Trains.com

Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 80

4765 views
52 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 4 posts
Posted by ardilla on Monday, November 5, 2007 12:22 PM

Me too, I voted for Mike's photo, just because I fouded it clearer in the overview.

Mike, I followed your coal photo and the video. Is it true they are different trains?

When you see the train first coming from right to left, after the two first locomotives there are 10 cars and then come the three locomotives. When the train gets toward the camera and goes back to the right, there are more than 10 cars and the second group of locomotives do n ot appear.

Thanks.

 

Luis 

ardilla1961@yahoo.com

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Sunday, November 4, 2007 4:15 PM
ERIK WINS! That shot of a train in the Rockies is AWESOME! Mike,did you purposely hold back your best photo so Erik could go out with a victory? That CN shot in flat country couldn't compare to the mountain photo.Does each of you know what photo the other is entering each week or do you keep it a secret? I am sorry to see Erik go,but I am curious to see where this contest goes from here.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Reedsburg WI (near Wisconsin Dells)
  • 3,370 posts
Posted by Noah Hofrichter on Friday, November 2, 2007 5:47 PM

I went with Erik's shot. Mike's is alright, but it looks too much like the stuff I shoot around here all the time; Erik's mountain scenery is the sort of thing I really would like to shoot.

And Erik, sad to see you go, but at least you'll still be around the forums. I look forward to seeing what the "guest photographers" can come up with too! Seems weird to think it's been 80 volumes with both of you! I can still remember clicking on the link in my Trains mag email to check out the new feature and see what the heck it was supposed to be about. Just doesn't feel that long ago....

Noah

 

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: K&A Sub MP 415.0
  • 163 posts
Posted by K&ARailfan on Friday, November 2, 2007 4:42 PM
I have to go with Erik's, you've got to love those Rocky Mountains!
The question of what CSX stands for comes up frequently on these forums, so here you go. C=Chessie S=Seaboard, X=Many More/The RR's that Chessie and Seaboard were comprised of (L&N, C&O, SCL, etc)
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 61 posts
Posted by StephenDx on Thursday, November 1, 2007 4:35 PM

One of the few times I have read ALL the replies for this competition. Everything I have read carries my sentiment as well.

As a student studying hard at present for a Bachelor of Computing Systems here in Tauranga, NZ, I do not get much time trackside Sigh [sigh] However; I have enjoyed the column in the current context and look forward to the new format. It should produce some interesting challenges for Mike.

I add my good wishes to you Erik as you move on with your responsibilities and look forward to your occasional appearance in the column in the future.

To the voting: I went with Erik's for the composition and location. That rugged mountain shows the challenges railroads have of moving freight through obstacles. Sorry Mike, yours was a little too plain and undramatic for me this time. And I have a bit of nautical blood in me alongside the iron of the rails Confused [%-)]

Roll on Trackside with Trains.com its going to be even better.

StephenDx: Computers and trains are my greatest interestsWhistling GMT +12hrs (+13 in summer)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 594 posts
Posted by Gandy Dancer on Thursday, November 1, 2007 1:24 PM

Hmmmm, what a huge difference of opinions.   I found both to be rather plain snap-shot type pictures.  The technical aspects both seem excellent.

As an earlier poster said the lake shot has a whole lot of sky, some nice flat water but for some reason it doesn't give me much of a feeling about the train, where it is, or where it is going.  Something like a ore ship out on the water or sea gulls or something.  The road on the right adds to the "wedgie" look of the whole shot.  What I really like is the plume of exhaust from the loco.  At least I know it is working and moving forward.

The Rocky Mountain shot seems to be a picture of rip-rap along the river bank that just happens to have a train on top of it.  Unfortunately moving the frame to the left to get a larger train would have lost the feeling of the depth of the valley it is climbing.  The photo does give me a feeling of train against nature.  There is also the contrast of the yellow locos against the subdued browns and very dark greens of the "nature".  I am wondering if a faster shutter speed would have given the river more of a crystaline frozen in time look.

I have to vote for Eric's Mountains.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Thursday, November 1, 2007 12:36 PM
I sure was surprised when I saw the results of the voting.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 5 posts
Posted by islandbridgejct on Thursday, November 1, 2007 8:38 AM
Good of Mike to throw the last instalment and end things on a tie.

Now, did Erik jump or was he pushed?

(Thanks for all the entertainment. I only came to the series mid-way, but I've enjoyed your banter and bickering.)
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 762 posts
Posted by kolechovski on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:47 PM

Erik's wins through having much more detail to say the least.  Although both guys have had great photos over the years, I'd have to say that Erik is the overall winner by quite a ways, though I don't know how many comptetitions he won.  Basically, the greater detail and creativity in getting the shots has had great results.  I don't know what I'll do without you guys going head to head anymore.  I'll miss this feature.  Good luck.

 

BTW, Erik and Mike still sounds much better than Mike and Erik.  I just HAD to get that out there...

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 9 posts
Posted by Stephen Clark on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:30 AM

Another two really good photos making for a difficult choice. I went with Eric's photo this week with that wonderful mountain scenery.

Steve C

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Independence, Ks
  • 15 posts
Posted by OJLAR on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:56 AM

I LIKE THE UP PICTURE AS I LIVED IN COLORADO AND LOVE THE MOUNTAINS AND THE SCENE.

YOU DO GOOD WORK AND GOOD LUCK ON YOUR NEW ADVENTURE.  HOPE TO SEE YA BACK NOW AND THEN.

Depot

Depot
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:38 AM
 mikeyuhas wrote:
 gemotor wrote:

I know, I know, swimming against the current again, but I voted for Mike's photo.  The Colorado shot was just too easy, even though the result was very appealing and calendar-worthy.

Thanks, gemotor, but expect a swift reply from Erik on that suggestion!

Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

 

Laugh [(-D]  That's good stuff. I guess we should define "too easy" before I pass judgement. One photo is a short drive from one's home; the other involved a trip to the Milwaukee airport, a two-hour flight, and a haul up into the mountains.

Clown [:o)] Bergie

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:31 AM
 HarveyK400 wrote:

Where's the step ladder when Mike needed a couple more feet of elevation for a little better perspective of Lake Winnebago to beat your butt?

Funny you mention that... I was thinking the same thing yesterday afternoon. I guess one should always keep at least a step lader in their truck for such occassions.

Bergie

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Wisconsin, land o' cows
  • 207 posts
Posted by mikeyuhas on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:19 AM
 gemotor wrote:

I know, I know, swimming against the current again, but I voted for Mike's photo.  The Colorado shot was just too easy, even though the result was very appealing and calendar-worthy.

Thanks, gemotor, but expect a swift reply from Erik on that suggestion!

Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

 

Thank you for reading Trains magazine! click here if you dare
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:12 AM
 emddd40x wrote:

Erik, were you standing in the water? or did you have a good zoom from the far bank?


Absolutely not!  Brrrrrrr... I hate the cold, let alone standing in cold water!  Smile [:)]

I was on the oposite bank. But event at that, I was only shooting at 31mm, so it didn't require the big lumber (i.e. a zoom lens).

Thanks for participating.

Erik

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 8:46 AM

Where's the step ladder when Mike needed a couple more feet of elevation for a little better perspective of Lake Winnebago to beat your butt?

At least Mike & company will carry on.  This has been an enjoyable series. 

Thanks Eric for the fine images, I wish you well in your next endeavor. 

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 36 posts
Posted by PRRK4s1361 on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:12 AM
 TOMinTN wrote:

First, and most important, I really hate to see this series (in its present form) end...but am delighted that it will continue with a different lineup behind the lenses.

I concur with the majority of what everyone says...this column will not be the same but we all wish the best for you Eric!! You both always acted like brothers in your little friendly war but the end results were always that one way or another both of you would prosper.

Now to the shots...this one has to be the most difficult to decide. Both are beautiful shots but I have always been partial to mountains (even though I do enjoy going to the shorelines in South Jersey when I get the chance). My favorite place in PA has always been the moutnains around Horseshoe Curve and the Huntingdon County area. Most of my relatives are in that area. But also there is a great chasing area right along US 22 for about a two mile stretch that is magnificent and there is the Spruce Creek Tunnels a little further west. After that the valley of the Little Juniata River is really hard to beat for scenery until you are west of Altoona. I really wish I had more time and dedication to this hobby because I have always enjoyed it since I was a 'little shaver'. With all this it menas that I went with Eric's picture for the final time. Best of luck to both of you in your futures and may the gods of sunshine glow on your pictures everytime.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:31 AM

I'm going to go against the majority here; I'm voting based on the 'difficulty factor'.

Getting a decent shot here in the dreary flatlands, on a dreary day, of a dreary railroad, is difficult to do.  Mike managed to get a very nice shot DESPITE the natural restrictions.

Not to take anything away from Erik's beautiful shot, but getting a decent shot in Colorado is almost as easy as "point-and-shoot". 

Of course, I realize that if both photos were up for sale, Erik's would outsell Mike's. 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:00 AM
 emddd40x wrote:

Hmm...Rockies vs Great Lakes.....Even though i'll be moving to the Great Lakes area in a month (Michigan), the Rocky Mountains will always have a place in my heart.  No matter what company is running a train through it.

Erik, were you standing in the water? or did you have a good zoom from the far bank?

That's actually Lake Winnebago...apparently the 6th Great Lake!  LOL!  Wink [;)]Laugh [(-D]

Dan

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Ruthven, Ia.
  • 5 posts
Posted by Mike M on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:47 AM

No sympathy vote from me...Eric's shot was great. It'll earn a spot on my computer background for a while(at work). I'd like to see it on a Xmas card also. I too have learned alot about shooting trains from you guys, but my 4 yr old grandson still takes better train pix than me.

Mike

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 14 posts
Posted by Tom Moran on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:37 AM

I hate to see that 'old gang of ours' break-up, while on the other hand, it's great that "Trackside" will continue.

Two terrific shots, as usual, but my vote goes to Erik. There's action in the mountains...rail and otherwise.

Good luck Erik. You too, Mike.

Tom M.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: San Diego
  • 39 posts
Posted by broarthur on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:14 AM

Both of you guys take such beautiful shots, I always have a hard time deciding which one to choose.  I went with Erik's shot because it was of a place I had never seen before and the back ground just blew me away.  I'm going to miss the lighthearted banter between you two but I'm glad that the articles are going to continue.  It's going to be interesting to see what the "new blood" is going to bring in.  I can hardly wait.  Erik, God speed to you and we'll be seeing you around the forum.

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 82 posts
Posted by Rocket Man on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:01 AM

Mike's shot had very good effort, but I felt the weather worked against the potential grandeur of the photo. I share the same sentiment with others that Erik's photo is calendar and/or Christmas card quality. It makes me want to go to the same spot and photograph trains. Aw heck, why not? It's only an hour or so away!Big Smile [:D]

Thanks again to both Erik and Mike for "Trackside...". Your column is welcome respite and your photography is inspiring.Bow [bow]

I look forward to the next rendition of Trackside...

 

Take care of yourself Bergie!

 

 

 

The Rock Island Line is a mighty fine line...
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Northwest Washington State
  • 58 posts
Posted by gemotor on Monday, October 29, 2007 11:05 PM

I know, I know, swimming against the current again, but I voted for Mike's photo.  The Colorado shot was just too easy, even though the result was very appealing and calendar-worthy.  I looked long and hard at Mike's shot, and the more I looked, the better I liked it.  The little bit of light under the locomotive frame, the framing of the trees on the right side, and of course the peaceful lake on the left with a bit of nautical something going on there just made it good for me.  Sure, it's a wedgie, but with green grass, trees, a lake, and a right handsome train, it's a photo I appreciate.  It would have been even better if the roadway and the partial tree trunk on the right had been cropped out, though.

Thanks, Erik, for sharing your talents with us.  This has been a most enjoyable series.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Monday, October 29, 2007 9:27 PM

I voted for Erik's shot, not due to sympathy or sorrow, but because it reminded me of the great shots the UP includes in its color calendars -- usually, as with this one, backed away more from the trains than a railfan would usually shoot.

This though Mike's shot was from an area I know and like. 

Thanks for the shots and the memories, Erik (and the kind mention in your write-up) and we hope to still see you trackside from time to time.   I'll be the last guy with Fujichrome boxes (they stopped making K200).

Remember man does not live by home improvements (or golf) alone.

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Champaign, IL
  • 185 posts
Posted by DennisHeld on Monday, October 29, 2007 9:26 PM
When I first saw the entries, I figured that Mike was 'throwing' the competition. Whereas Mike's is an ok shot, a third of it is empty sky. Some puffy cumulus clouds would have helped. But it STILL wouldn't have won!
Erik's shot was crisp with a load of detail in the rocks, the babbling stream, the snow and, oh, there was a train in the shot.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 55 posts
Posted by DICKK on Monday, October 29, 2007 8:58 PM
Sorry to see you go Erik. The contests have been great.  I voted for Erik not out of a symbolic gesture but the fact that his UP picture far outdistanced Mikes CN.  Good luck Erik and do not be a stranger.
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • 51 posts
Posted by wcnut on Monday, October 29, 2007 8:07 PM

Mike,
I want to see more shots from that location, I think it has potential... just not today.  And as homesick as I am for the Land of Cheddar, Erik's photo is the victor today.  Great shots from the both of you.

Erik,
Its been fun with your weekly amusing and insightful comments.  You and Mike make a great team and you started some very fun and interesting here on trains.com... kudos!

Thanks to the both of you,
Greg
"wcnut"

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: St. Louis Area, Florrisant to be specific!!!!!!!!!
  • 1,134 posts
Posted by bnsfkline on Monday, October 29, 2007 8:06 PM
I had to go with Erik's shot, not out of sympathy. Any shot from Colorodo will get my vote....  HOWEVER...Mike, if you could get a time machine working and got a shot of the Old D&RGW Farmington Branch in Aztec, NM, that would have been my vote!
Jim Tiroch RIP Saveria DiBlasi - My First True Love and a Great Railfanning Companion Saveria Danielle DiBlasi Feb 5th, 1986 - Nov 4th, 2008 Check em out! My photos that is: http://bnsfkline.rrpicturearchives.net and ALS2001 Productions http://www.youtube.com/ALS2001

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy