Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
MM&A President Burkhardt Blaming Oil Train Engineer
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The MM&A uses the special instructions for handbrakes that are used by Canadian Pacific Ry. Since the runaway, CP has made some two-dozen changes to the handbrake section of the General Operating Instructions. The company removed a chart that gave minimum hand brake requirements for trains based on the number of cars. That chart had said a minimum of nine hand brakes were needed on a train with 72 cars.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">According to the article linked below, the CP has replaced the chart with new rules that say hand brakes must now be applied on at least 25 percent of the cars for trains parked on a slope of 1.2 percent (which is the grade of the tracks outside of Lac-Megantic); <i>unless the brakes have been properly tested.</i></span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I don’t understand what they mean by saying “unless the brakes have been properly tested.” I assume that “tested” refers to the push-pull test required by CROR Rule 112. Why would the brakes <span style="text-decoration:underline;">not</span> have been properly tested?</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">So, does that mean Rule 112 is now only an option, and if you choose to exercise it; and if it's push-pull test shows that less than 25% is satisfactory; then you are free to ignore the requirement of setting 25% and are permitted to set only the number of handbrakes required by the push-pull test?</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">And by the same token, are you free to not to exercise Rule 112 with its push-pull test if you set 25% of the handbrakes?</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">If that is the proper interpretation of what they have changed, it seems like a big change in the rule logic. It would amount to an option of using either of two different methods, and the two methods will not necessarily yield the same result. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/19/us-train-probe-idUSBRE96I0OO20130719">http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/19/us-train-probe-idUSBRE96I0OO20130719</a></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy