jfugate wrote: electrolove wrote:I think I must buy a ME turnout and a bit of ME flextrack and check it out. Do they have a webpage yet?MicroEngineering tends to take the low road when it comes to advertising (they place a few ads per year, sometimes skipping several monthly issues in a row) and they do not seem to be in any hurry to have a web site of their own, so I wouldn't hold my breath.Still, there are places online that carry all their stuff ... here's a link to a good one with pictures.
electrolove wrote:I think I must buy a ME turnout and a bit of ME flextrack and check it out. Do they have a webpage yet?
Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -AnonymousThree may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin "You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry
The mind is like a parachute. It works better when it's open. www.stremy.net
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
jfugate wrote: electrolove wrote:Look at this picture from Railblazers excellent collection: http://www.trainweb.org/railblazer/drgw/drgw14/kobe.htmlAs you can see the ties are not exactly the same length. How common is it to cut the ties at random (on flextrack) when building model railroads? And is it worth the extra work to make the track look realistic? If you have done it, please upload some pictures.Electro:If you use MicroEngineering track, it has the uneven tie positions molded right in the track, so you don't need to do anything. By my way of thinking, ME track is the only way to go -- it has such tiny spikeheads and the naturally uneven ties make it better looking than handlaid once you ballast and weather it.
electrolove wrote:Look at this picture from Railblazers excellent collection: http://www.trainweb.org/railblazer/drgw/drgw14/kobe.htmlAs you can see the ties are not exactly the same length. How common is it to cut the ties at random (on flextrack) when building model railroads? And is it worth the extra work to make the track look realistic? If you have done it, please upload some pictures.
AW NO! Now I gotta go and check every ME tie, square it off and check its position so that it looks like brand new panel track assembled on a jig and dropped into place by a machine in a dead straight line for the appearance that I was planning on!
My first layout when I shifted from HO to N over twenty-five years ago was done in Atlas flex. I have been using Railcraft/Micro Engineering Code 55 flex for most of the last twenty years (I was an apartment dweller for nine of those years and each move required construction of a new layout) and it is still my brand of choice; I have experienced none of the problems associated with ME such as outlined in NS2591's post. Back in the mid-'80s when I decided to shift from Atlas Code 80 to Code 55 I tried my hand at handlaying; after progressing about twenty-five feet I grew weary of the monotony of it all and went to flex; I build my own switches but I understand I have been doing that all wrong and so, on my future layout, I am going to have to take care to build my switches in order to insure frequent derailments.One of the things I like about ME is that it looks like it was installed by railroad workers and not by graphic designers with straight edges - I don't have to examine Micro Engineering track with a microscope to identify the irregular length and offset of the ties. Even at that I do a couple of things to further enhance the prototypical appearance of my track. Randomly I cut lengths of tie material from beneath the rail and install loose (wooden) ties which gives that section different coloration and random tie spacing. I take lengths of 3 foot flex and chop it into smaller lengths and randomly insert it between full length sections - this tends to further break the monotony of the flow of trackwork.My current layout is inoperable and will be demolished and a new one designed and built. One of the things I am going to do on this one is use Micro Engineering Code 40 for sidings, side tracks, and spur/industrial trackage. I have examined Atlas' new line of Code 55 track; it's looks great and it is definitely less expensive but I reckon I'll stick with what has given me trusty service, Micro Engineering flex-trak.
From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet
July,1999, weathering track, George didn't remove ties, but cut random edges off ties to simulate shorter, uneven ties.
Then tells how he paints track for weathered look.
chutton01 wrote:Do you remember if that was the article where he also removed every 3 or so tie (and spread out the rest) to mimic industry spur trackage; in other words, clean mainline trackage would have heavier rail, more ties (closer together, and more orderly placed so less uneven tie ends), and better ballast, while less heavily used branches had less ties, lighter rail, and less evenness and precision in trackwork. All added to prototypical realism...
I don't remember any Sellios articles on laying flex, but one article describing removing a few ties from each stick of flex and spreading the remaining ties out was by Bill Darnaby, November 1997 Model Railroader. It was called "Creating Realistic Track". The techniques work well.
Regards,
Byron
Layout Design GalleryLayout Design Special Interest Group
NS2591 wrote:Joe, I hate to go against what you say, becuase you are 99% of the time right, but the model Railroad club that I'm in used ME track and we're trying to replace it. Yes it looks good, but when the track is layed by someone that is inexperinced and where the climate control isn't very good, it goes bad very fast. The tiny spike heads are what are the problem. if they where just a little bit bigger it would be great track, but they're so little that the track goes out of gauge or the rail breaks off with almost no effort, I was running a train and it went through one of the oldest curves on the layout and the spikes broke and the train derailed. I would never recamend ME track, Atlas may not look the greatest, but it works great!
BXCARMIKE wrote: I think micro- engineering flex has uneven ties molded in. There was an article in either MR or RMC by George Selios, wer he cut random edges of ties to match prototype. Just use sprue cutters and cut one here and there. What's more noticable in the photos are the different colors of the ties.
I think micro- engineering flex has uneven ties molded in. There was an article in either MR or RMC by George Selios, wer he cut random edges of ties to match prototype. Just use sprue cutters and cut one here and there. What's more noticable in the photos are the different colors of the ties.
The extra work is up to you.