Forums

|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login or register for an acount to join our online community today!

Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 34: July 11, 2005

  • Sorry Erik, Mikes just had that little twist to it that made up my mind. One being clear and sharp. Then again Erik like Mike said if you showed the end of the tanker. Also if it was more clear. But hey theres's always next week!!!!

    Dustin
  • Wow! You guys are good. It was a tough one this week,but Mike wins this week.The colors were brighter and almost jumped off the screen.Also I liked the fact that the engine crew was visible in the cab.
    Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • None of these images really moves me - the stuff at dusk is artzy at best. My question is - why shoot at that hour when regular daylight photos are much better?

    The bottom line - those photos don't talk to me. Mike's photo was the best of the lot.
  • Difficult choice this time around. I like Erik's new location; a real difference from the usual hill. The lash-up was pretty neat, too.

    Mike's had some great color contrast. Granted, it did look a lot like one of Erik's earlier shots, with the hill and the head-on shot of the train. But I went with it anyway, maybe because of the sharper focus, but probably because I like WSOR's colors more than BNSF.
  • I too was dismayed by Erik's softness of his shot. If it wasn't the atmospheric conditions it was the fact that his lens was wide open at f5.6. A couple of stops smaller and it may have looked sharper.
    Paul
  • I liked Mike's photo the best, for the same reasons others stated. I have to admit that I was a little worried when I saw that picture of the zoo train.
  • Sorry Erik, Mike's photo was just more appealing. Great head-on shot!
  • Sorry, I have to go off on a rant here. Both of those pictures would have been rejected by www.railpictures.net because they are so darned picky. Erik's photo would be rejected because of poor cropping and its "too dark". Mike's phot would be rejected because the train is in a shadow and its "too dark". I should know. Those guys rejected my 5 best photos.

    I don't mean to discredit Erik or Mike. You photos are both awesome. I mean to discredit www.railpictures.net because they are overly picky about what they will post to their site.

    Sorry for the off topic rant.
    Shawn - MP 116 CP Watertown Sub
  • You voters have GOT to be kidding. I liked Mike's. But I LOVED Erik's.
  • i went with mikes, the entire picture is clear and crisp.
    Colin from prr.railfan.net
  • This was another tight one, but this time I went for something different than the typical pumpkin . . . so it's help calm me down as BNSF gets rid of the red and silver on the Santa Fe units . . .
    "There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Enjoy all photos from both of you. Am not a photography expert, just know what I like when I see it and have liked all photos from both. Unless you both took photos of the same scene, to me, it would be hard to judge that one was better than the other. So keep up the good work and I will continue to enjoy them all. "Doodlebug"
  • Erik's would have been better with the whole tank car shown. Mike's looked good, and I like how well the conductor was illuminated.
  • Had to go with Mike this time. I guess the thing that does it is the human interest seeing the 2 crew members.
    Larry