned out to be a suicide. This short recap of the incident was on the website of the local newspaper.

BYLINE:
CREDITLINE: Star Tribune
HEADLINE: Man killed by train in Oakdale

A man was killed in Oakdale early this morning when he lay across the path
of an oncoming train, police said.
An Oakdale officer driving southbound in the 3000 block of Hadley Avenue saw
the man about
1:53 a.m. He was not dressed for the weather and was walking north.
When
the officer returned to check on the man, he began running west along the
railroad
tracks, police said. The officer saw a train approaching and yelled for the
man to stop. The officer didn't follow the man down the tracks, police said.
As the eastbound train approached, the man stopped, looked at the train and
then lay across the tracks, police said. He was killed on impact.
Police later found an unattended and recently parked vehicle in the area.
The man has not been positively identified, but police said he is white and
appeared to be in his early 20s.
Oakdale Police and the Ramsey County Medical Examiner's office are handling
the case.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 5, 2004 10:43 PM
I'll add my close call story. Evanston IL had 5 tracks on an embankment, 2 for the El and 3 for the C&NW. I was in 7th grade walking home from school on the tracks when a '400' came down the express track. He blew the horn and we got out of the way. But he stayed on the horn, we thought he was being a jerk. A 90 mph passenger train blowing the horn is so loud you can't hear anything else. As the engine passed our eyes followed and S**T!! An El train was already so close we could see the motorman's eyes bugging out and we were standing on his track. No time to think, we instinctively dove off the embankment. Somehow I wound up with my face inches from the rail. The motorman slammed on the brakes and the wheels were locked up. Every wheel that passed showered me with hot sparks like they were 700 pound grinding wheels. The overhang of the train was above me and I didn't dare move so I got showered by the whole train.

That guy never walked home with me after that. I wonder now if this flatted spotted the wheels and cost the El a lot of money to true
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 28, 2004 12:37 AM
Some are accidents, many are suicides. Sad. But the rest are stupidity.

Living in southern California, I have seen a lot of it!!!! And even if it is 10:20 PM, here I go:

For many years in the 20th century, many people had a great respect for trains, and many of them enjoyed stopping to see a SOO line local pass with a 4-6-2. But today, all too many people view anything keeping them from where they want to be as an unacceptable imposition, ignoring the fact that the cell phone in their right hand and the coffee in their left both probably traveled by the thing they are trying to race to the crossing. Being a railfan, I don't have to worry about resisting urges to beat a train to a crossing: I don't get them--I like to slow down and watch, even if it's just a light rail car. And I don't go again until the arms are fully up and the lights have stopped flashing--mostly because I hope another train is just around the corner. But aside from other railfans, most people just rip through the crossing, regarding the bumps from the tracks as an annoyance to their lifes. They drive around in their automobiles which are gigantic in the realm of cars--thinking that the DASH-9 around the corner has the same braking capability as they do, and that it will yield to them, and that if it hits them it will be a small dent which the railroad will pay for; all three of which are incredibly false! I see people race trains through crossings on foot. THESE PEOPLE ARE IDIOTS. I'd like to turn them into one thirteenth of a hamburger pickle! And this gives rise to my ultimate solution to keep people from racing trains to crossings:

Make everyone a railfan. They will be reluctant to start moving again after the train goes by!

But short of that, it really amazes me what stupid things people can do. And then there are the drivers stupid enough to stop on a crossing when they come to a red light. These people are increscently amazing. If only we could have a few doubleheading Big Boys here in southern California to shake the ground as they pass, and teach people a little respect for railways.

Of course the root of all this is that railways are deamed perpetually "uncool" in today's society, where what is "in" becomes "out" fifteen seconds before it was "in" in the first place! All that most of the stupid people hit by trains care about is what is "cool," and unfortunately obeying crossing arms and staying alive is not, much less enjoying the spectacle which is the American railroad. Case in point: we had to put crossing arms on the wrong side of the street because people were driving around the existing ones!!!!

I hope you enjoyed my ramblings,
Daniel
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 27, 2004 8:16 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevinstheRRman

Yeah, But i like the Quarter pounder Example.


Of course, if you were hit by a train you would look like a Quarter Pounder too. All ground up with lots of ketchup...

LC
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Memory Lane, on the sunny side of the street.
  • 737 posts
Posted by ironhorseman on Friday, February 27, 2004 3:09 PM
After much searching I found the infamous Downers Grove video on the interent yesterday, but I don't feel that the website is appropriate enough to link to here. It contains other videos of people getting killed and other vulger and obscene conduct.

But I watched it yesterday over and over again. The clip provided is only 6 seconds and I'm about to conclude that the girl that got hit was not entirely at fault (but don't misunderstand, the train was NOT AT ALL at fault) and here's my reason why. I remember the scene from TV where they showed about 30-45 seconds of the tape. People rushing across the tracks (on foot) as the bells were ringing, lights flasing, train horn blowing. On the side of the tracks the camera is on is a green Burlington Northern F-unit passenger train stopped just short of the crossing. The train that hits the girl is also the same kind. So the view to the left of the oncoming train is blocked. What appears to be a woman carrying some sort of bag in both arms puts a foot on the rail, looks left, sees the train, then turns back to wait from where she came from. Seconds later what appears to be a man in a gray trench coat starts across (from the side of the tracks the camera is on) and the girl, a foot shorter than him (probably teenager or older) is following on his right just slightly behind him. The man gets the track the speeding train is on, looks left, then stops. The girl never looked both ways, then man on her left was blocking her view. She appeared to be following his lead. But the man never made any attempt to grab this girl's arm or body to stop her. He looked left and turned around to his left. In the 1 second it took him to move this direction and avoid being hit the girl stepped in front of the train, looked left, and was caught by the wheels of the locomotive between her ankles and shins and was thrown toward the feet of the camera or the legs of the camera tripod, whatever the case, knocking the camera over, the last couple frames are a blur. The is an obvious red streak at the bottom of the film frames before the camera is knocked over. From the looks of it I'll guess the man had know idea this girl was behind him and didn't know she was hit until well after her body knocked the camera over, many seconds later.

Why did she do this? Why did she follow this man? Did she feel safer crossing the tracks with someone? Did she think she could make it? Take a psychology class and figure it out because I can't answer those questions. Human rationale is a strange thing. Think how wide a standard guage track is. 4 feet, 8 1/2 inches. How fast can you cross a distance of 4 feet, 8 1/2 inches? It's just "over there." If I can just make it this small distance it won't take very long and that train is oh so far off. I'll tell you 4 feet 8 1/2 inches and 6 seconds can change your life in an instant. What was it that couldn't wait 6 seconds for the train to reach the crossing? What was it that couldn't wait the 60 seconds for the train to clear the crossing? It's unfortunate what happend to her. It's also unfortunate no one tried to stop those two from going across. She didn't see the train coming because the other stopped train blocked the view and the man blocked her view, but she knew the lights and bells and horns were going.

I don't get any thrill describing the account but I think that maybe a video or description this shocking should be told so that others won't do it. People get mad that trains make them late but they don't see it as a perfect excuse to be late, because odds are they're going somewhere they don't want to be (i.e. work, school, the doctor, etc.) Many times at one place I used to work people came in late because the train made them late, but what's the first thought on their mind when they get to work? "How soon can I leave?"

Just slow down and wait. Don't be selfish. Some people think about themselves and how inconvienced they are by trains and some don't care that they might get killed racing the train. But they need to think about those who care about them and think how their friends and family will feel if they got a call saying their loved one was killed by a train.

yad sdrawkcab s'ti

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 27, 2004 9:39 AM
I remember reading a few years ago about students at Arizona State University playing a new game of chicken with trains. The rail line runs within a few blocks of the University and a half block of Mill Avenue, where all the partying used to go on. (Maybe it still does.) Anyway, the gist of the game was to hang out on the main line with the winner being the one who stayed on the tracks the longest before the train actually got there. I can't imagine the heart attacks that caused for the crews of the SP freights running through town... but I do know that at least one kid was killed (I guess he won the game). Sometimes you have to think a college education is wasted on some people... but then again, it proves that Darwin's Theory is alive and well....
I also remember the station agent in my home town in Connecticut back in the 60's talking about suicide by train a lot.

Erik
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Lancashire - UK
  • 74 posts
Posted by oubliette on Friday, February 27, 2004 7:03 AM
"And suicide by train seems to be on the rise."

[xx(] This is true here in the UK. What people forget though is that besides the tragedy for the victims family and train crew who have to live with this, the poor depot staff have to deal with this by cleaning up the mess.

We recently had a locomotive on the depot whereby a woman jumped off the station platform into the front of a speeding 75mph passenger train. The impact severely dented the front of the loco, there was blood and entrails over the front of the loco. Apologies for graphic details but all this has to be cleaned off by someone. The worse case is if they go under the wheels, the destruction of the human torso is so severe.

Its bad enough having to clean cattle etc from underneath and the smell is unbelievable. Its not a pretty site to clean pieces of flesh from beneath locomotives but unfortunately someone has to do it. An incident such as the above one cause much work for many people. The driver was interviewed by the police.....not a lot he can do to avoid the impact. The police attend the site of incident and also came to look at the locomotive. The locomotive has to have a brake test to see if it was at fault - I kid you not.

Its unfortunate that this is what railroads across the globe have to deal with. Some are purely accidents but many are suicides. Sad but true.

Cheers

Rory
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Friday, February 27, 2004 6:40 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by emory

QUOTE: Originally posted by mbartel

A person getting hit by a train is like smacking a fly with a fly swatter
Unfortunately it is, but the crew still has to live with the consequences even though they were not at fault. And suicide by train seems to be on the rise.


I read that topic too!
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=12825

I must say that the content of that topic is frighteningly graphic, but not totally inappropriate for this forum. However, we should keep in mind that some of the members here are not adults.

On the other hand messages that strong, may save lives.

Perhaps if the young man, who I refered to earlier in this topic, had read this topic or that one he would still be alive today.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 27, 2004 3:14 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mbartel

A person getting hit by a train is like smacking a fly with a fly swatter
Unfortunately it is, but the crew still has to live with the consequences even though they were not at fault. And suicide by train seems to be on the rise.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 27, 2004 2:51 AM
A person getting hit by a train is like smacking a fly with a fly swatter
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Thursday, February 26, 2004 11:15 PM
I'm afraid there are still stupid people out there, though their numbers get smaller every day.

Just last night, less than 10 miles from my house, along the old route of the 400's, another "Quarter Pounder" became cheese. Appearently he was on foot until the train caught up to him.

I guess some people just don't get it, until THEY GET IT!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:32 PM
Thank You for the Info
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Memory Lane, on the sunny side of the street.
  • 737 posts
Posted by ironhorseman on Thursday, February 26, 2004 3:34 PM
I saw the Downer's Grove clip on the internet, maybe 3-4 years ago now? The first time I saw was on TV where it stops the last fram before impact. I wasn't looking for it on the internet but just happened across it when I was at a school computer so didn't save the link, but it was shown in it's entirety. The little girl's body is tossed like a rag doll and hits the camera. Wasn't the engine a BN F-unit? And the same website had other goof-balls trying to beat the train. One guy on a bicycle goes through after the gates are down and he smiles and waves at the camera.

And speaking of beer cans and hamburger why not combine both analogies? Hamburger INSIDE a beer can. The meat is the person, the can is the car. The results are the same. And go ahead and use beer can because arn't more automobile wrecks caused by someone under the influence?

yad sdrawkcab s'ti

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 26, 2004 3:05 PM
QUOTE:
The show "Real TV" did a bit with Operation Lifesaver where they mounted cameras inside a school bus and ran two locomotives through it. Pretty scary pictures.


I saw that episode just the other day. The locomotive looks like superman going through those veichles.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 286 posts
Posted by dekemd on Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68

[
It's probably too bad that the clip I've seen of the Downers Grove incident stops just BEFORE the impact. Gory as it would be, some people just need to see the aftermath, too. Otherwise you've left to hope that she stopped at just the last moment and nothing bad happened after all.


I don't have the link anymore but the full clip is on the internet somewhere. It's not a pretty picture.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

OK - let me ask this. In this enlightened day and age of video games with all the violence, does this take some of the fear factor out of what a train can do?


But of course!!!! You can get right up and keep going!!! Add to that the bit of invincibility that is especially present in teenagers, but that many people carry through their lives, and you've got something.

It's probably too bad that the clip I've seen of the Downers Grove incident stops just BEFORE the impact. Gory as it would be, some people just need to see the aftermath, too. Otherwise you've left to hope that she stopped at just the last moment and nothing bad happened after all.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:38 AM
OK - let me ask this. In this enlightened day and age of video games with all the violence, does this take some of the fear factor out of what a train can do?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:27 AM
There have been quite a few set-up incidents of a train plowing through a car stopped on a crossing, and filmed for that reason. Something about these staged incidents may lead someone to believe that they aren't what would really happen. I think the pictures Ed posted of the UP employee going in front of the light rail vehicle were more convincing.

But, as I said on a post a while back, there is nothing as scary as a real incident captured on film, such as the lady struck by a Metra train in Downers Grove (very similar circumstances to what happened in River Grove this week). A railfan happened to have his video camera in the right place at the right time (or wrong time). I can remember that scene more vividly than footage from any movie I've seen.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:31 AM
Yeah, But i like the Quarter pounder Example.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:17 AM
The example I was taught by Operation Lifesaver is that the typical freight train hitting a car is roughly the equivalent of a car running over a beer can. I would NEVER condone drinking and driving, but a beer can is probably more representative of the actual protection an automobile would provide against a freight train. I have seen what a freight will do to a mid sized American car... the young lady involved got ejected from the car, flew through the air, (no seat belts) and as the Highway Patrol gently put it, "impacted the ground with such force as to cause massive head trauma." Six months later, she has had her heart stop three times in the hospital... came out of her coma and I understand she is actually learning to talk again. Her college student days are over.

The show "Real TV" did a bit with Operation Lifesaver where they mounted cameras inside a school bus and ran two locomotives through it. Pretty scary pictures.

The Army in Europe back in the 70's used to do an annual picture of M60A1 tanks rolling over a Volkswagon bug. The point was to try and get tank drivers to pay a little attention to where they were going and how they were getting there. A side effect of that picture was a reminder to the rest of us to stay the hell out of the way of tanks moving at 30 miles an hour. Perhaps Lifesaver should persuade local newspapers to run similar photos... though I haven't heard of a sane locomotive engineer who would willingly run his train through a car...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, February 26, 2004 6:58 AM
Would make a great ad campaign, except we'd have to pay Micky-D's royalties...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, February 26, 2004 6:50 AM
hmm - this is one of our more interesting topics. Rather like the logic in it, too!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:57 PM
Hi Kevin - here's the math.

If you take a 200 LB person ( I wish I was only a 200 # person) ... then the weight ratio is about 140,000 lbs of train per 1 lb of human being.

To compare, take that quarter pounder from my first example, but keep only one pickle. Slice that pickle into 13 equal parts and then stomp on that 1/13th of a pickle. Same weight ratio... 140,000 to 1.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:33 PM
I want you to do a mathematical favor for me

instead of a car, i want you to put a human in it's place...


tell me the new numbers

i know it's greusome, but, i want to know.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:07 PM
[:)]Wow! I even understood the math in this post! I have to count on my fingers to add 2+2.[:0]
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:04 PM
I like this, so much actaully, i've printed it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Getting Hit by a Train
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 25, 2004 8:59 PM
There have been several posts recently about train vs. car or train vs. pedestrian accidents. I just did some simple math (the kind I do best) and found this interesting. If you have a young (or careless) driver in your home, this might be interesting to share.


My car weighs about 9,300 times more than a Quarter Pounder (w/ cheese..in the bun.)

So, if a train hit me in my car, it would be capable of imparting similar damage as me hitting a Quarter Pounder with my car. If I hit a Quarter Pounder, I'd hardly even notice, if at all.

It would never cause me to stop and it would be obliterated. The only difference is, if a train crew hits me, they go through a lot of pain and guilt over the matter.

Take your kid out, buy a Quarter Pounder, have them watch you run it over, show them the mess that results and then explain the math.

Whew - applied physics is interesting stuff!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy