Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
MM&A President Burkhardt Blaming Oil Train Engineer
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">They did not need any locomotives to be running if sufficient handbrakes had been applied as required. As I understand it, the only reason to leave an engine running to pump air is to avoid the requirement and effort to perform a terminal air brake test before leaving the next day. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">However, Mr. Burkhardt seems to believe that the reason to leave an engine running is to hold the train in place by keeping air brakes applied. In the wake of the disaster, he even concludes that leaving <span style="text-decoration:underline;">two</span> engines running would be a better policy, so one engine can act as a backup. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">When the top guy demonstrates that degree of misunderstanding of train securement, it tells me that there is a good chance that something is wrong with their train securement rules. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy