cnw400
While you are right on the selective compression, the overall design of the trackwork is just as the prototype had it laid out. Yes the tracks are a little bit shorter but then again the trains being run are just as short.
This idea of running long trains on a small layout and having the engine in one town and the caboose or FRED in 3 or 4 towns away (engine chasing its tail) is not prototypical. If you must run long trains then set the layout design out in the country where you won’t see the 3 town syndrome.
And just for the record I have a fairly large layout. It is in a 25 x 75 basement with a 28 x 15 extension which gives me about 2200 sq ft to work with. I had the room and I knew I would never be happy with a 4 x 8.
So far the mainline is 1000 ft long single track and there is 2800 ft of track (around 42 scale miles) down with over 300 turnouts. The roster has over 800 cars and usually there are 50 engines on the layout at any one time.
I have OPs every other Thursday night and host Mini OPs once or twice a year which is a Saturday afternoon session. In the past I have had OPTUDs (OP Till U Drop) 12 hour sessions and have had as many as 40 operators through the day.
So I guess I am quite serious about the trains thing.
I am modeling the Conrail Lowgrade line from Dubois, PA to Phillipston yard which is right outside of Easy Brady, PA on the old Buffalo to Pittsburgh PRR mainline.
BOB H – Clarion, PA
So you model scale to prototype? 1 mile = about 60 feet HO... that's a mighty big layout?! Or a mighty small bit of prototype?! I don't want to get flamed over this but I don't see how you can " pick a prototype area and the game plan is pretty much set " without some selective compression, unless you have a huge layout. Please enlighten.
Oh well I'm gonna get ripped, regardless...
I will have to agree with CMR (Bob) on this, pick a prototype area and the game plan is pretty much set, otherwise there will always be something new and exciting you see in the real world or on someone elses layout that you 'must' add to yours, the prototype doesnt change too often... however I will say that I will always freelance and replan and rebuild many times to come... i like to think of it as scale evolution.... it happens 87 times faster(for me in HO) than the real world.
Have fun & be safeKarl.
First layout as a so-called adult, 1973. Next one 1975. Next one 1978...1984...1987...2003. Each was better than the last. Each was built on what I'd learned so far, and as I went on I realized that wasn't much! My present layout might last another couple of years, then I'll start another, and this time...
I haven't gotten to the point where I can say "There- that's it"! (and I never will).
All of my restarts (usually from scratch, in terms of benchwork and items attached thereto) have been a result of moves (frequently a result of PCS orders up until 1982) with the exception of the most recent.
When my wife and I moved into our present home, we both said, "Never again!" Our next permanent relocation will be to a National Cemetary.
At that time (3 years ago) I was given title to 1/2 of our 2-car garage, and designed my layout accordingly. It required a lot of compromises to try to cram a ton of interests into a twenty kilogram bag. Construction was well under way when ---
Slightly over two months ago, my wife informed me that she was willing to leave her car out in the sun, so I could have the entire garage for a layout. Since I now have a fifty kilogram bag, I can ease some compromises and add two things I wanted but didn't have room for. Redesign is just about done, and rebuilding is just beginning.
My intention for this to be my last layout does not preclude adding, changing, deleting or modifying part or all of it in the future. It will be finished when my executor reads my will.
Chuck
Caellis, unfortunately I asked the wrong question when I asked about costs and modeling. I trust you read most of the responses and noted that the topic took off in a different direction. I should have deleted the message after the first dozen or so responses.
I did not assert that I exchanged rolling stock or locomotives in the message you referenced. In fact, through the many changes, only the lumber was replaced. And that didn't cost an arm and a leg.
After having spoken to a number of modelers, I learned that they keep the same layout for years, making occasional adjustments and enhancements. My changes were structural --- size became a dominant focus to my family who began taking interest in my rec room and its surroundings. And as I noted above, costs were minimal.
Thanks for reading my messages.
GGB
I'm on my 7th or 8th layout in 20 years.
I've moved 4 times, starting over each time. Of the non-move reconstructions, the first one or two, were because of my improving modeling skills. And the rest, due to my modeling interests changing.
Nick
Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"
CP5415 wrote: I haven't finished my current layout & have already re-worked the track-plan almost 20 times & counting.
I haven't finished my current layout & have already re-worked the track-plan almost 20 times & counting.
And I thought I had reworked mine a lot at four times while under construction.
Soldier,
'Who can continue to pay for this hobby?'
I noticed you are the member that started the 13 page (and counting) thread concerning the cost of model railroading.
Perhaps if you didn't start over so many times it would not be so expensive for you.
Gordon
Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!
K1a - all the way
On my N scale layout if I do scenery and I don't like it 2 weeks later out it comes. I've done this a number of times.
dekruif
Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.
Once again I find myself wanting to restructure my HO layout, practically redoing the entire pike. This makes the third attempt in about five years and many more since I replaced my Lionel for HO -- many decades past. The era my MRR represents the late 1930s into the 1940s.
I don't mean just restructuring portions of a layout: adding, subtracting terrain, or changing an era to be reflected by the layout. I mean starting from scratch.
I began with a layout that was "U" shaped in my rec room. I added a level, but together the layout became overwhelming; it was too much for me. I tore it down and built an oval shaped layout, then a "T, then an "I" and now I'm beginning an "L"-shaped layout
At 75 years old, I suspect this will have to be my last. The old bones in my body need Ben Gay rubbed on them daily and an nap at least twice daily. I'm compelled to be satisfied by the 15' x 12' "L."
I've wondered if there are others like me who seem to have or had a short "enjoyment span" regarding layouts? I realize we all want to enhance our visual presentations and invite challenges, but as often as I have?