Trains.com

One more time!

1219 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Saturday, January 24, 2004 1:24 AM
[#offtopic][#oops][#offtopic][swg]
Eric
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, January 23, 2004 7:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrnut282

That's OK, I would say that everyone here learns something new along the way. NOBODY knows everything there is to know. (At least down here, anyway.)

Besides, it's fun to see how many responses it takes to get off-topic!!
I think the top one is about 2?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Friday, January 23, 2004 7:05 AM
That's OK, I would say that everyone here learns something new along the way. NOBODY knows everything there is to know. (At least down here, anyway.)

Besides, it's fun to see how many responses it takes to get off-topic!!
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, January 23, 2004 6:04 AM
See why Mookie asks questions and doesn't try to answer them!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Friday, January 23, 2004 1:09 AM
And then there were those roads that had controlls on each side of the cab so they could run each direction without the engineer twisting his back. It all started out with the Box Cab Electrics. Many had a cab on each end, but controlls in only one. "F"
[banghead]
Eric
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Ok - I get the point - guess it is a good safety feature - it is just me looking at an SD70 or a Dash 9 - it is hard to miss the front!


Remember, though, that in the early days of the road switcher/Geep, many railroads ran them long hood forward, and the controls were set up that way in the cab. Thus the F would be on the long hood end of the loco...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:53 PM
Ok - I get the point - guess it is a good safety feature - it is just me looking at an SD70 or a Dash 9 - it is hard to miss the front!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz


Mookie-
On the Suburban passenger trains I used to run on the CNW, we used a "cab car" (a passenger coach with a complete [almost] set of engineer controls in the cab). This train would operate with the cab-car leading into Chicago.

The cab-car also had an "F" on one end of the coach. So while operating from the cab-car, the front was on one end; while operating from the loco, the front was on the other end!

While doing yard moves, care had to be taken to ensure that the ground crew knew which end of the train the engineer was opeating from, lest an erroneous directional command be given.


Seems like that would be kind of important, particularly for roads like N&W and Southern which ran their Geeps "backwards", where the "front" might not be intuitively obvious.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman

The new, built or rebuilt date is on the car because its required by law.

Just like the Federal Government requires a little letter "F" on the front of every locomotive. Look on the sill right behind the front steps.

Your tax dollars at work.

Dave H.
I asked about that F awhile back - still haven't gotten over the answer - the front has to be marked! Guess I live in the land of Oz, almost, where the front of the engine always looks like the front!


Mookie-
On the Suburban passenger trains I used to run on the CNW, we used a "cab car" (a passenger coach with a complete [almost] set of engineer controls in the cab). This train would operate with the cab-car leading into Chicago.

The cab-car also had an "F" on one end of the coach. So while operating from the cab-car, the front was on one end; while operating from the loco, the front was on the other end!

While doing yard moves, care had to be taken to ensure that the ground crew knew which end of the train the engineer was opeating from, lest an erroneous directional command be given.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:18 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman

The new, built or rebuilt date is on the car because its required by law.

Just like the Federal Government requires a little letter "F" on the front of every locomotive. Look on the sill right behind the front steps.

Your tax dollars at work.

Dave H.
I asked about that F awhile back - still haven't gotten over the answer - the front has to be marked! Guess I live in the land of Oz, almost, where the front of the engine always looks like the front!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Thursday, January 22, 2004 7:54 AM
The new, built or rebuilt date is on the car because its required by law.

Just like the Federal Government requires a little letter "F" on the front of every locomotive. Look on the sill right behind the front steps.

Your tax dollars at work.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, January 22, 2004 6:08 AM
Got it! Thank you!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:35 PM
One thing not mentioned, the cars have scheduled maintainance, due on certain months and years.
The need to know the age of the car becomes apparent.
Bearing lube, althought not a major maintainance chore any more, due to sealed bearings, tank inspections, pressure valves and safety valves all are on a schedule, and must be inspected on certain dates.
That is what the consolidation stencil is for, note the dates on tank car valve test and pressure valve is noted there, as is the scheduled AAR maintainance, (the codes, A, B& E so forth ...) car inspectors look at the date built and the code to determine what has to be inspected or tested.
Center sills have to be inspected, things of that nature.
Any major repair is noted, rebuilds and such.

And, at some point in time, the car will be sold or scraped, and its value will be based partly on its age.
After all, you wouldnt buy a used automoblie unless you knew how old it was, and could see a record of maintainance.

Stay Frosty,
Ed[:D]

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:40 PM
The build dates are always there...you just have to look in the right place. They're in the Consolidated Stencil, which is a rectangular black box, divided into (usually) three parts
--two vertical parts providing bearing lubrication and brake test information, and the small line along the bottom, which provides the car's build date (and a rebuilding date, on some occasions). This box generally appears toward the right end of the car side as you're facing it. I think there's only one complete box for the multi-unit intermodal cars, but there may be other boxes for the brake information near the additional brake valves.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 389 posts
Posted by corwinda on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:22 PM
I've noticed there are no visible dates on some newer cars (especially tank cars) and most intermodal cars.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 2:56 PM
A couple of things are dependent, at leqast in part, on a car's age, including the per deim or mileage rates that can be obtained for the use of a car.

Also, freight cars have an age limit: used to be 40 years for everything in interchange service and 50 in non-interchange service...some cars types may have gotten exemptions or extensions.

As for having the date covered, it's probably available in many other places, including the Universal Machine Language Equipment Register (UMLER).

And if we freight-car historians didn't have dates to go by, how could we possibly determine "phases" of production, trends toward larger cars, etc., etc. Some of us freight-car-freaks gobble information like that up!

(Right now there's a hot competition to see who can spot the first 2004-built freight car in service...nobody's won, yet!)

BC
(reigning champion in the new-year freight car competitions)

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:42 PM
[?] Could it be that as the car changes hands, that it's easier for the acquiring company to just add it to the books under its old reporting numbers rather than try to juggle around numbers to make it fit.

I don't know if the roads use a particular set of numbers for each type of car, but if so, then there are a finite number of reporting numbers that could be used within that range. If they have acquired more cars than numbers, they may just use the previous owner's reporting numbers.

Heck, I don't know. I just like to watch the boxcars, gondolas, and the ghost of the caboose going by!
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:19 PM
Interesting...is it because a car can change hands many times and the paperwork may not? Or may get lost? Seems like they must have a very good reason for stenciling this on the car itself! And what if it is graffitied over? (graffitied?)

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: WV
  • 1,251 posts
Posted by coalminer3 on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:12 PM
Regulations say they have to be, IIRC. The dates you mentioned are in most cases the date the car was built. Other activities such as inspections, rebuilds, repaints etc. are also dated. It will give you something more to look at when your trackside.

work safe
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
One more time!
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:46 PM
Then I will be out of questions for awhile:

OPSX, SEPX, MTRX - was watching these cars go by and found that they are dated! New 7-79, 2-80, 1-80, 2-79, 11-81. Why?

Curious Me....

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy