Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Village evacuated after Quebec train derailment
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[quote user="schlimm"]</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[quote user="greyhounds"] I don't say that there is evidence of sabotage. But neither is there any evidence that the engineer failed to properly do his job.[/quote]</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">No "evidence" that the engineer was negligent, but the CEO of the railroad, who is in a position to know more than you or the rest of us seemed to think it likely. And no reason to believe terrorism of any sort.</span></p> <div class="text combinedtext parbase section"> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">[/quote]</span></p> </div> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Burkhardt may be in a position to know things, but he is discrediting himself by his own words. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The engineer of the train said he set sufficient hand brakes. There is no way of knowing whether that is true or false. But Burkhardt says the engineer’s claim is false because it is implausible. <em>Implausible</em> is the word he used. It means that it can not be true. If it cannot be true, it has to be false. He comes to that conclusion because the train would not have rolled if sufficient hand brakes were set. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Either Mr. Burkhardt is not intelligent enough to see the fallacy of his conclusion or he is deliberately lying in order to deceive the media and public.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Of course the engineer’s claim is <span style="text-decoration:underline;">NOT</span> implausible, as Mr. Burkhardt says. It is entirely plausible that the engineer set the hand brakes as he claims and that the hand brakes were then released by someone else for a variety of possible reasons such as tampering, sabotage, or vandalism. And until a positive cause is found, you cannot rule out any possible cause. A lack of evidence that something happened does not prove that it did not happen. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Therefore, Burkhardt’s assertion that it is implausible that the engineer applied hand brakes is bogus, and that is plainly obvious to anybody with eyes to see. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The engineer probably has no witness to back up his claim of setting handbrakes. He may be facing prison time if a jury believes Mr. Burkhardt’s bogus assertion about what is plausible. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy