Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Defend the Big Boy!

1195 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 31, 2003 2:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dougal

I thought you guys would like to know that the Big Boy number series is occupied by SD70Ms so UP can't restore a 4000.

Scrap the Big Boys, Scrap the Challengers, BUY MORE DIESELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just kidding.
It's a good think you were just kidding......[|(][:(!][V][:P]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 31, 2003 2:32 PM
I thought you guys would like to know that the Big Boy number series is occupied by SD70Ms so UP can't restore a 4000.

Scrap the Big Boys, Scrap the Challengers, BUY MORE DIESELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just kidding.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:01 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mustanggt

Besides Deisels rule ; }
Hey, watch yourself!!!! [;)][:D][:)][:p][:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 5:10 PM
I was given a Rivarossa 'Big Boy' for my birthday. I love it. It is too big for my layout. But I do love it.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 664 posts
Posted by mustanggt on Sunday, December 14, 2003 3:32 PM
Who cares. there both good. Besides Deisels rule ; }
C280 rollin'
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:13 AM
The following is a quote from the "Those are fighting words" discussion group posted by HighIron2003ra

"I am going to say that there are many good points for both engines. However I post a link here to help look at it from the Alley's point of view. It will save having a mass of large sheets on this forum.

http://www.steamlocomotive.com/allegheny/"

Thanks HighIron

Your the Man!!!

Gee whiz only six posts in two days, Me thinks someone is running out of steam!

In all seriousness thank goodness for diversity, without it, life would be boring[|)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 13, 2003 11:24 AM
Daniel,

aparently you missed this thread: http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=9621

Although it is not as indepth as the 2 on the Atlas forum's at the moment, it does point that UP is trying to screw you out of more money.

Jay
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 13, 2003 10:44 AM
QUOTE: An Allegheny, **cringe** is a 2-6-6-6 mallet type loco.


Dear 4884bigboy,
Just one little thing: the Allegheny type locomotives were all simple. You may be thinking of some of the N&W's superior mallets[:)][:D][8D][^].

Dear Big_Boy_4005,
Yes, I am talking to you[;)]. Allegheny is a type of wheel arangement, 2-6-6-6, that was owned by the C&O and the Virginian. Furthermore, the two railroads' Allegheny type locomotives were practically identical. The Allegheny locomotives had some dimensions by which the supporters of Allegheny superiority say they were larger. However, our beloved Big Boys have many more attributes which make them the largest locomotives of all time. I just wrote a large posting at the "Big Boy vs. Allegheny"; those are fighting words thread.

Dear NTDM,
What the heck are you talking about?[?]

Defend the Big Boy,
Daniel
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 13, 2003 9:42 AM
So you support UP in their latest endevouurs to raise the cost of the big boy by 10%?

Jay
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:35 AM
An Allegheny, **cringe** is a 2-6-6-6 mallet type loco. Like I said earlier, they were used in low speed coal drags on the C&O. By reading all the other posts in that thread, I must clearly say that BIG BOY'S RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A true UP fan would think so!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, December 13, 2003 1:57 AM
You talkin to me? I said, are you talkin to me?

What the hell is an Allegheny anyway? Never heard of it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Defend the Big Boy!
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 13, 2003 12:30 AM
To all Union Pacific fans, people with Big Boy in their screen names, and anyone else who cares about our beloved 4-8-8-4s:

Go out and defend the honor of the Big Boy on the "Big Boy vs. Allegheny"; those are fighting words thread. I just posted a massive post there. Go out and help me and others support the true largest locomotive of all time.

Go!!!

-Daniel

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!