Trains.com

Train runs over two women trespassing on high bridge and survive.

15342 views
91 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 2:09 PM

Ok, I will.  I have many things going thru my mind, not the least of which is that this used to be the male species doing this type of tresspass.  As a mother of a day or two, this just makes me heartsick when I see any of our young people doing this type of almost sure death stunts.

We are a society of looking for a bigger high, a bigger stunt that will thrill and shock and no limits on what we can find on video somewhere to try next.  And to paraphrase my favorite poster Kyle - let's hit them in the head with a plow and teach them not to do that.  What can I possibly say?  That is an incredibly sad statement to go along with an incredibly sad situation.

  

 

 

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,793 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 2:19 PM

Most bridges that I've seen have a narrow walkway on one side... maybe that should be mandatory. People might say that a walkway would encourage trespassing, but clearly the lack of a walkway doesn't seem to discourage it. 

We can't seem to stop people from trespassing, so perhaps we should at least provide a means of escape. The crews might appreciate a walkway also in the event of an emergency on the bridge.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,321 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:21 PM

As in so many legal issues like this, ethnicity, race, marital status, sex, hair colour and style, choices of footwear, annual earnings, disability, choice of personal automobile, choices of alimentation, presence of tattoos, education attainment, and many other attributions, preferences or predilections are irrelevant.

When it comes to handcuffs, one size fits all.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:23 PM
Hand cuffs or straight jackets? We've a hard time in this country getting this correct.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:52 PM

Thankfully the train didn't take down the bridge when it derailed.  However the fact that it did slightly derail will give the railroad more reason to sue these idiots till their broke and push for maximum jail time.  That will send a clear message to people that trespassing is illegal and dangerous.  I hope that Operation Lifesaver will use this incident to help educate the public on safety around railroads by using the media.  

A piece of chain should be hung from the bottom of locomotives to discourage idiots from laying in between the rail and having a train go over them.  I sure one idiot has probably already tried this.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:12 PM
How do you “slightly derail” a train? Isn’t that like being “slightly pregnant?”

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,866 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:16 PM

Was there only an engineer onboard?

“In this case, not only did two trespassers narrowly escape a horrible death, but had the heavy
train derailed due to the emergency brake application – which isn’t uncommon – it could have taken down the bridge, possibly killing the engineer as well."

If not, they forgot someone...

http://www.inrd.com/documents/news_releases/2014-07-29_Shuffle_Creek.pdf

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:29 PM

From all I read, the train did NOT derail (slightly or not).  It was mentioned in a public comment that putting a train into emergency braking COULD derail a train, but nowhere have I seen any mention about this train derailing at all.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,793 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:29 PM

edblysard
How do you “slightly derail” a train? Isn’t that like being “slightly pregnant?”

or slightly dead.. 

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:30 PM

There was apparently no derailment, slight or otherwise.

It seems like Kyle's chain could have hit them on the head, possibly fatally; or discouraged them from taking the one possible action that saved their lives.  Maybe we ought to forget about the chain, OK?

Tom

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:37 PM

Kyle
A piece of chain should be hung from the bottom of locomotives to discourage idiots from laying in between the rail and having a train go over them.  I sure one idiot has probably already tried this.

Says "Junior Troller" Kyle, who appears obsessed with eliminationist solutions for dealing with folks who offend his sensibilities: trespassers, cars and pedestrians at crossings, idiots, etc. 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 5:45 PM

henry6
Hand cuffs or straight jackets? We've a hard time in this country getting this correct.

How about a strait jacket?Smile

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 5:46 PM

schlimm

Kyle
A piece of chain should be hung from the bottom of locomotives to discourage idiots from laying in between the rail and having a train go over them.  I sure one idiot has probably already tried this.

Says Troller Kyle, who under various other aliases hops freights, makes threats and has gotten kicked off this forum.  If you have doubts, ask Murphy.

 Geez!  Leave me out of this.  I don't need Kyle thinking I'm a terrorist and taking pot shots at me near the railroad crossing. Laugh

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 5:49 PM

Kyle

Thankfully the train didn't take down the bridge when it derailed.  However the fact that it did slightly derail will give the railroad more reason to sue these idiots till their broke and push for maximum jail time.  That will send a clear message to people that trespassing is illegal and dangerous.  I hope that Operation Lifesaver will use this incident to help educate the public on safety around railroads by using the media.  

A piece of chain should be hung from the bottom of locomotives to discourage idiots from laying in between the rail and having a train go over them.  I sure one idiot has probably already tried this.

Did the train derail?  The account reads "Had the train derailed...."

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,954 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:15 PM

The Butler

Here is a statement released by the

Indiana Rail Road (PDF file, 55.03 KB):

Shuffle Creek Trestle

What were they doing there at 0650 - In the MORNING?  Hardly the time for 'normal' youthful indiscretions.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 7:06 PM

Semper Vaporo

From all I read, the train did NOT derail (slightly or not).  It was mentioned in a public comment that putting a train into emergency braking COULD derail a train, but nowhere have I seen any mention about this train derailing at all.

Yes, Semper, from the statement made by the head of the Indiana Railroad, the train stayed on the track, and did not lift so much as one wheel.. Mr. Hoback is not a victim of what passes for education these days but knows how to use the subjunctive mood ("had the train derailed...." states the possible result of a derailment); I am not sure but that Kyle is the victim of modern education in this respect, along with other failings. (I have the impression that the creators of some spell/grammar checking programs also know nothing of this use of the language.)

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,474 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 8:28 PM
The bridge is 80' high. I expect many people use the bridge as a shortcut from one side of the chasm to the other. No mention of how far away the nearest public crossing is located.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:05 PM

Indianapolis TV reporter says a private investigator was able to identify the women by the plate number of their getaway car. Perhaps it was a car they drove to the bridge, or perhaps they found a good Samaritan.

http://fox59.com/2014/07/29/watch-women-lie-down-on-railroad-tracks-narrowly-escape-death-as-train-bears-down/

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:32 PM

BaltACD

Deggesty

How many of us have read the comments to the news story? One was made out of pure ignorance: "Most engineers end up killing one person a year on the tracks, and many develop PTSD as a result. "

A person a year per engineer is a gross overestimation, however, for those operating over the road, the question is when, not if.

Here is another quotation from a story concerning the event: "Statistics show 908 people were killed in the United States by trespassing on railroads in 2013; 38 of those deaths were in Indiana." That certainly indicates a much lower rate than one commenter on the news story gave. Perhaps he thinks that there are very, very few engineers?

Johnny

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:37 PM

The commenter said "Most engineers end up killing one person a year on the tracks", they didn't say those killed were all trespassers, they may have been some of the thousands, in the commenter's mind, of pedestrian deaths at malfunctioning grade crossings, who we really couldn't consider trespassers.

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:50 PM

What is the lineage of that line of the Indiana Railroad?

 

Ed Burns

Retired NP-BN-BNSF

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:53 AM

edblysard
How do you “slightly derail” a train? Isn’t that like being “slightly pregnant?”

It is more like having a small accident and having a dent in your car or having a major accident and your car gets totaled.  The small derailment is just a matter of rerailing the rolling stock.  A large derailment is the train falling off the bridge and possibly bringing the bridge down.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:59 AM

Deggesty

Kyle

Thankfully the train didn't take down the bridge when it derailed.  However the fact that it did slightly derail will give the railroad more reason to sue these idiots till their broke and push for maximum jail time.  That will send a clear message to people that trespassing is illegal and dangerous.  I hope that Operation Lifesaver will use this incident to help educate the public on safety around railroads by using the media.  

A piece of chain should be hung from the bottom of locomotives to discourage idiots from laying in between the rail and having a train go over them.  I sure one idiot has probably already tried this.

Did the train derail?  The account reads "Had the train derailed...."

I apologize for my mistake, I thought it said the train had derailed, but luckily it didn't take down the bridge.  I was quickly reading.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Thursday, July 31, 2014 5:07 AM

schlimm

Kyle
A piece of chain should be hung from the bottom of locomotives to discourage idiots from laying in between the rail and having a train go over them.  I sure one idiot has probably already tried this.

Says Troller Kyle, who under various other aliases hops freights, makes threats and has gotten kicked off this forum.  If you have doubts, ask Murphy.

DELETE YOUR POST!!! I will not tolerate being called names!!!  I believe name calling is a childish and uncivilized behavior!!!  YOU ARE SPREADING LIES!!!! I have never been kicked off this forum, I have never used another account of this forum, I do not hop freights or make threats!  Why are you targeting me with your lies.

Once you delete your post, I will delete this one.  Please act civilized and stop in you childish behavior.

I believe this is the second time you he called me names.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Thursday, July 31, 2014 5:11 AM

A heavy steel chain yes. But I am talking about the lightest metal chain you can buy at a hardware store.  It would not kill anyone. Just be slightly painful and on the news it would sound deadly and discourage trespassers.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: North Carolina
  • 1,904 posts
Posted by csxns on Thursday, July 31, 2014 5:33 PM
Kyle
DELETE YOUR POST!!! I will not tolerate being called names!!!  I believe name calling is a childish and uncivilized behavior!!!  YOU ARE SPREADING LIES
Why don't you report.

Russell

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:02 PM

Maybe a half mile of penitentiary style fence in both directions would make it too long of a walk to get out onto the bridge?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:07 PM

Illinois Central (Indianapolis Southern RR + pieces of narrow gage Springfield Effingham & SE/ Bedford Springfield Owensburg & Bloomfield plus a taste of Monon  that soon soured

NP Eddie

What is the lineage of that line of the Indiana Railroad?

 

Ed Burns

Retired NP-BN-BNSF

)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:19 PM

csxns
Kyle
DELETE YOUR POST!!! I will not tolerate being called names!!!  I believe name calling is a childish and uncivilized behavior!!!  YOU ARE SPREADING LIES
Why don't you report.

I give people a chance to realize their behavior is wrong and fix it before a moderator has to get involved.  Personally I think it is better if both people can solve a problem like this.  However if they don't respond within a day, I will report their post.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:40 PM

Randy Stahl

Maybe a half mile of penitentiary style fence in both directions would make it too long of a walk to get out onto the bridge?

 There's a major railroad bridge running through our City's namesake park that sees a lot of trespassers.  I've always felt that the situation would improve if the Parks Dept. planted some strategic acres of cactus, poison ivy,  thistles and plum thickets.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy