Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
CSX vs. Amtrak 91 at Cayce, SC
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="RDG467"] The Budd cars (ex-SEPTA, nee PRR 244 & 248) were modified with crash energy management "systems", which appear consist mostly of plating over the end door openings to make the carbody more uniform.[/quote]</p> <p>The Figure 1 shows the CEM frame at the left end. The type of CEM construction is better visible in Figure 3 on page 2 of the following link: <a href="https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9504/dot_9504_DS1.pdf">https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/9504/dot_9504_DS1.pdf?</a></p> <p>[quote user="RDG467"]Conclusion was that the FEA model was very reliable in predicting the behaviour of the carbodies, although not 100% accurate in predicting where buckling would occur. [/quote]</p> <p>FEA models can only be accurate if you insert all the material weaknesses at the right location. That is almost impossible.</p> <p>Perhaps i don't understand you correctly but you can't compare the tests with accident cars. In the tests the load was applied at 4 point, 2 near the roof and 2 on the frame where the CEM frame was applied.<br />Regards, Volker</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy