Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Walther's Passenger Car Questions.. I'm Stumped

2046 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Scottsdale, AZ
  • 723 posts
Posted by BigRusty on Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:01 PM

Hi John.

I bought 8 of the Walthers' Budd 85' Parlor Lounge cars the prototype for which that Amtrak got from the Pennsy's Congressional and Senator consists.  They weigh 5 1/2 ounces on very free rolling trucks.

I don't have any track to run them on, my garage layout in planning has 30 inch Min R curves, but the biggest problem that I can see for smaller radius operation is in the trucks themselves. As constructed they have a return in the top that represents part of the cross frame of the prototype truck. This impinges on the center sill limiting the amount that the truck can turn.

Simply nipping these off flush with the back of the side frame would allow operation on smaller radius curves, but of course, with a lot of overhang.

These cars came with body mount couplers, and in your case I recommend the talgo type truck to allow coupling on curves and less chance of derailing. I would never use body mount couplers on any car over a scale 70 feet long with less than 30 inch radius curves.

Modeling the New Haven Railroad in the transition era
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Wayne County Michigan
  • 678 posts
Posted by dale8chevyss on Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:23 PM

Yes that does help in my buying decision.  Thanks a million!  I have 18 and 22 radii and I hardly doubt they would go on the 18 all that much but it does help to know.  I have managed to secure a 1930s smoothside car by Rivarrossi and thta looks silly on the 18 but it does manage it; the reason for not knowing if the Spectrum cars would work is that the Rivarrossi car that I have the coupler is mounted directly to the trucks, not a swinging coupler mount like you are mentioning on the Spectrum cars.

What road name(s) do you have?  I'm looking at the Norfolk and Western ones to go with my J Class 4 8 4.

Thanks!

 

Daniel 

Modeling the N&W freelanced at the height of their steam era in HO.

 Daniel G.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:25 AM

Hi,

I model the ATSF with an IC interchange.  I have quite a few Walthers and Bachmann Spectrum passenger cars, and they look and run just fine.  They are "scale length", and give a nice impression going down the tracks.

Before I got them, I put together a 15 car set of Athearn heavyweights and painted/decaled them for the ATSF, and changed out couplers and did some very light weathering.  And while the olive colored cars are boring to some, and short in length to others, I find that I actually prefer running them over the much more expensive and "correct" cars mentioned above.  

I think that the size of the layout is a major factor in this.  My 15x11 is certainly not small, but a 12 car train of Walthers/Spectrum cars covers almost 1/3 of the main.  If my layout were smaller, I would not keep the larger cars, and just put together a nice set of Athearns......

For what its worth........

Mobilman44  

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:18 AM
 dale8chevyss wrote:

I also have a 4X8 with 22 radius and am looking at a Spectrum set (HO).  Do you have any problems with those or have heard of any problems with those negotiating the turns?

I can't seem to find anyone to answer this question.


Daniel

I bought a large fleet of Spectrum coaches for my commuter fleet. The couplers are junk. Its a nice idea to have body mounted couplers that swing with the trucks, but the stock couplers sag terribly and a lot of vertical uncoupling was the result. I replaced all of them and eliminated the problem. I was able to do this because my minimum radius is 32". I'm not sure what you could get away with if you have smaller radii.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:12 AM
I've bought a number of them, both streamlined and heavyweight, and most run fine. I do have a problem with one solarium/obs that wants to derail at the same curve and I have been unable to figure out why so for now, it has been parked in the coach yard. I've read of similar problems others have had. The Walthers cars look great but given their price tag, they should be more reliable runners. There is always going to be an occasional lemon in any product line, but there seems to be too high a percentage of these in the Walthers line.  
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:37 AM

I think there's a difference between a "fixer upper" and needing to tweak a few things to get a car to run right on your layout. I suspect you could have gotten the car to work by trying a few things as suggested above, but if you don't want to do it that's understandable. My Walthers Superliners work fine on 28" radius curves, but I'm not sure how well they'd do on tighter curves, despite Walther's claims about 24" min. radius.

BTW if you got the car because you model the Santa Fe, Athearn heavyweights are based on ATSF prototypes. Their RPO, Baggage and Coach cars are full length for their prototypes, and will take very sharp curves since they have truck-mounted couplers.

Stix
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:16 AM

To the OP,

Walthers does make nice passenger cars so you might just ask for your LHS to send it back and replace it with another.

Regarding passenger cars and curves.  Yes, if I were building a small layout in the neighborhood of 4x8, I would increase the size nominally and make my minium curves 24 and 26.5 inches so I could accomodate most of the stuff out there.  My past two layouts were a garage layout (16x19 feet with 30-inch miniumum mainline curves) and a basement layout (14x25 feet with minimum 32-inch mainline curves).  At that time I had a brass California Zephyr and some of the cars would not even negotiate the 32-inch curves but needed about 34-inches or more.  This was due to the full length side skirts etc.  I think after shimming up the trucks with a KD washer slightly, they would all barely do 32-inch curves.  I have them on consignment to sell now since I have the BLI CZ plastic cars - which some how will run on 24-inch curves depsite the full length side sills.

I think Don's comment that we need 44-inch curves is well, an ideal world.  Very few home layouts can do that but most medium or larger home layouts can run at least 28-inch curves and most a bit larger as minimums.  I think all our 85 and 89 foot long cars will handle a 30-inch curve just fine.  They may not look as nice as we would like but they should run fine.  I recall on my garage layout, there was a 36-inch curve and my 89' auto racks still looked funny on that curve.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 134 posts
Posted by SunsetLimited on Thursday, October 25, 2007 8:06 AM
I have lots of walthers budds and they all make it around 22" radius with no problems or modifications, all has to do with track work.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: New Milford, Ct
  • 3,232 posts
Posted by GMTRacing on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:31 PM

Daniel,

    I have about a dozen of the Spectrum coaches and they work just fine on tighter radius turns right down to 18" (though they look mighty silly hanging off of them). They have an articulated coupler pocket that allows them extra angularity when swiveling. Hope that helps. J.R.

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Wayne County Michigan
  • 678 posts
Posted by dale8chevyss on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 8:46 PM

I also have a 4X8 with 22 radius and am looking at a Spectrum set (HO).  Do you have any problems with those or have heard of any problems with those negotiating the turns?

I can't seem to find anyone to answer this question.


Daniel

Modeling the N&W freelanced at the height of their steam era in HO.

 Daniel G.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Monday, January 29, 2007 9:23 PM

Big John--

I was just about to ask the question about your track radius, when you answered it in the previous post.  The Walther's cars should take a minimum 24" radius (squeaking through) and a 27-28" with no problem.  It sounds as if you had a car that had a badly seated truck.  Usually, a small brass shim will take care of the problem.  I say brass, in case you were thinking of installing lighting in the car. 

I've got a fairly good collection of Walther's passenger cars (mostly the Pullman-Standard) and I have found that several of them had derailment problems, which were usually do to one of two problems:  1) wheels out of gauge or 2) mis-aligned or too tight trucks.  These were pretty easily taken care of, and my minimum radius is 34". 

I'd say that you originally got a 'problem' car, but actually, the solution is fairly easy.  Loosen the truck and check the wheel guage.  That can usually be solved by a simple twist of the wheel on the axle.  Right now, all of my Walther's cars work very well. 

But one thing to remember, their reccomendation of 24" minimum radius is an ABSOLUTE minimum.  That means 'crawling' the train through. 

Hope this doesn't deter you from getting any additional Walther's cars--they're pretty darned good, and they look terrific running on the layout.

Tom  

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Monday, January 29, 2007 8:08 PM

Did I give up on it???   You betcha. No way I was putting a BRAND new 40 dollar car on the fixer-upper shelf.  Shelf is full anyways.  Wink [;)]

Well, in my defense, I bought the car 2 weeks ago and brought home, pulled it out of the box and pushed along the rail.....   then went to bed.  I told myself that I would run it on my next day off.   2 WEEKS later, I finally got a day off and ran it.   Never went around the layout.  After 3 derails, I pulled it up, looked at it. Saw what was wrong and tried a "gentle love fix".  (pulling up the body).  Nothing there... Saw that it would take serious work to fix. I just spent 40 bucks on a car, I wasnt about to start cuttin', tweakin' or fidgeing with it on something that I knew was defective. 

 So, back I went and got 3 new box cars instead.   It helps that my favorite train store is less than 2 miles away.  Big Smile [:D]

And just so folks know, I was well aware of the 24"Shy [8)] radius thing.  My smallest R is 24" with an average of around 27-28"

After reading everyone's replies, I am chalking it up to an unlucky buy.

 

Crandell....  GLad you like the pic.   One of my finer moments I assure you  Clown [:o)]

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, January 29, 2007 7:47 PM
Too bad nobody makes articulated 80'ers.  That'd take care of all our problems. Clown [:o)]
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 3,864 posts
Posted by Don Gibson on Monday, January 29, 2007 7:14 PM

HARD to tell in your specific case, but MOST of Walthers passenger car problems have been from too tight a radius.

Building a Full length passenger car designed for a prototypical 72" + curves should have 36" - 44"r  to run right, and has trouble on lesser curves. There's only so much jockying a model builder can do.

In Wathers' top quality cars, that means over 24", - but try 44".

WALTHERS, in their ads states a minimum radius of 24"r. That means 'stay on the track'. Old timers used to use 36"r, for their minimums. I preferr 44".

ANY full length CAR to run on our in-home curves needs to cheat somewhere. IHC and RIVAROSSI use  truck-mounted (Talgo) couplers and undersized (31") wheels. WALTHERS has not gone this route.

My current layout (new) has a 27" mainline curves and # 6 single crossovers. (I'd rather have 44"), but my Walthers cars go throught with KD #5 couplers.

BEST ANSWER is to use more prototypical curves with more prototypical cars - or buy ATHEARN or other SHORTY'S to fit your curves. They'll run better. WHEN you line up the ATHEARN heavyweight next to the Walthers you'll see the difference a buck can make.

They'll look just fine sitting at the Passenger Station.

Passenger Don

Don Gibson .............. ________ _______ I I__()____||__| ||||| I / I ((|__|----------| | |||||||||| I ______ I // o--O O O O-----o o OO-------OO ###########################
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Monday, January 29, 2007 6:19 PM

I just noted that someone else made a post in this thread in regards to weight. The Walthers cars are a little on the light side. I can't remember who, but someone is making weight upgrade kits for the Walthers cars. It would most certainly be cheaper to add weight by other means, but I haven't seen one of these weights first hand, so I don't know if they are worth the expense or not. Great cars nonetheless!!

Smitty
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Kentucky
  • 10,660 posts
Posted by Heartland Division CB&Q on Monday, January 29, 2007 6:09 PM

You mentioned rubbing at bottom of car.  Trucks can pivot into underbody details on small radius curves. My good friend trimmed the center sill to clear trucks for his 24" curves. 

Someone mentioned Rapido cars.  I have two and they were derailing.  Wheels were out of guage.  I corrected the wheels and also added a little weight at the cars' ends.  No troubles since.

GARRY

HEARTLAND DIVISION, CB&Q RR

EVERYWHERE LOST; WE HUSTLE OUR CABOOSE FOR YOU

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, January 29, 2007 6:06 PM

John, are you saying you have given up on correcting this matter?  Is it not an easy fix?  I have three Walthers heavies, and the only thing that I have found is that some of the trucks look like they are not sitting parallel to the rails.  In fact, they are, but the outer side-frame plastic add-on, whatever it is meant to be on the sleepers, was applied crooked.

I have found the heavies, my only experience, to be hard to drag up my 3% grades, even with a Niagara.  I suspect that it is because the journals are dry, but also that the electrical pickups are placing a lot of drag on the axles, maybe as much as 1/8 oz per car.

So, can you not pry up the body on the low end and see if you can insert any tabs in their proper places?

P.S. - I still luuuuuv that photo!

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Monday, January 29, 2007 5:38 PM

Thanks for the input guys.   I did some reading and everyone seems to be happy with theirs.  I read the "Super Cheif" thread and sat here wondering if it was just me and bad luck.

For the record, it did this right out of the of the box.  What it appeared was the "body" was too low on the frame.  the other truck, even though it was close, didnt hang up like this one did.

I consider it fate maybe trying to tell me I need to save my pennies and get the Rapido cars.

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: northern nj
  • 2,477 posts
Posted by lvanhen on Monday, January 29, 2007 4:31 PM
I have 8 or 9 Walthrs cars - the only problem is my 4x8 - I've had to modify the trucks & center sill to negotiate the less than 24" radius curves.  Once modified, they are as good or better than my Bachmann Spectrum.  The only better car I have is my new Rapido - only changed the coupler (new one included w car) to negotiate sharp curves - detail better - lighting great as it is battery powered so no flickering!  Price considered - the Walthers deserves an "A" rating!Cool [8D]
Lou V H Photo by John
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Monday, January 29, 2007 4:19 PM
I have purchased several Walthers cars and have not encountered that problem YET. Overall I have been satisfied with them barring the few minor tweaks here and there. It sounds like the electrical contact on the bottom of the car had not been properly installed in the manufacturing process. That contact keeps the truck clearance in check. I tried to push the electrical contact up into the floor of one of my Walthers cars and ran into the same scenario. I want to eliminate the contacts, but figured out I may need a washer or two to maintain the truck clearance.
Smitty
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, January 29, 2007 4:17 PM

Canazar,

Don't be gunshy about the Walthers Budds.  They are very good cars, however, like so many model railroad rolling stock and locomotives there's bound to be an occasional quirk or glitch here and there.  I now have 10 Walthers passenger cars and plan on buying at least 10 more in east coast railroad schemes (SCL, PC, L&N, Southern, Amtrak Phase 1, NYC).

One thing modelers should remember is that when we demand quality and detail from certain items, MAINTENANCE requirements may increase as well.   

 

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Walther's Passenger Car Questions.. I'm Stumped
Posted by canazar on Monday, January 29, 2007 3:30 PM

Well, I decided to pony up some buks and buy a good car.  Instead of the ICH or 'el cheapy passeneger cars out there.  I buy one car, a Santa Fe coach car from the standard  line  (it was 34.95. Has interior and the wireing for lighting) and come to find out that is bad.   The brake piston  (I dont know the proper name for it) rubs BAD on the bottom of the car..  Bad enough it prevented the truck from turning and it caused to pop the truck off the rail.  

Well here is why I love my local store.  I went back and showed them.  They were surprised and there was no question, there was an issue but they were stupmed to know why.   I exchanged it and got a bunch of other stuff instead.

 

So, question..  Anyone else of problems with the Walthers cars?  I admit I am now gunshy about buying them so I am also looking for good quality passenger cars to start collecting.   Any ideas?   

 

Thanks everyone.

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!