Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Why did the UP and CPR only order the SD90/43MAC and no SD80MACs?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Wow. The reports on the Chicago & North Western potential SD80MACs have a greater variation than I could have realized. <br /> <br />The production of the SD80MAC sounds almost like a game of dare. Everyone was daring everyone else to make the biggest lease or purchase in order to make the SD80MAC a regular production model. If everyone had not backed out, then it would have been a regular production model. That sounds like a paradox. <br /> <br />Then again 30 after the SD45 was produced, who would have thought another 20 cylinder engine would be used in EMD Locomotives. <br /> <br />Andrew Falconer
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy