Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Substitutes for Floquil thinner?

20563 views
34 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: Sumner, WA
  • 242 posts
Posted by MRRSparky on Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:24 AM

I have read that the fumes from these types of thinners are dangerous to our health.  Now I'm wondering, in the small quantities and bried exposures we experience in mixing paints, thinning them and cleaning brushes (air or otherwise), what is the risk?  What health consequences are there?

I know the MR magazine always makes the point to use this stuff in well ventilated areas, etc. but I am assuming that is to protect themselves from product liability.

Does anyone have accurate information as to exposure levels, length of exposure, health consequences, etc.?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,439 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Saturday, March 15, 2008 9:58 AM

Hi,

I doubt if anyone would really answer that question for fear of liability.   I do know this, that when I am brush painting in my hobby room (ex bedroom, climate controlled) and leave the room and return, the odor is obvious.  I try to keep my jars - especially thinner - covered as much as I can when using them. 

One thing I will not do is spray - either can or airbrush - unless I am in the garage with front/back doors open to the outside.  One exception was when I sprayed flat white "overspray" on the layout backdrop and I used a solvent approved mask at that time.

I guess the best advice here is to use common sense!

Mobilman44

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 138 posts
Posted by cregil on Saturday, March 15, 2008 11:00 AM
 ScottGroff wrote:

I have read that the fumes from these types of thinners are dangerous to our health.  Now I'm wondering, in the small quantities and bried exposures we experience in mixing paints, thinning them and cleaning brushes (air or otherwise), what is the risk?  What health consequences are there?

 

We need to add latex gloves to our list of safety equipment.

A couple of woodworking acquaintances of mine have had health problems which their doctors said the tests indicate are the result of a long term build-up of toxins from decades of exposure to solvents. 

One buddy explained to me that oils in certain exotic woods as well as chemicals in paints, stains, strippers, rust removers/inhibiters (that we use on our machine tables) that can, individually, be culprits and that, in his case, it was absorption through the skin rather than inhalation of fumes that brought about the build-up.

Switching from enamels to acrylics is something I am seriously considering.  In woodworking, I mix my own stains using alcohol diluted dies and, almost exclusively, use shellac as my top coat (also alcohol based)--alcohol is just so much safer than the rest.  I wouldn’t mind being able to get rid of everything else.

Crews

Signature line? Hmm... must think of something appropriate...
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Saturday, March 15, 2008 3:20 PM
 ScottGroff wrote:

I have read that the fumes from these types of thinners are dangerous to our health.  Now I'm wondering, in the small quantities and bried exposures we experience in mixing paints, thinning them and cleaning brushes (air or otherwise), what is the risk?  What health consequences are there?

I know the MR magazine always makes the point to use this stuff in well ventilated areas, etc. but I am assuming that is to protect themselves from product liability.

Does anyone have accurate information as to exposure levels, length of exposure, health consequences, etc.?

Any company manufacturing and marketing a hazardous material takes on this type liability, and is also required by federal law to publish and distribute an MSDS on that product.

Directly form the Testors published MSDS for Dio-Sol, Section IX Special Protection Information:

Respiratory Protection: If exposure exceeds occupational exposure limits (50 ppm for the Light Aromatic Hydrocarbon from Section II) use a NIOSH-approved respirator to prevent overexposure. In accord with 29 CFR 1910.134 use either an atsmophere-supplying respirator or an air purifying respirator with appropriate chemical/mechanical filters.

Ventilation: If the product is used in a confined area, provide sufficient Mechanical (general and/or local exhaust) ventilation to maintain exposure below TLV(s). Heavy solvent vapors should be removed from the lower levels of area, and all ignition sources should be eliminated.

Protective gloves: Solvent resistant gloves are recommended for prolonged contact.

 

Personal note: when using any model paints, which I normally do in my basement, I have a home made vent booth that hooks up to the dryer duct that is vented outside. I also wear an air purifying respirator, as well as nitrile gloves, during mixing and spraying of the paint.

Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Saturday, March 15, 2008 4:17 PM
 ScottGroff wrote:

I have read that the fumes from these types of thinners are dangerous to our health.  Now I'm wondering, in the small quantities and bried exposures we experience in mixing paints, thinning them and cleaning brushes (air or otherwise), what is the risk?  What health consequences are there?

I know the MR magazine always makes the point to use this stuff in well ventilated areas, etc. but I am assuming that is to protect themselves from product liability.

Does anyone have accurate information as to exposure levels, length of exposure, health consequences, etc.?

Those who have been in the hobby for a while should recall the disturbing letter to the editor in MR perhaps 15 years ago, from a gentlemen who indicated he had been a custom painter of railroad models. At the time, according to his doctors, he was dying of acute toxic exposure to certain of the chemicals in the old Floquil paints/thinner. MR made quite a deal about this at the time. As I recall, it wasn't too long after that that Floquil changed their formulae (I think they've done it again since, as well) but it still remained generally hazardous to your health. Severe nerve damage was one of the potential effects of the old stuff. I'm not sure just what the warning labels read today.

Now I'm pretty sure that an occasion few wiffs of the vapors aren't going to doom you but if you do any indoor work, or paint a lot of models, I'd be v-e-r-y careful, even with the new, improved stuff and be sure to wear both gloves and an appropriate respirator. Most hazardous chemicals generally become toxic only after excessive exposure but individual sensitivity can vary a great deal. I'd say be particularly cautious if you have any known sensitivity of certain chemicals/products, or any odd allergies. 

CNJ831

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!