marknewton wrote:Mate, I live out in the donga. We get one free-to-air channel, and that's only when the wind blows the right way!
If you only get one channel, then how do you know that most TV is crap? :P
jeffrey-wimberly wrote:Does that really matter? I was active duty military as were my parents and many of my relatives. To be blunt, I don't like Ermy. The show itself isn't too bad but they could improve it immensely by replacing him.
Actually yeah it does. I really don't know, or rather didn't know, very many non-active duty personell and everyone I know thinks Emery is a trip. I guess I will chalk you up as #2 then :)
Brunton wrote: No, when my Annapolis appointment AND my four-year Air Force ROTC scholarship were rescinded because of gout,
Well sir, I applaud your Will to support your nation, even if the Way didnt pan out. I must comment that that is leaps and strides beyond what most can say!
I elected not to enlist as well (though the Navy did promise me Nuclear Power officer's school if I would enlist).
Well, as an Nuke Electrician Vet, I hereby dub thee an Honorary Nuke & Eng-Dept Friend... even if you were trying to go to the Dark Side, aka O-Ganger :)
But I have worked defense and aerospace all my life, so I have been around active duty personnel pretty much constantly. Not the same thing, I know, but I AM familiar with military hardware, and have designed my fair of it as well. For whatever that's worth.
Thats worth a lot, actually, as I too am now working the support side of the Military. A lot more goes on behind the scenes that I realized when I was active duty!
But I DO llike Emery in some things other than Mail Call. He always plays the same over-acted drill sergeant personality though, as far as I know.
Oh yeah! He's type cast and he knows it. That what makes him so fun. A viewer is not supposed to laugh with him & at his jokes, one is supposed to laugh AT him because he is so unreal.
spidge wrote: Wow, what is the topic here? Srayed a bit didn't we. Thats ok.I must say that after resizing my pics I get through some of my threads on other sites a bit quicker and the picks are't soooo big. I'm sure this was keeping may people from looking and reading my threads.
Wow, what is the topic here? Srayed a bit didn't we. Thats ok.
I must say that after resizing my pics I get through some of my threads on other sites a bit quicker and the picks are't soooo big.
I'm sure this was keeping may people from looking and reading my threads.
I love how a conversation can flow from one topic to another so seamlessly :) always interesting to see where the thread ends up!
But even those of us with broadband appriciate a fast loading thread!
Dave Loman
My site: The Rusty Spike
"It's a penny for your thoughts, but you have to put your 2 cents in.... hey, someone's making a penny!"
John
claymore1977 wrote:To each their own, but WOW, you have to be the FIRST person I have ever met that thinks Emery is annoying. It might be that I have been surrounded by military my whole life. Where you ever active duty?
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
claymore1977 wrote: It might be that I have been surrounded by military my whole life. Where you ever active duty?
It might be that I have been surrounded by military my whole life. Where you ever active duty?
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
Brunton wrote: claymore1977 wrote: Obviously neither of you have seen Mail Call hosted by R. Lee Emery on the history channel. Quite a gem of a program, but still not enough to outwieght the literal ton of crud on all the other channels. I've seen it. The man is the very definition of annoying (perhaps that's just his on-screen persona), and as for the show itself - the commercials are the best part! If that's considered a gem, then a horse apple necklace must be absolutely priceless!
claymore1977 wrote: Obviously neither of you have seen Mail Call hosted by R. Lee Emery on the history channel. Quite a gem of a program, but still not enough to outwieght the literal ton of crud on all the other channels.
To each their own, but WOW, you have to be the FIRST person I have ever met that thinks Emery is annoying. It might be that I have been surrounded by military my whole life. Where you ever active duty?
marknewton wrote: james saunders wrote:Mark, SNL is on Foxtel... on the comedy Channel...OK. I'll revise that statement - SNL has never been broadcast on free-to-air television. As for Foxtel, Citizen Rupert has quite enough money already. He's not getting any of mine. (At any rate, where I live we're lucky to get the ABC*!)Cop you later,Mark.*Australian Broadcasting Corporation. At 8 cents a day, it's overpriced.
james saunders wrote:Mark, SNL is on Foxtel... on the comedy Channel...
Mark, SNL is on Foxtel... on the comedy Channel...
Just thought i'd point it out... I only got foxtel for the comprehensive sports coverage, and the doco's...
James, Brisbane Australia
Modelling AT&SF in the 90s
marknewton wrote: claymore1977 wrote: Obviously neither of you have seen Mail Call hosted by R. Lee Emery on the history channel. Quite a gem of a program, but still not enough to outwieght the literal ton of crud on all the other channels.Mate, I live out in the donga. We get one free-to-air channel, and that's only when the wind blows the right way!Cheers,Mark.
Obviously neither of you have seen Mail Call hosted by R. Lee Emery on the history channel. Quite a gem of a program, but still not enough to outwieght the literal ton of crud on all the other channels.
claymore1977 wrote:Obviously neither of you have seen Mail Call hosted by R. Lee Emery on the history channel. Quite a gem of a program, but still not enough to outwieght the literal ton of crud on all the other channels.
Brunton wrote: marknewton wrote:"... we seem to get all the other rubbish US television programmes here.Cheers,Mark.Unfortunately, we get it all in America, too! We have Directv satellite, about 100 channels, and it is amazing how often there is nothing of interest on ANY of them!
marknewton wrote:"... we seem to get all the other rubbish US television programmes here.Cheers,Mark.
Anyone interested in 250 disks of Commodore games and programs and a couple of 64's and a 128, all in operating condition? (I still have the printer cass drive etc.) I hauled it all out a couple of years ago and we had a lot fun playing the old games with the primitive graphics!
I still use the 13" video monitors, one's in the train room and the other is in use at my A/V workbench. They've out lasted all my other TVs and monitors!
BTW I've seen plenty of low budget rubbish Australian TV too! Every country is guilty of producing plenty of crap tv.
Jay
C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1
Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums
marknewton wrote: jeffrey-wimberly wrote:SNL = Saturday Night Live. It's only beem around for like 4 or 5 decades.It's, like, never been broadcast in Australia*, so the reference is meaningless to me. *Which is surprising, since we seem to get all the other rubbish US television programmes here.Cheers,Mark.
jeffrey-wimberly wrote:SNL = Saturday Night Live. It's only beem around for like 4 or 5 decades.
Mark, SNL is on Foxtel... on the comedy Channel... I watch it sometimes
I don't mind the original CSI... and Law and Order...other than that... CSI Miami is gold for the Caruso factor.
James
cordon wrote:I was hoping someone would get around to mentioning the Commodore computers. ... Before the Commodore Vic-20 and the Commodore 64 there were the Commodore PET, plus the KAYPRO portable and the Grid portable. Other people have already mentioned HP, Osborne, and the Radio Shack TRS-80. Around that same time (early '80s) Atari sold a home computer and Coleco sold one called Adam.
Around 1986 IBM started selling hard disks for their PC, and they made the PC boot automatically from the hard disk. No more inserting a floppy to boot up. IMHO, that made IBM PCs more desirable than all the competition.
A few people have told me they absolutely love their MACs, and I intend to buy one someday.
I forgot about the Coleco Adam. Wasn't that supposed to be an add on for their game console?
The first drag race game I played was on the Commodore. (orange mono color sprite graphics)
There are some subtleties to image file sizes. You can, with most photo software editors, do these things to affect/change file sizes:
a. Crop your picture, which does not change resolution or sharpness.
b. Change its size without cropping, which reduces resolution if you are making it smaller. If you make it bigger, you will not get better resolution.
c. Change the file type with which you save the image, if it starts out as a BMP or GIF. BMP and GIF store every pixel in your image. BMP is uncompressed, and GIF is compressed with a lossless data compression scheme with respect to the number of pixels. However, the GIF scheme, at least with the software I have, reduces the color palette to 256 colors. JPG, OTOH, is a lossy data compression scheme. That is, when you save an image as a JPG, you usually lose some resolution with respect to pixels, but it can save (about) 16 million colors. Most software enables you to select the level of compression that the JPG scheme uses.
1. Here's where it gets interesting. With JPG you can keep the same picture size and increase the level of compression, which will decrease the file size and decrease the quality of the picture somewhat. Or you can decrease the picture size and keep the same level of compression and get a smaller file size. Or you can do both to get the smallest file size.
2. With a higher level of compression you will get artificial lines and circles around sharp edges and dots in your picture. We call these artifacts.
There are many more image file schemes, but I don't know much about them and I don't want this to get too long. These are just the basics.
Personally, I use GIF for photos that are already small, and for line drawings. I use JPG for larger photos at about 30 percent compression.
Now, comments on old computers:
I was hoping someone would get around to mentioning the Commodore computers. Sometimes they get no mention at all, yet they have a very important position in the history of home computers.
Before the Commodore Vic-20 and the Commodore 64 there were the Commodore PET, plus the KAYPRO portable and the Grid portable. These last two were mainly business machines. Other people have already mentioned HP, Osborne, and the Radio Shack TRS-80. Around that same time (early '80s) Atari sold a home computer and Coleco sold one called Adam.
The Commodore 64, the Apple, and the Atari were somewhat similar. Many people who write about early computers neglect to mention that for many years there were many more Commodore 64s than any other make or type of personal computer. They spread worldwide, even into the Soviet Union. Indeed, I believe Russian programmers first wrote Tetris on a Commodore 64. The IBM PC was catching up very slowly during the early '80s.
Commodore came out with the Amiga, which had amazing graphics and music capabilities, which artists used into the late '90s. Apple also persisted and held on to a significant percentage of the market.
Amigas have pretty much fallen by the wayside, but Apple is still with us.
SteamFreak wrote:Didn't anybody own a Vic 20? I got one of them in '82, but pined for a Commodore 64.
Had a 64 with the tape recorder drive. (ever try playing one of those in an audio cassette?)
Upgraded to a Commador 128 with (get this) DUAL FLOPPY DRIVES!
Nelson
Ex-Southern 385 Being Hoisted
claymore1977 wrote:Brunton: I do believe that the issue is the bandwidth, not storage. I think the OP of this thread was talking about how painful it is to get medium to high res images over dialup. I do not believe that anyone asked to have people perminently downsample the pictures, but rather do what you are already doing and have a thumbnail that is also a link to the high res version of the image. People are just asking to have the thumbnail/link posted versus the full res version, this way, the thread just loads the thumbnails, those with dial up can surf at a reasonable speed, AND they can click to look at the High Res version if they choose.
I do believe that the issue is the bandwidth, not storage. I think the OP of this thread was talking about how painful it is to get medium to high res images over dialup. I do not believe that anyone asked to have people perminently downsample the pictures, but rather do what you are already doing and have a thumbnail that is also a link to the high res version of the image. People are just asking to have the thumbnail/link posted versus the full res version, this way, the thread just loads the thumbnails, those with dial up can surf at a reasonable speed, AND they can click to look at the High Res version if they choose.
Regarding early PCs: My Trash-80 Model I, with 4k RAM and 4k ROM (the BASIC interpreter) was built in November 1977. It is serial number 2525. The TRS-80 came out about six months after the Apple I.
galaxy wrote: jeffrey-wimberly wrote: As for the first personal computers not being available until 1981, wrong! Apple introduced the Apple II in 1977.Apple, however, unlike Beta, still exists. Also unlike VHS...almost LOL. What may have been available at anytime may not have been commercially feasible, affordable or available to all.
jeffrey-wimberly wrote: As for the first personal computers not being available until 1981, wrong! Apple introduced the Apple II in 1977.
One can not compare Apple to Beta, one would have to compare Apple to Sony which also still exists. It is not a good analogy. The technology used in the Apple II is much more obsolete than the BetaMax which is still used in professional video.
loathar wrote:Jeffrey- Did you forget about the Radio Shack TRS-80? We had those at school in 80 but the Apple II weren't available at our school until 82. Even then it was just an over blown type writer. (not every one can write code). When did anyone make any practicle software for the thing? 86? 87?