Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
RemoteControls and Dangerous Crossings
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
What is the issue Safety or Jobs? <br />Remote Control: A battle in which we must be victorious <br /> <br />Dear Editor: <br /> <br />I've been reading with great interest the articles in the Locomotive Engineers Journal (Summer 2000, page 13) concerning the battle between the carriers and the BLE over remotely operated locomotives. I am very pleased to see the BLE taking a firm stand against their implementation into the national network of railroads. <br /> <br />I worked for a number of years with similar units at the LTV Steel mine in Hoyt Lakes, Minn. Although there was never a fatality at the mine, due to remote operation, there were numerous close calls that would curl your hair. The only reason there was never a fatality or <br />serious injury was due to the quick action by the rails involved or pure, dumb LTV luck. <br /> <br />This is a fight that needs to be won. <br /> <br />Mark A. Roue <br />BLE Division 768 <br />Thief River Falls, Minn.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy