Trains.com

Abandoned lines - what would look good on today's map?

31764 views
114 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,407 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, October 26, 2012 8:21 PM

I would like to see the Lehigh Valley line between Pittston, PA and Waverly, NY upgraded back to a thru route.  Reading Northern owns the southern segment (and the ex-LV continuing to the south), and a shortline operates the northern segment.  I was disappointed that Reading Northern didn't get control of both segments to keep the route intact.  I think NS kept trackage rights. 

NS was planning on moving Harrisburg-Buffalo traffic off the Keating Summit line to the ex-Erie southern tier line.  To get from Scranton to the southern tier, they contributed toward capacity upgrades on the D&H Clark Summit/Tunkhannock Viaduct line.  This was in spite of the fact they owned and leased the ex-LV line, which was a water level route, and shorter.  I hope they keep the route as a back-up for the D&H route (ex-DL&W) with its two 100 year old concrete viaducts.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Hilliard, Ohio
  • 1,138 posts
Posted by chatanuga on Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:18 AM

I would have loved to have seen the former B&O route through what used to be Moonville, Ohio when it was still in use.

It was hard to believe on my visit last May that it's only been 24 years since this route was taken up.

Kevin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, October 27, 2012 3:08 PM

.....As Murrary stated, I wonder about the Milwaukee's Pacific extension....I'm thinking that I've read in railroad media along the way....that route was one of the best engineered across that long stretch and mountain ranges.  Perhaps another line runing that length and direction might have benefited by adapting to it....

Item:  And Kevin, I like your photos of the B&O line across that area....Does seem a shame that route was destroyed.

Quentin

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,407 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:09 PM

I would like to see rail re-installed on the Seaboard "S" line between Petersburg, VA and Norlina, NC.  It would mainly benefit passenger rail, but I also heard that if it was rebuilt, CSX would be interested in renewed freight service along the I-85 corridor.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Chicago, IL
  • 892 posts
Posted by pbouzide on Monday, October 29, 2012 4:14 PM

I totally second the S line as a shortcut Richmond-Raleigh, mainly benefiting SE corridor passenger, but also some freight relief for CSX from the busy A line via Rocky Mount, as mentioned.

Two other candidates, mainly because of superior engineering (curvature/gradient) versus what remains:

- SP&S Spokane-Pasco

- WM Connellsville-Cumberland

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • 1 posts
Posted by capitollimited on Monday, October 29, 2012 4:14 PM

I think urban planners and the population of both LA and Chicago would like the Pacific Electric, The Chicago Aurora & Elgin as well as the Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee and their high speed lines. Some are being rebuilt at hundreds of millions of dollars and they were in place just a little over 50 years ago.

As far as freight  lines, most of the lines were redundant and most still are except for the few times a year when they needed a little extra capacity or a derailment shut one down.  I think of all of the lines that were singled tracked and now are being double tracked again (almost all of the SP Sunset line, the B&O from Chicago to near Cleveland, etc.) that are probably better examples of extinct lines that are needed back.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 42 posts
Posted by Fred Boyer on Monday, October 29, 2012 6:35 PM

In the late 50's Train Magazine had the opinion that the Kankee brancb of the New York Central would be doube tracked.  At that time it saved the NYC 1 1/2 days getting a boxcar from Steater, IL to Elkhart, IN.  With the congestion around Chicago, I'll bet NS just wishes it was still there.

Fred Boyer
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,918 posts
Posted by MP173 on Monday, October 29, 2012 8:43 PM

Fred:

NS is only running 1 daily each way from Elkhart to the BNSF at Streator.  The boxcar freight has really declined over the years.  The routing is Elkhart - CP501 to IHB to Schneider, In (where it makes a right hand turn joining the Kankakee Belt) and then to Streator.  NS has other freight on the line, primarily UP coal trains down to Wheatfield, often 2 loads and empties per day.

Intermodal doesnt really work on the line, primarily due to the tight curve at Streator coming off the Santa Fe.

It sure would be nice seeing freights rumble thru North Judson tho.

Ed

 

  • Member since
    November 2010
  • From: Birmingham AL
  • 1 posts
Posted by vonmazur on Monday, October 29, 2012 8:55 PM

Around here in B'ham, rumor is that the CSX is kicking themselves for abandoning the former SCL from B'ham to Atlanta. Supposedly there are negotiations going on with the ATN for making an arrangement to run on the existing line and restoring the east end to Atlanta. It was saved as the "Silver Meatball" Rail Trail. 

I do not know if this is really going to happen, but I do know that CSX is very unhappy with running all the freight from ATL to BHM via the current round about route thru GA....

I would like to see some of the former NYNH&H lines restored, like the Maybrook for example...

Dale in Birmingham

Rule G

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 42 posts
Posted by Fred Boyer on Monday, October 29, 2012 9:11 PM

Not so nice.  The track would run through the Hoosier Valley Railroad Musuem's repair shop.  In addition, the Knox Port Office (good luck with that) and several service stations in Wlakerton.  Rallyi a lost cause.  There has been some discussion of building a line from Wiheatfield to La Crosse, then on the the connection with NS at Thomaston, possibly with CSX at Union MIlls.

Fred Boyer
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 602 posts
Posted by Bruce Kelly on Monday, October 29, 2012 10:07 PM

The question of which abandoned lines would look good on a map today can easily prompt answers that are of virtually no use to today's railroading but would surely thrill the railfans. The NP (and later BN) climb over Lookout Pass on the ID/MT border comes to mind, with 4 percent grades and hairpin loops and large timber trestles. I suppose in the same vein, reopening Idaho's Camas Prairie line up through Lapwai Canyon, and relaying track from Lawyer's Canyon all the way to Grangeville again, would be mighty exciting. Just not very cost effective, considering how much of the area's grain haul was being trucked to barge terminals even before the line's abandonment.

But if one route could offer the best of both worlds, a place with tremendous photographic potential AND vital purpose to a Class I or regional, it would be the former SP&S between Spokane and Pasco, mentioned a few threads above. More precisely, it's the stretch between Fish Lake and the eastern outskirts of Pasco. Active and retired people from BN and BNSF, including the late Bob Downing, have told me that the abandonment of the SP&S High Line was a huge oversight, and that BNSF wishes it had that property back in service today. It would be the perfect piece to plug back into a Northwest network that hauls so much unit grain, coal, and now oil traffic toward the Pacific Coast. From South Cheney, WA, it was pretty much downhill or dead level all the way down to Pasco. Same qualities as the surviving SP&S segment which BNSF uses from Pasco west along the Columbia River.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,918 posts
Posted by MP173 on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:11 AM

Bruce:

Although not abandoned, what is the BNSF's attitude toward Montana Rail Link?  It seems as if that SHOULD be part of the BNSF map.  Was that a blunder also?  Or has it worked well?

Ed

 

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 33 posts
Posted by wmrrfan on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:29 AM

I agree with wishing the Western Maryland was still on the map between Cumberland and Connellsville.  I wish the whole WM was still intact.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:00 AM

MP173

Bruce:

Although not abandoned, what is the BNSF's attitude toward Montana Rail Link?  It seems as if that SHOULD be part of the BNSF map.  Was that a blunder also?  Or has it worked well?

Ed

MRL came into existence for a variety of reasons, both operational and legal.  At the time, the route was excess capacity for through freight, and BN was willing to spin off the local freight operations since much of it would be interchanged with BN anyway.  I believe that there were also some questions about the bonds that were secured by that line that scared BN's legal and financial staffs.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 602 posts
Posted by Bruce Kelly on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:41 AM

There was also talk about shedding the tax liability of that route at the time, costs of operating over two separate helper districts, etc. BNSF has reportedly made efforts in recent years to get MRL back, now that it's an important bridge for coal, intermodal and manifest business to/from the lower Midwest, and a vital detour route whenever the northern transcon is hampered by trackwork, derailments, snow, or floods.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,177 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:08 PM

vonmazur

Around here in B'ham, rumor is that the CSX is kicking themselves for abandoning the former SCL from B'ham to Atlanta. Supposedly there are negotiations going on with the ATN for making an arrangement to run on the existing line and restoring the east end to Atlanta. It was saved as the "Silver Meatball" Rail Trail. 

I do not know if this is really going to happen, but I do know that CSX is very unhappy with running all the freight from ATL to BHM via the current round about route thru GA....

I would like to see some of the former NYNH&H lines restored, like the Maybrook for example...

Dale in Birmingham

I think it was Ed King who described a trip on the old SAL as where the sun shone through the cab windows at all angles (due to all the curves on the line). The route was not perfect and the Trail-heads who inhabit it the ROW now advertise the 2% grade as a reason to visit. Even so, and as with former B&O mentioned already, they didn't have an adequate alternative. Part of CSX's reason to go after ConRail was the former NYC/PRR line to St. Louis to replace the abandoned B&O. That's not an option between Birmingham and Atlanta.

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 146 posts
Posted by bn13814 on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:26 PM

mudchicken
Ed: The line currently is caught in a big game of keep-away.The outfit that has it out of service goes around the other two sides of a triangle to get to its connections in PIA. The outfit that wants it has a good sized yard at Champaign and would love to access an automobile plant and interchange at Peoria that it used to have over a tenuous excursion over some branchlines that it dumped thirty years ago. Traffic patterns changed and now PIA would be access to multiple AgEnergy and shortline partners.

I don't see why Canadian National would be interested in the old P&E to reach Mitsubishi Motor Mfg. of America at Normal. Traffic flows don't favor CN anyway.

NS is the OOS Mansfield-Bloomington segment because of a fiber-optic cable that runs along this route, though two ADM Grain Co elevators at Farmer City, served by CN, reportedly desire NS to serve them.

The NS/ex-P&E Mansfield-Urbana segment serves The Andersons' Rising grain and potash terminal, Emulsicoat's asphalt terminal in Urbana and Solo Cup Company (Dart Container), also in Urbana.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 1,304 posts
Posted by Falcon48 on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:30 AM

capitollimited

I think urban planners and the population of both LA and Chicago would like the Pacific Electric, The Chicago Aurora & Elgin as well as the Chicago North Shore and Milwaukee and their high speed lines. Some are being rebuilt at hundreds of millions of dollars and they were in place just a little over 50 years ago.

As far as freight  lines, most of the lines were redundant and most still are except for the few times a year when they needed a little extra capacity or a derailment shut one down.  I think of all of the lines that were singled tracked and now are being double tracked again (almost all of the SP Sunset line, the B&O from Chicago to near Cleveland, etc.) that are probably better examples of extinct lines that are needed back.

  Well, I suppose that planners who don't have to worry about getting good value for taxpayers' dollars might wish that these systems had been retained.  But the two Chicago lines, at least, wouldn't make much sense today.  Both the North Shore and the CA&E essentially paralleled other rail commuter lines (interurbans were often built to parallel conventional railroads).  The North Shore "Shore Line" route was right next to what is now the UP-North commuter line (the two rights-of way abutted each other), and the Skokie Valley Route was between and just a short distance from two parallel commuter roads (CNW to the east and Milwaukee Road to the west).  The main stem of the CA&E (Chicago-Wheaton) closely paralleled what is now the UP West Line (CA&E was right next to it for part of the distance). CA&E's two major Fox River end points (Aurora and Elgin) were also served by conventional railroad commuter operations over more direct routes routes (CB&Q from Aurora and MILW from Elgin).  The MILW route from Elgin wasn't a full service commuter route in CA&E's day, but it is now. 

In their heyday, North Shore, and CA&E probably gave service that was at least as good as their competitors (particularly when their competitors were steam powered and non-air conditioned). But in the modern era, when commuter railroads can't be operated profitably and require government subsidies, it makes little sense to retain (and subsidize) duplicate, competing rail commuter services.

Pacific Electric is a different matter.  PE generally did not duplicate commuter services offered by conventional railroads.  Rather, PE was the major rail commuter service provider in the LA Basin.  When it expired, so did LA rail commuter service. Years later, Metrolink revived rail commuter service by instituting commuter operations on some conventional rail lines.  The PE routes which have been revived as light rail lines (though not necessarily on the original alignments) are the routes to Long Beach, Pasedena, Redondo Beach, and Culver City (with Santa Monica coming in the near future).  These lines do not duplcate other commuter rail services.    PE also had many routes that were little more than long streetcar lines, which would not be very useful today. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 433 posts
Posted by ccltrains on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 7:44 AM

The Rails to Trails program is great.  It preserves corridors should the need to lay rail would arise.  But be aware.  The bike and hike group are vicous.  Just mention that you are planning to take a bike trail and convert it back to rails and all kind of things will come out of the woodwork argueing against it.  To my knowledge no trails have been reverted to rails and i doubt if it could be politically accomplished.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,177 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:28 AM

ccltrains

The Rails to Trails program is great.  It preserves corridors should the need to lay rail would arise.  But be aware.  The bike and hike group are vicous.  Just mention that you are planning to take a bike trail and convert it back to rails and all kind of things will come out of the woodwork argueing against it.  To my knowledge no trails have been reverted to rails and i doubt if it could be politically accomplished.

It is happening... albeit slowly. http://www.centredaily.com/2012/05/22/3203995/railroad-company-gets-ok-to-reclaim.html#storylink=cpy

You are right. Even though the program is for the preservation of the rights-of-way for future use when the future does arrive several supporters are loathe to let go. They never thought the day would come. A couple of decades back a nurse who was a trail-head saw my railroadianna and voiced his support for the recent abandonment of the CSX Florida west coast sub and subsequent conversion to a trail. He could see by my body language that I was not on board and asked why. In return I asked, "What happens when we need to put the track back?" He replied, "Oh no. That will never happen. They tore out the track because they will never need it again." The lesson we learn boys and girls: Never say never.

(For the record I do not place the West Coast Sub on the list discussed in this thread. However, it would not hurt my feelings to see it back...)

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:46 AM

D.Carleton

[. They never thought the day would come. A couple of decades back a nurse who was a trail-head saw my railroadianna and voiced his support for the recent abandonment of the CSX Florida west coast sub and subsequent conversion to a trail.

 Is the west coast sub the old ACL from east of tallahassee - tampa?  would be a great fill in if ever HSR atlanta - tampa.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,177 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:09 AM

blue streak 1

D.Carleton

 They never thought the day would come. A couple of decades back a nurse who was a trail-head saw my railroadianna and voiced his support for the recent abandonment of the CSX Florida west coast sub and subsequent conversion to a trail.

 Is the west coast sub the old ACL from east of tallahassee - tampa?  would be a great fill in if ever HSR atlanta - tampa.

The West Coast Sub ran from the Dupont Sub at High Springs to the Wildwood Sub at Owensboro. The line south of Dunnellon was abandoned and removed in 1986-87.

 The "old ACL from east of tallahassee" was the Perry Cutoff from Thomasville, Georgia to Dunnellon and was lifted south of Metcalf, Georgia about the same time. The Perry Cutoff did not live up to expectations thus also does not make the "list" of viable pieces that should have been retained. (That does not mean I would not have it back...)

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 8 posts
Posted by bob811 on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 3:44 PM

Dare I add to this list, The Washington & Old Dominion right-of-way (now known as the W&OD Trail, under the auspices of the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority).  This old ROW runs from Purcellville VA to Alexandria VA, through some of the most densely built suburban development AND the heaviest and intense traffic in the mid-Atlantic region.  Oh that they could ever bring tracks back to that corridor!  What a boon to the commuting. More's the pity.     

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 4:12 PM

bob811

Dare I add to this list, The Washington & Old Dominion right-of-way (now known as the W&OD Trail, under the auspices of the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority).  This old ROW runs from Purcellville VA to Alexandria VA, through some of the most densely built suburban development AND the heaviest and intense traffic in the mid-Atlantic region.  Oh that they could ever bring tracks back to that corridor!  More's the pity.     

Talk about tortured grades and alignments....The photo in Hilton's narrow gage book comes to mind.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • 2 posts
Posted by scrappy19784 on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 7:59 PM

Junctionfan

That is true Henry6 but some lines I think were abandonned to avoid competition and customers being leeched.  Good example in my opinion is the Canada Southern Line once operated by Wabash.  In Ontario, Nanticoke (Esso Oil, Stelco Steel now I think owned by US Steel and a coal using power plant) alone could make a railroad a nice bit of revenue.  At one point in St Thomas to Simcoe I believe, all auto parts or auto manufacturing such as Formosa Frames in St Thomas, Ford Assembly in Talbotville (closed down now unfortunately), a few fertilizer and milling operations including ConAgra I believe.  Once upon a time, despite using CN trackage rights, NS used to run 4 trains from Buffalo to St Thomas every day and a couple between St Thomas and Detroit.  Other major industrial areas once upon a time was Windsor and Niagara Region particularly Port Colborne with multiple milling operations, a bio diesel plant now running, chemical plant making citric acid, steel pipe manufacturing, INCO refinery and several transloading facilities mostly all serviced by a shortline (Triliium Railways).  Besides NS or CSX purchasing the CASO to perhaps leech into CN and CP's revenues neer by, it is a very attractive intermodal route between East Coast and Chicago.  Currently anything around here in Ontario, needs to go through CN or CP and ship their containers to Toronto/Brampton for terminal loading/unloading.  NS has an intermodal yard in Buffalo (William Street) and I believe CSX built an intermodal terminal in their old defuct Seneca Yard I believe.  At one point, Dain City (between Welland and Port Colborne Ontario) had an intermodal facility.  If the CASO line was still in existence today, I wonder if NS and CSX would be leeching intermodal revenue from CN and CP as well as Dain City still being in service today.

CPR owns both ends of the caso now .the CNR ripped out the the midle but Cayuga sub had more on line traffic.Triliium Railways runs the caso through Welland  on the west side of the canal ,Mertech rail sevice runs 3.8 miles on the east side of the canal to  CNRs southern yard

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:07 PM

Falcon48

In their heyday, North Shore, and CA&E probably gave service that was at least as good as their competitors (particularly when their competitors were steam powered and non-air conditioned). But in the modern era, when commuter railroads can't be operated profitably and require government subsidies, it makes little sense to retain (and subsidize) duplicate, competing rail commuter services.

In the case of the North Shore vs. C&NW (Metra), the North Shore could have provided a more local type of service, whereas the Metra line would be used for trains from the farther north suburbs that would have little need for all of the intermediate stops.  Currently, the Metra trains run almost as close together as they can during rush hour. Don't forget, the CTA parallels the Metra line yet it has plenty of riders as well.  Of course, ridership would have to increase substantially to even begin to justify the cost.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 1,304 posts
Posted by Falcon48 on Friday, November 2, 2012 12:59 AM

IF there were a such a great demand for additiional service to justify additional trackage (a big "if), it would make far more sense to add an additional track to an existing commuter route, rather than to revive a long abandoned interurban.  You get a whole lot more bang for the buck adding by capacity to an existing corridor, and operating it together with the existing trackage by CTC as an integrated facility than you do paying a lot more to add a new, parallel stand alone line, particularly one operated by specialized equipment that could not be used on other commuter lines. 

In addtion, the dependence of North Shore and CA&E on rapid transit lines to reach downtown Chicago would put them at a huge disadvantage to conventional commuter lines today, considering how badly Chicago rapid transit service has deteriorated   Ride the Purple (Evanston) or the Red (Howard) lines as they lurch from slow zone to slow zone, and you'll see what I mean.  I rode them today, and it took over an hour to get from the Loop (State & Lake) to Foster Avenue in Evanston.  North Shore used to get all the way from the Loop to Waukegan via the Skokie Valley Route in that amount of time.   Clearly, that would be impossible today. In contrast, the conventional commuter operations in the city are faster than they used to, primarily because of the elimination of many in-city stations during the 50's and 60's.

The more fundamental point is that there is a limited amount of moneyavailable to fund public transit projects.  What makes more sense - fixing the crumbling Chicago rapid transit system, which is absolutely critical to Chicago and its economy, or creating new, subsidized commuter rail services that don't serve new territory but simply duplicate existing, subsidized commuter rail services?

      

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, November 2, 2012 10:08 AM

CA&E's connection to the Loop was broken in 1953 with expressway construction.  It probably could not have been reinstated as there was no longer a direct connection to the Loop L since the Congress line fed into the Dearborn St. subway.  The rather overrated Forest Park-Wheaton light-rail proposal was politically impossible since Dupage County would do anything to keep the CTA out.

The CNS&M Shore Line Route was abandoned in 1955, three years prior to initiation of abandonment proceedings for the rest of the system.  This would imply that North Shore had given up hope on this line even earlier.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,407 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, November 2, 2012 7:55 PM

To the list, I would like to see the north end of ex-NYC Harlem Division re-instated to Chatham as a thru route.  Not only would it expand the current passenger service, but it would have come in handy at the present time as an alternative to the storm damaged Hudson lines.

Moderator
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: London ON
  • 10,392 posts
Posted by blownout cylinder on Friday, November 2, 2012 10:59 PM

If anyone had read Ian Wilson's Steam Through Palmerston they would get the picture here...imagine the entire branchline set up both CN and CP had north of Stratford. ON Owen Sound was an active port same as Goderich and Kincardine .... many places such as Listowel, Mitchell, Palmerston and et cetera connected by a web of rail....

Any argument carried far enough will end up in Semantics--Hartz's law of rhetoric Emerald. Leemer and Southern The route of the Sceptre Express Barry

I just started my blog site...more stuff to come...

http://modeltrainswithmusic.blogspot.ca/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy